Active Users:1182 Time:22/11/2024 11:33:28 PM
Rhetoric is one thing, but I didn't use violent imagery, did I? Joel Send a noteboard - 20/01/2011 01:40:14 AM
Unless of course you are refering the hate filled left wing rhetoric we see everyday

It always come back to "Lalalalala we're never wrong, you're never right, don't confuse me with facts!" A nut shoots a liberal then kills random bystanders including a nine year old child and conservative judge but not only is the shooter COMPLETELY unconnected to the right, he's ACTUALLY a liberal (like his intended target). If dangerous lunatics weren't taking over my country I wouldn't waste my time with this.... :[

I think you're starting to unhinge, and its getting increasingly harder to stay civil in replies. What dangerous lunatics, by name, are taking over this country and what evidence do you cite of this conspiracy? If dangerous lunatics are plotting a coup we need to know... or is this just rhetoric?

It's not a conspiracy, just a critical mass. Perhaps it's going to far to say the dangerous lunatics themselves are taking over, but it seems to me that a growing number of demagogues are perfectly willing to encourage them in the interest of personal power, and consider it small loss if a few traitorous, terrorist, atheist liberal obstacles get killed along the way. As for civility, I understand too well; I used to excel at it, but it's gotten increasingly difficult as everything I espouse out of loyalty to God and country is claimed as proof that I hate both. The people you're defending and their supporters routinely accuse me of treason and godlessness as well as being a friend to terrorists, even if they have to lie to do it; pardon me if my response to that is too forceful. :rolleyes: I think it started somewhere between the time the former Senate Majority Leader convened meetings in megachurches across the nation to launch a simulcast in which he called me and every other liberal "un-Christian" simply for BEING liberals, and the time he called judicial filibusters "unprecedented" despite having engaged in THREE of them.

Just step back and take an honest look at what the demagoguery is breeding. You're no fan of Palin, and I don't think it's just because she's as willing to speak without all the facts as the press was on the day of these shootings: She's a radical egging on other radicals, and that's dangerous whether or not Jared Loughner managed to remain completely oblivious to that for two whole years. Do we really need to wait until someone publicly proclaims himself to have murdered based on what his warped mind understood her to say before we admit that it's far too easy to take her rhetoric, and that of many others, as incitement? Sure, I use strong rhetoric, but I try hard, with what success I'll let others determine, not to dehumanize people or say things that even MIGHT encourage violence against them. Dangerous lunatics are still human beings, and I wish them no ill, nor do I recall ever saying anything to that effect, I just don't want them driving public policy. I don't put them in gunsights or wink at people who question their status as Americans while accusing them of being closet terrorists.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM 1988 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"? - 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM 850 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable. - 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM 1027 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but... - 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM 1072 Views
That's why I said, "popularized". - 16/01/2011 01:46:52 PM 1023 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already - 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM 1365 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread. - 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM 924 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either - 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM 928 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM 956 Views
Re: I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 11:30:38 PM 852 Views
Oh please don't you start to - 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM 808 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before. - 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM 979 Views
it was used here and nobody commented - 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM 867 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here - 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM 919 Views
It's funny you should say that... - 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM 951 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that... - 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM 936 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry. - 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM 960 Views
A rallying cry is hardly illegal - 20/01/2011 05:32:45 PM 1013 Views
I never said it was. - 20/01/2011 06:59:39 PM 1144 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright. - 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM 791 Views
compared to the way similar terms are used? - 19/01/2011 06:58:02 PM 937 Views
I meant I hadn't seen it used in different contexts before. - 19/01/2011 07:35:00 PM 917 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM 1004 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM 1033 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her. - 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM 1171 Views
That means precisely nothing - 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM 870 Views
It means everything. - 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM 1139 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic - 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM 743 Views
There are two points: - 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM 931 Views
Re: It means everything. - 19/01/2011 05:55:02 PM 770 Views
That's simply illogical. - 20/01/2011 01:08:51 AM 1148 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument - 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM 1024 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic - 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM 968 Views
So I am a little confused on something... - 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM 1025 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this - 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM 1161 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly... - 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM 897 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM 908 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM 960 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically. - 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM 796 Views
No, they don't - 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM 982 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one. - 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM 1064 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said - 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM 911 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice) - 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM 948 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity - 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM 997 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice? - 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM 1058 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again* - 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM 883 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it. - 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM 880 Views
There is no point - 21/01/2011 12:22:30 AM 927 Views
If I had no point I wouldn't bother, but fair enough. - 21/01/2011 01:20:32 AM 1176 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book. - 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM 1198 Views
You're awesome at missing points, aren't you? - 16/01/2011 07:26:30 PM 941 Views
where is the accountability for those committing slander? - 17/01/2011 02:52:40 PM 851 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither. - 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM 898 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto - 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM 876 Views
That first line is says it all. - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM 960 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist - 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM 1066 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power". - 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM 949 Views
and that is supposed to mean something? - 20/01/2011 06:06:18 PM 988 Views
YOU are cherry picking. - 20/01/2011 07:50:21 PM 894 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central... - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM 1153 Views
See my reply to Dragonsoul above. - 16/01/2011 07:30:40 PM 1002 Views
Yeah, your first was better - 16/01/2011 09:48:58 PM 815 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed. - 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM 877 Views
Pretty much. - 16/01/2011 11:44:35 PM 960 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM* - 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM 447 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM* - 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM 407 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. - 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM 845 Views
OK Olberman when did I imply otherwise? *NM* - 19/01/2011 02:48:41 PM 458 Views
"Political offices are vandalized on a regular basis". - 20/01/2011 03:16:39 AM 1039 Views
Took you this long, huh? - 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM 797 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy - 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM 812 Views
I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM 788 Views
Re: I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:28:04 PM 931 Views
I always said I'd do that after Bush was re-elected. - 18/01/2011 11:52:45 PM 811 Views
like I said a matter of faith - 17/01/2011 04:27:51 PM 803 Views
I find it interesting... - 17/01/2011 05:31:54 PM 952 Views
I mention her looks solely because... - 20/01/2011 02:30:42 PM 821 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ). - 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM 1007 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity - 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM 812 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs? - 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM 866 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you - 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM 816 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic. - 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM 921 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't - 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM 725 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that. - 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM 819 Views
only in your does the connection exisit - 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM 852 Views
No. - 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM 932 Views
dude wake up - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM 1073 Views
So in your opinion... - 17/01/2011 05:27:58 PM 803 Views
How 'bout simply color coding them? - 18/01/2011 11:21:03 PM 851 Views
Why not just blame Giffords? - 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM 1148 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does. - 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM 967 Views
The left are the ones storing up hate with their pathetic slaner - 18/01/2011 07:53:23 PM 924 Views
At least 95% of the blame is Loughners; he's a nut, but that doesn't exonerate the demagogues. - 18/01/2011 11:24:11 PM 1018 Views
0% belongs to political rhetoric from the right - 19/01/2011 02:47:56 PM 785 Views
Uh huh; it's absurd to mention right wing rhetoric when left wing rhetoric is the OBVIOUS culprit - 19/01/2011 02:59:41 PM 829 Views
No leftist rhetoric? You just called a bunch of people 'dangeorus lunatics' - 19/01/2011 03:37:54 PM 798 Views
Rhetoric is one thing, but I didn't use violent imagery, did I? - 20/01/2011 01:40:14 AM 1122 Views
no but the democratic party used very similar images in the same state - 20/01/2011 06:41:19 PM 855 Views
It's news to me, but I condemn all violent inflammatory imagery and rhetoric. - 20/01/2011 07:13:18 PM 825 Views
it was the national democrats - 20/01/2011 08:32:01 PM 927 Views
The right is not the ones claiming rhetoric is the issue - 19/01/2011 03:58:39 PM 841 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me. - 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM 991 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 19/01/2011 04:51:40 PM 496 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox - 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM 738 Views
You missed the point, obviously. - 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM 847 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO - 19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM 907 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated - 19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM 764 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM* - 19/01/2011 07:04:58 PM 477 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long. - 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM 995 Views
Hey, now. I have to step in. - 20/01/2011 04:44:49 PM 1017 Views
I'm just saying a significant link can be demonstrated. - 20/01/2011 07:07:27 PM 1070 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM 1003 Views

Reply to Message