In this particular case I don't disagree with you.
SilverWarder Send a noteboard - 11/01/2011 09:28:13 PM
I'm just choosing not to 'go there'.
I agree men and women are different and I wish society would stop trying to masquerade that they aren't. It's annoying.
I had a discussion not too long ago about male/female adrenal responses and how that might affect jobs.
The outshoot of it was that, if it should be relevent to a job, measure the appropriate desired adrenal response needed for the job and then test applicants based on that adrenal response.
Some would cry - "That might exclude some people!"
Yes - yes it would. But it would exclude them based on a needed characteristic of the job - not based on their gender.
(Note that Male and Female adrenal responses are DIFFERENT but one is not 'better' then the other - Men have faster adrenal responses - much faster, but women have adrenal responses that are much longer - essentially 'sprinters' vs. 'long distance runners' if you will.)
There are plenty of other differences too - all part of our physiological variances but the key thing to keep in mind is that there are still and always exceptions. While the average man has more upper body strength than the average woman, there are exceptional women who are stronger than average and even above average men (although not exceptional men - the physiology just isn't there for that). Those realities mean that we need to base jobs that require strength as part of it on actual job needs so that if a strong woman applies and makes the grade she has the same chances as a man, is treated the same, paid the same etc.
We also need to watch for people abusing those standards to intentionally exclude people although caution is needed there too. Sometimes the standards need to be exceedingly high for practical purposes. Our local Fire Department has over 400 applicants for every opening - as such the standards they set, both physical and for training/expertise are amazingly high. They exclude almost everyone - of either gender - just to get the applicants down to a manageable number. That's not discrimination - it's setting the standards high to winnow down the applicant pool to only the absolute best. Lives are on the line and the applicant pool is huge. They can fully afford to be picky and should be as otherwise people may die.
In fairness to them all the standards that I've ever heard about do directly apply to the job.
Fairness, ethics and commonsense are all needed. Given our current political environment, there just isn't enough of any of those to go around.
I agree men and women are different and I wish society would stop trying to masquerade that they aren't. It's annoying.
I had a discussion not too long ago about male/female adrenal responses and how that might affect jobs.
The outshoot of it was that, if it should be relevent to a job, measure the appropriate desired adrenal response needed for the job and then test applicants based on that adrenal response.
Some would cry - "That might exclude some people!"
Yes - yes it would. But it would exclude them based on a needed characteristic of the job - not based on their gender.
(Note that Male and Female adrenal responses are DIFFERENT but one is not 'better' then the other - Men have faster adrenal responses - much faster, but women have adrenal responses that are much longer - essentially 'sprinters' vs. 'long distance runners' if you will.)
There are plenty of other differences too - all part of our physiological variances but the key thing to keep in mind is that there are still and always exceptions. While the average man has more upper body strength than the average woman, there are exceptional women who are stronger than average and even above average men (although not exceptional men - the physiology just isn't there for that). Those realities mean that we need to base jobs that require strength as part of it on actual job needs so that if a strong woman applies and makes the grade she has the same chances as a man, is treated the same, paid the same etc.
We also need to watch for people abusing those standards to intentionally exclude people although caution is needed there too. Sometimes the standards need to be exceedingly high for practical purposes. Our local Fire Department has over 400 applicants for every opening - as such the standards they set, both physical and for training/expertise are amazingly high. They exclude almost everyone - of either gender - just to get the applicants down to a manageable number. That's not discrimination - it's setting the standards high to winnow down the applicant pool to only the absolute best. Lives are on the line and the applicant pool is huge. They can fully afford to be picky and should be as otherwise people may die.
In fairness to them all the standards that I've ever heard about do directly apply to the job.
Fairness, ethics and commonsense are all needed. Given our current political environment, there just isn't enough of any of those to go around.
May God stand between you and harm in all the empty places you must walk.
Old Egyptian Blessing
Old Egyptian Blessing
Looks like the feminist movement wasn't as successful as it appears
11/01/2011 06:21:01 PM
- 2093 Views
I think you're extrapolating a bit too much
11/01/2011 06:45:38 PM
- 1170 Views
The aricle does mention that women feel pressured to work when they did not want to
11/01/2011 06:48:47 PM
- 1157 Views
I don't trust the figures.
11/01/2011 06:50:24 PM
- 1184 Views
One assumes the latter, to the extent that "same job with same experience" can be defined. *NM*
12/01/2011 07:10:13 PM
- 602 Views
While I don't 100% agree with the article, some feminists annoy me no end.
11/01/2011 06:47:03 PM
- 1188 Views
My wife told me just this weekend I need to stop pressuring her to have a career
11/01/2011 06:52:11 PM
- 1182 Views
Re: My wife told me just this weekend I need to stop pressuring her to have a career
11/01/2011 09:35:43 PM
- 1158 Views
Re: My wife told me just this weekend I need to stop pressuring her to have a career
12/01/2011 01:36:14 AM
- 1180 Views
It's not just that choice though.
11/01/2011 07:12:48 PM
- 1229 Views
It feels more hypocritical coming from feminists than "traditionalists". *NM*
11/01/2011 07:17:24 PM
- 632 Views
For you maybe.
11/01/2011 07:27:52 PM
- 1168 Views
I agree. I would also like to add, if I may...
12/01/2011 01:27:59 AM
- 1169 Views
all 25 of them?
12/01/2011 05:14:56 AM
- 1112 Views
Pffft, look it up a bit. You might find info on the national propaganda radio (NPR) site.
12/01/2011 12:47:33 PM
- 1141 Views
It's a difficult dynamic even under the best of circumstances, when both partners have chosen it.
12/01/2011 02:25:20 PM
- 1026 Views
I have to admit that this bothers me.
11/01/2011 07:33:09 PM
- 1181 Views
I guess you think the same of me then.
11/01/2011 09:48:31 PM
- 1068 Views
Another one?
12/01/2011 06:01:43 AM
- 1087 Views
Re: Another one?
12/01/2011 12:33:58 PM
- 1128 Views
~never mind~ *NM* *NM*
12/01/2011 04:42:47 PM
- 729 Views
I'm going to answer you anyway.
12/01/2011 04:54:18 PM
- 1189 Views
not to mention
12/01/2011 05:11:42 PM
- 1121 Views
you don't want kids?
12/01/2011 05:46:25 PM
- 1068 Views
bleck
12/01/2011 11:14:25 PM
- 1085 Views
You don't have to be a doctor to contribute to the world
12/01/2011 05:27:26 PM
- 1139 Views
Poor Aeryn
12/01/2011 05:29:47 PM
- 1065 Views
I replied before she edited
12/01/2011 05:41:53 PM
- 1013 Views
The primary issue...
12/01/2011 05:52:42 PM
- 1044 Views
Agreed; ironically, that first line applies to this thread and mine with the parenting article.
13/01/2011 10:00:28 PM
- 1203 Views
It has been a long, long time since I have seen a woman getting looked down on for staying at home.
12/01/2011 01:48:42 AM
- 1014 Views
My commentary on the whys and wherefores of this stuff would be way too politically incorrect
11/01/2011 07:56:24 PM
- 1182 Views
I think all of that makes sense
11/01/2011 08:36:39 PM
- 1113 Views
In this particular case I don't disagree with you.
11/01/2011 09:28:13 PM
- 1028 Views
I'm not sure why either sex should surpass the other in math.
12/01/2011 02:34:09 AM
- 1025 Views
men have more physical strength period
12/01/2011 05:30:14 AM
- 1043 Views
There's a lot more to running (especially marathons) then leg strength.
12/01/2011 05:41:11 AM
- 1022 Views
how much time the experts spend being wrong doesn't make them less wrong
12/01/2011 03:16:10 PM
- 1033 Views
How much more time they've spent studying it before drawing conclusions makes a big difference.
12/01/2011 05:42:26 PM
- 1037 Views
your right it is just a coincidence that their results always matches their politics
12/01/2011 05:56:03 PM
- 1077 Views
There's definitely such a thing as a self fulfilling prophecy.
12/01/2011 07:00:23 PM
- 1048 Views
so you would trust them if they only admitted conseratives?
12/01/2011 09:51:00 PM
- 1070 Views
Admitted? No, but they'll take anyone with the grades.
13/01/2011 09:47:42 PM
- 1053 Views
Every study I have seen shows most schools have few to no non-leberal proffesors
13/01/2011 10:07:08 PM
- 1001 Views
Every study I've ever seen shows that math and science fields have few to no women.
13/01/2011 10:42:46 PM
- 1113 Views
not when we know men are better at math thewpmen are
13/01/2011 11:10:18 PM
- 1140 Views
Sigh... we know no such thing, and even if we did, it would be those biased liberals telling us.
13/01/2011 11:30:33 PM
- 959 Views
When you talk about reasons men "should" be better at math
12/01/2011 03:47:53 PM
- 1081 Views
Both, really; the latter is a consequence of the former.
12/01/2011 05:21:28 PM
- 975 Views
I'm trying to understand your position
12/01/2011 05:28:43 PM
- 1028 Views
Now you've got it.
12/01/2011 06:40:50 PM
- 1135 Views
we know the brain of women works differently then the brains of men
12/01/2011 05:40:15 PM
- 1074 Views
What evidence I'm aware of seems inconclusive.
12/01/2011 06:46:50 PM
- 951 Views
There are theories but of course they are unprovable
12/01/2011 10:50:08 PM
- 1048 Views
That's a logical rationale, and might even be accurate, but in this case I want hard evidence.
13/01/2011 09:03:32 PM
- 962 Views
I think if you look you find you believe all sorts of things that can't be proven
13/01/2011 10:03:54 PM
- 1025 Views
here is some evdience to argue that it is not society but biology
13/01/2011 08:43:43 PM
- 1074 Views
I think you did like I always do and forgot to give us a way to click your link.
13/01/2011 09:56:52 PM
- 1076 Views
oops
13/01/2011 10:07:55 PM
- 1113 Views
Seems like that's an argument for both views, in a way.
13/01/2011 11:14:11 PM
- 985 Views
You can use anything to prove what you want if you are willing to spin it hard enough
14/01/2011 02:57:29 PM
- 1223 Views
I would also like to say this:
11/01/2011 09:33:23 PM
- 1051 Views
Of course
12/01/2011 01:47:14 AM
- 1086 Views
"Night" is also almost invariably feminine, in my experience.
12/01/2011 07:58:12 PM
- 1105 Views
Re: "Night" is also almost invariably feminine, in my experience.
12/01/2011 08:15:59 PM
- 1080 Views
I'm glad YOU think it's fun...
13/01/2011 10:05:07 PM
- 1053 Views
I seem to remember reading about genders in Norwegian once, but I forget now...
13/01/2011 10:11:24 PM
- 1095 Views
Re: I would also like to say this:
12/01/2011 09:15:28 AM
- 1064 Views
Re: I would also like to say this:
12/01/2011 12:27:14 PM
- 1077 Views
No
12/01/2011 12:28:48 PM
- 991 Views
Re: No
12/01/2011 12:35:56 PM
- 960 Views
Re: No
12/01/2011 12:37:33 PM
- 1062 Views
Re: No
12/01/2011 12:43:36 PM
- 1058 Views
Re: No
12/01/2011 12:47:56 PM
- 1091 Views
Since this has become too complicated
12/01/2011 12:54:54 PM
- 1097 Views
The two are used as different psychological concepts.
12/01/2011 02:24:58 PM
- 1046 Views
Have you left a memo at the Feminist Movement's Office?
12/01/2011 12:46:45 AM
- 1090 Views
what the point? Like good liberals they only believe science that agrees with them *NM*
12/01/2011 05:31:09 AM
- 524 Views
Actually, the feminist movement was completely successful.
12/01/2011 01:42:44 AM
- 1104 Views
I was playing a bit but I agree that the feminist in the past accomplished a lot
12/01/2011 05:34:04 AM
- 1106 Views
NOW is just a left-leaning PAC.
12/01/2011 03:16:52 PM
- 1056 Views
I would argue the women's movement and the feminist movement are not the same thing
12/01/2011 03:53:19 PM
- 1016 Views
Mmm. I don't think you understand the feminist movement. You have been reading to many things
12/01/2011 01:56:20 AM
- 1093 Views
I was refering to groups like NOW
12/01/2011 05:40:46 AM
- 1028 Views
Gosh, look what you started.
12/01/2011 03:00:23 PM
- 1078 Views
somebody need to start something it is pretty dead around here *NM*
12/01/2011 03:16:54 PM
- 612 Views
I agree that it would be awesome to hang with my kid every day and not have to work.
12/01/2011 11:33:25 PM
- 1086 Views
that part would be great
12/01/2011 11:40:49 PM
- 1055 Views
I could do it every day.
13/01/2011 12:52:56 AM
- 972 Views
So here's the question. Why don't men have a "choice" to opt-out?
15/01/2011 06:13:28 AM
- 1082 Views
This sounds awful to me.
13/01/2011 04:27:08 AM
- 1063 Views
I should have twigged on to that sooner. I would have if I had read more posts before answering.
13/01/2011 02:50:20 AM
- 1071 Views