Which side is trying to use the tragedy of a mad man with a gun a to demonize the other side?
Both of them are, sadly, but what's more disappointing is that it only seems to bother you when the far left does it.
Why the fascist of course. The Nazis wanted to take over the world the communist wanted tot take over the world. Sorry don't see opposite ends of a political spectrum there.
That's because you're choosing to narrowly focus on a single aspect of what were far more complex ideologies.
I am more than willing to admit that both sides use harsh rhetoric so lets stop all the whining and claims that it is the right who is causing the problem and lets stop trying to exploit a tragedy to silence the opposition. Which is what they are doing of course. Constant attacks accusing the right of inciting violence and then when something like this happens us e the passion and panic created to put pressure on the right to tone it down while they (who are of course innocent) continue the attacks. They are not even letting the fact that this incident has nothing to do with political rhetoric stop them from using it to "prove" the right is crazy and dangerous.
Extremists and opportunists on BOTH sides are guilty of that, and I'd like nothing better than to move past that, but dismissing one extremes exploitation and embracing the others won't achieve that goal. That's still just giving political opponents all the blame, for the exploitation itself now instead of the violence. They're BOTH wrong and should both be repudiated.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
The Arizona Tragedy and the Politics of Blood Libel
10/01/2011 04:02:29 AM
- 1584 Views
The NYT and liberal media have created a climate of stupidity
10/01/2011 05:47:29 PM
- 866 Views
Pot, Kettle. I think you two should discuss your color.
10/01/2011 09:26:05 PM
- 889 Views
nice try but no
10/01/2011 09:52:01 PM
- 805 Views
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means...."
10/01/2011 11:53:10 PM
- 1049 Views
no you are just wearing Danny's blinders
11/01/2011 02:15:46 PM
- 903 Views
I try to steer clear of personal attacks.
11/01/2011 04:00:35 PM
- 809 Views
I try to make my point clear and I can't help if you skip them
11/01/2011 05:02:41 PM
- 806 Views
I didn't skip your points, I disputed them.
11/01/2011 05:51:10 PM
- 779 Views
you keep claiming both sides but you fail to offer any support
11/01/2011 06:00:41 PM
- 822 Views
Those who have accused specific people or groups will most likely have to backtrack and apologize.
10/01/2011 06:48:33 PM
- 959 Views
they will neither back track or apologize
10/01/2011 07:54:54 PM
- 813 Views
I don't really think the NYT has crossed that line I was talking about.
10/01/2011 09:54:36 PM
- 831 Views
not sure where you draw your line but this crosses mine
10/01/2011 10:11:04 PM
- 928 Views
Yes, well, Krugman is Krugman.
10/01/2011 10:25:31 PM
- 762 Views

You see to be arguing we should assume his political views were created by the politcal climate
11/01/2011 03:03:15 PM
- 1001 Views
Indeed I am.
11/01/2011 06:18:56 PM
- 820 Views
it is not a wake up call to anything but left wing hestrics if their is no connection
11/01/2011 06:29:47 PM
- 983 Views
wasn't pim fortuyn a right winger though?
11/01/2011 04:33:26 PM
- 730 Views
Um, yes, that was pretty much the point I was making.
11/01/2011 06:22:06 PM
- 819 Views
Was there anyhting besides his stance on immigration to support the argument he was far right?
11/01/2011 06:31:05 PM
- 963 Views
Yes, though it's true that is the key part.
11/01/2011 07:11:13 PM
- 927 Views
can one posistion define you as being far right or far left?
11/01/2011 08:23:18 PM
- 847 Views
One single position? I wouldn't know, I can't think of any examples.
11/01/2011 08:41:58 PM
- 916 Views
... cut both ways because soulless opportunism knows no creed:
10/01/2011 09:46:31 PM
- 865 Views
They probably wouldn't say much because it really doesn't show much
10/01/2011 09:58:46 PM
- 742 Views
It really doesn't show that he has "left leanings".
10/01/2011 10:07:48 PM
- 852 Views
Well they call him a liberal and like it or not the Nazi movement was an extreme form of socialism
10/01/2011 10:22:04 PM
- 966 Views
Deep sigh.
10/01/2011 10:34:33 PM
- 892 Views
well we are talking about the US right and left not the European one
11/01/2011 01:11:30 PM
- 820 Views
Actually, I believe we were talking about the Nazi right or left.
11/01/2011 07:04:56 PM
- 903 Views

wow I really need to stop posting from my i-phone an you deserve a cookie for being able to follow
11/01/2011 07:48:35 PM
- 1014 Views
A thousand times no.
11/01/2011 10:38:19 PM
- 1023 Views
Bucnd and the Nazi part are and never were associtaed with what we consider American right politics
11/01/2011 11:34:46 PM
- 850 Views
What you do/n't "consider" part of the left/right is precisely the problem here.
12/01/2011 01:06:56 AM
- 986 Views
Liberal college professors didn't call the nazis far right, people who lived under Nazis did.
10/01/2011 10:56:33 PM
- 1114 Views
If demoniizing your opponet makes your a fscist then you have made my argument for me
11/01/2011 01:25:51 PM
- 943 Views
In a word, no.
11/01/2011 04:29:36 PM
- 780 Views
really would you like to point to the right trying to use this to demonize the left?
11/01/2011 05:59:49 PM
- 798 Views
I already have, irrespective of your inability and/or refusal to see it.
11/01/2011 09:53:38 PM
- 853 Views
I don't know enough about the story to say much save that partisan finger pointing is wrong.
10/01/2011 10:30:51 PM
- 931 Views
First I don't even know who WorldNet is so I see no reasont o defend them
11/01/2011 01:36:44 PM
- 810 Views
For someone who doens't know who WND is you sure circled the wagons around them fast.
11/01/2011 04:21:40 PM
- 1010 Views

No they are in no way the same
11/01/2011 05:06:43 PM
- 781 Views
They're precisely the same in tone.
11/01/2011 06:04:42 PM
- 890 Views
the only thing you have proven is that you have zero support for your argument
11/01/2011 06:36:14 PM
- 821 Views
Enough.
11/01/2011 10:18:59 PM
- 791 Views
your evidience is dribble and if that is the best you can I am sorry
11/01/2011 11:39:05 PM
- 782 Views
Liberals and Conservatives have rushed to frame Jared Lee Loughner’s motives...
10/01/2011 10:34:09 PM
- 971 Views
Which conseratives rushed to frame this for poltical gain?
11/01/2011 02:19:55 PM
- 780 Views
But that's how it always goes:"The animal is so treacherous; when it is attacked, it defends itself"
18/01/2011 03:15:35 PM
- 821 Views