I disagree; even to the extent that's the real problem it's still down to indulgent parents.
Joel Send a noteboard - 07/01/2011 04:52:26 PM
His arguments don't real support his conclusion they are just easy for a lot of people to agree and they seem some what related so they sound good. It isn't helicopter parents and hand sanitizer that are the problem (I am sure people laughed at all those parents making their kids brush their as well). Kids today are soft because they spend all their time sitting on the ass being entertained.
One of the things that toughens kids up is having to fight. Who is in favor of more violence and bullying at school?
As for the rising level of anxiety at our college system I would think the fact that some many more students go is part of the problem. A lot of the kids in our university system really shouldn't be there.
One of the things that toughens kids up is having to fight. Who is in favor of more violence and bullying at school?
As for the rising level of anxiety at our college system I would think the fact that some many more students go is part of the problem. A lot of the kids in our university system really shouldn't be there.
A lot of is down to stunted social development due to the extremes to which parental involvement have gone: Most aspects of the formal social environment are heavily regimented by parents, while children are allowed to much latitude in the informal one. So parents tell kids it's "wrong" to want their youth soccer team to win, but don't want to "interfere" when they discover the kids are sneaking out to get high, steal cars and conceive more children in the back seats of them. I still think it comes down to misplaced and even warped parental priorities; if parents didn't force schools to admit them all there wouldn't be a surplus of college students.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Child Psychology: Are Todays Parents Mental?
- 06/01/2011 11:21:53 PM
1128 Views
Very interesting article, thanks for posting.
- 07/01/2011 01:36:51 AM
722 Views
Welcome, and I'll pass that along to the person through whom I learned of it. 
- 07/01/2011 02:19:07 AM
496 Views
- 07/01/2011 02:19:07 AM
496 Views
I just began thinking about how my parents raised me as I was reading this.
- 07/01/2011 02:24:33 AM
625 Views
The middle way seems best; 'grats to you and your folks.
- 07/01/2011 06:35:50 PM
491 Views
Thanks Joel. And I agree with you that most of the time, the middle way is best.
- 07/01/2011 06:52:10 PM
432 Views
meh
- 07/01/2011 02:34:47 PM
636 Views
I disagree; even to the extent that's the real problem it's still down to indulgent parents.
- 07/01/2011 04:52:26 PM
695 Views
exterem paretnal involment is being overstated
- 08/01/2011 03:10:09 AM
631 Views
It's extreme indulgence, not involvement.
- 08/01/2011 03:44:43 AM
653 Views
extreme indulgence is a problem but with one exception those were not good examples
- 08/01/2011 04:47:05 PM
660 Views
"Kids need to feel badly sometimes"? What should we do? Dip their fingers in acid?
- 07/01/2011 03:00:17 PM
561 Views
It would work, and definitely put an end to all this touchy-feeliness.
- 07/01/2011 04:47:16 PM
508 Views
- 07/01/2011 04:47:16 PM
508 Views
I would classify editing the N-word out of Huckleberry Finn to apply to this issue...
- 07/01/2011 11:26:05 PM
596 Views
"Undiplomatic" is one thing, "inflammatory" quite another.
- 07/01/2011 11:51:03 PM
523 Views
Re: "Undiplomatic" is one thing, "inflammatory" quite another.
- 09/01/2011 12:20:47 AM
624 Views
If the stakes are small or there's no alternative I don't mind going with your gut.
- 09/01/2011 01:20:42 AM
595 Views
Re: If the stakes are small or there's no alternative I don't mind going with your gut.
- 09/01/2011 01:28:28 AM
532 Views
Sadly so.
- 09/01/2011 01:32:23 AM
534 Views
Re: Sadly so.
- 09/01/2011 01:41:39 AM
478 Views
Hadn't seen that, no.
- 09/01/2011 11:21:20 PM
629 Views
Re: Hadn't seen that, no.
- 10/01/2011 04:59:53 PM
660 Views
Does M$ have U2 and Steves permission to use their names in that patent application? 
- 10/01/2011 07:46:54 PM
610 Views
- 10/01/2011 07:46:54 PM
610 Views
Re: Does M$ have U2 and Steves permission to use their names in that patent application?
- 10/01/2011 09:54:50 PM
613 Views
- 10/01/2011 09:54:50 PM
613 Views
. *NM*
well your reply shows us what we end up with if we have over indulgent parnets
- 10/01/2011 04:08:38 PM
580 Views
It's a good article, but contains a bit of oversimplification.
- 11/01/2011 09:36:35 PM
572 Views
Actually, I tend to agree, 'cos I somewhat agree with rt it diagnoses symptoms better than problems
- 11/01/2011 11:53:48 PM
767 Views