The NFC West is absolutely horrid. No team at or above .500
I think being confined in that division with San Francisco gave them all football AIDS. Under the old alignment, IIRC, teams played different schedules and there was more flexibility. Now two teams in the same division play exactly the same teams for 12 games, with two more games against each other. Their schedules vary by only two games. Plus the West used to consist of SF, LA/StL, NO, Atl & then Carolina. They had teams from coast to coast and were less confined. All jammed up together on the West Coast and Mississippi, they end up sharing needles and condoms more, and catch each others' suck.
And please don't join the chorus of whiners demanding a revamping of the playoff format to exclude the Western division champion or else realigning the conference. Two years ago this division produced the NFC champion. There is no guarantee that they will all suck next year. That is a superior kind of parity - not every team in the league finishing between 7-9 and 9-7, but that one year a team can go from 4-12 to 11-5 and go to a Super Bowl. Sometimes, however, you'll end up with some statistical clustering.
Also, there are other factors in a division's apparent weakness. For instance, they play against the NFC South this year, which is apparently one of the stronger divisions in the NFC. Are their records so bad because they have to play three games against teams still in the playoff hunt? Or are the records of the NFC South inflated by getting four games against the West? Given that both of Carolina's wins came against the West, I would probably pick the latter, but you never can tell. For the record, the score in that match-up is 3 wins for the West, against 12 for the South, with one remaining game. By contrast, the North vs East match-up is tied at 7 wins apiece, the AFC South V West match-up is 6-7 South, and the AFC East v North contest is 9-7. No other match-up of divisions is so one-sided. Their records against the NFC North & East & AFC are fairly similar, so the disparity in records of the two divisions almost certainly comes from playing one another. So before people start whining that St. Louis or Seattle is going to the playoffs at 7-9 or 8-8, while Tampa Bay will need some help to make the playoffs with a 10-6 record because the former is in a weak division and the latter in a strong, remember that Tampa Bay gets four games against those pansy Western teams, and St. Louis and Seattle had to play defending Super Bowl champion New Orleans, and current top-ranked Atlanta, and Seattle had to face New York and Chicago as well, while Tampa Bay is enjoying the fruits of a last-place finish last year, and getting to play Washington & Detroit for their only games against the East & North. You can't iron out all the random flukes that screw up a schedule.
The NFC West is consistently bad. I just went and checked and 2005 to today, the NFC West is far and away the worst division. In that time, they have won 150 games. The next worse division in that span, the AFC West, has managed to win 176 games. Further, they are the only team in that span to not break .500 as a division even once, while every other division has done it at least twice, except the NFC North.
2005-Week 15 2010
1. AFC South 211-165 .561
2. NFC East 209-166 .557
3. AFC East 194-182 .516
3. NFC South 194-182 .516
5. AFC North 191-184 .509
6. NFC North 178-198 .473
7. AFC West 176-200 .468
8. NFC West 150-226 .399
Now this obviously isn't perfect, but the NFC West looks to be undisputed as the worst division in the NFL. Looking at things division by division year by year shows some interesting patterns in the NFL.
Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.
My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
Worst division in the history of the NFL?
22/12/2010 04:08:33 AM
- 489 Views
Re: Worst division in the history of the NFL?
22/12/2010 04:35:01 AM
- 440 Views
I don't think anyone's complaining about a January game in St. Louis instead of Green Bay or NJ
22/12/2010 05:15:15 AM
- 467 Views
Realignment was poorly executed, but the NFC West at least makes some sense.
22/12/2010 06:34:10 AM
- 470 Views
Normaly I'd agree, but those teams are so bad whomever plays them has a first week Bye.
22/12/2010 07:06:03 AM
- 455 Views
They're all at least two games below .500 which means it took you more than a week to notice this.
22/12/2010 05:14:15 AM
- 600 Views
Yeah, My bad.
22/12/2010 06:56:35 AM
- 505 Views