I think they are on slippery slope but a fairly firm part up near the top
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 21/12/2010 03:46:58 PM
Books that argue about the what the law should be are protected. Books that tell how to violate the law are less protected. Does free speech really require that any 14 year-old who wants to can find detialed instructions on how to make bombs or make mustard gas out of house hold cleaning supplies? Sometimes public saftey has to be considered as well.
If you right a book arguing that it is OK to rape children I will think you are disgusting bastard but that you shouldn't be arrested. A guide on how to do it is another story.
If you right a book arguing that it is OK to rape children I will think you are disgusting bastard but that you shouldn't be arrested. A guide on how to do it is another story.
This should make for an interesting debate
21/12/2010 02:19:39 PM
- 794 Views
Free speech. An easy way for me to tell is replace the topic with the word "murder"
21/12/2010 02:33:17 PM
- 426 Views
I don't know. Isn't it illegal to write a how to for making a bomb?
21/12/2010 02:51:34 PM
- 453 Views
Incitement to racial hatred isn't illegal in the US, I believe...
21/12/2010 04:02:58 PM
- 424 Views
I think they are on slippery slope but a fairly firm part up near the top
21/12/2010 03:46:58 PM
- 464 Views
What about a textbook, detailing how to make explosives?
21/12/2010 04:13:02 PM
- 514 Views
do you want him to be able to pick up a book givining him detailed instructions on how to kill you
21/12/2010 05:31:09 PM
- 431 Views
First Amendment free speech protections were written to provide just that.
22/12/2010 06:56:28 AM
- 407 Views
As is the case so often of late, impossible to tell as there isn't enough information.
21/12/2010 06:33:29 PM
- 432 Views
The guy is gross and disgusting of course, but what is in the book?
22/12/2010 01:21:13 AM
- 442 Views