it isn't a very good summary if it changes the questions ask
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 21/12/2010 01:54:46 PM
I should have said the summary of the study's findings.
Heh.
The original study was biased and the article covering is inaccurate. They didn't get the questions right and they left out how small the margin was on many of the questions or question that Fox viewers answered corrrectly more often then some others. If the questions had not been hand pick to show thing republican are more likely to get wrong the results might be different.
You should change the heaqd line to "Liberals prove to themsleves how smart they really are"
Heh.
Extended exposure to Fox News makes voters stupid, university study finds
- 16/12/2010 11:02:18 PM
847 Views
Seems like one of those chicken/egg scenarios, as alluded to by Macharius.
- 17/12/2010 01:09:15 AM
418 Views
Normally yes, in this case the author's just an incompetent idiot
- 17/12/2010 02:28:50 AM
501 Views
what are the affects of being exposed to inaccurate articels about biased surveys?
- 20/12/2010 11:30:35 PM
377 Views
My brain is broken.
- 20/12/2010 11:44:14 PM
389 Views
it isn't a very good summary if it changes the questions ask
- 21/12/2010 01:54:46 PM
458 Views
Whereas people who watch CNN & MSNBC were that way to begin with...
- 21/12/2010 11:30:00 PM
375 Views