Sorry, I don't want to dismiss that entire article by criticizing one point, but that did seem particularly ludicrous to me.
Other than that, I'm still not sure I agree with his point. Obviously Congress had to do something, but so much more than for victims of less spectacular events - when we all know that the private charity is going to be so much less for less spectacular events, too? Dubious.
Let's be serious, it was a retarded pledge to begin with. Reid is naive if he thinks he can call their bluff this way, agreed, but he really shouldn't have to, either.
Other than that, I'm still not sure I agree with his point. Obviously Congress had to do something, but so much more than for victims of less spectacular events - when we all know that the private charity is going to be so much less for less spectacular events, too? Dubious.
One should also remember that after repeated delays to avoid passing taxes or budget before the election, when Reid began putting other things on the agenda ahead of tax/budget the GOP pledged to filibuster everything till that was done, Reid should never have tried for all these delays, and certainly shouldn't cry at the GOP response or try to call their bluff this way.
Let's be serious, it was a retarded pledge to begin with. Reid is naive if he thinks he can call their bluff this way, agreed, but he really shouldn't have to, either.
GOP rejects health care costs for 9/11 rescue workers
- 13/12/2010 03:44:38 AM
833 Views
Probably it didn't make the news because it's not so much "news" as "repeat occurrence".
- 13/12/2010 03:59:42 AM
461 Views
It's not particularly open and shut
- 13/12/2010 07:26:39 AM
558 Views
The assassination of JFK? Seriously?
- 13/12/2010 09:00:45 PM
575 Views
I have no problem with this vote - nothing comes to the floor until.....
- 13/12/2010 05:15:59 PM
476 Views
Why would such a thing be a federal issue? Why is the whole country paying for a very local issue?
- 15/12/2010 11:15:58 AM
518 Views