Active Users:1132 Time:22/11/2024 04:00:34 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
this doesn't quite sound like a "flub" LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 09/12/2010 04:41:27 PM
At least, no more a flub than many other inconsistencies between scientific papers. *yawn* Maybe they didn't wash it because they knew it would break down and wanted to preserve it? Why didn't they wash it? I doubt they just "Forgot".

The only reason it "matters" so much is because it was so publicized. Which is probably the real problem here anyways. Media whoring.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 09/12/2010 at 04:42:20 PM
Reply to message
NASA flubbed up! Fox and Ravens - 09/12/2010 05:52:24 AM 890 Views
Yeah, I don't really understand BlackAdder - 09/12/2010 07:16:01 AM 579 Views
That's their natural environment, yeah; too bad NASAs weren't grown there. Joel - 10/12/2010 05:42:59 PM 539 Views
There's no "simply" about DNA made with arsenic instead of phosphorous. *NM* Ghavrel - 10/12/2010 11:49:16 PM 197 Views
When the lead in heavily implies an ET, yes, there is. Joel - 11/12/2010 12:00:08 AM 362 Views
Arsenic is an element. It can't break down in water. Tim - 09/12/2010 09:22:22 AM 480 Views
Yeah....it washes off Fox and Ravens - 09/12/2010 04:03:40 PM 476 Views
this doesn't quite sound like a "flub" LadyLorraine - 09/12/2010 04:41:27 PM 447 Views
I hope the original study proves correct. Darth_Katie - 10/12/2010 10:36:43 PM 456 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes