I am not a religious person although I am spiritual. I have no problem with science and evolution makes sense to me. It is the attitude of some scientists that bothers me. The attitude of some religious people bothers me too. In both groups it is the ones that don't just think that they re right and that everyone else is wrong but but also feel the need to be vocal about their lack of respect for the view points of others.
Respecting someone's right to hold a view, and respecting the view itself are two different things. Views are worthy or unworthy of respect based on their merit, not just their existence.
You spoke of believing in things because of evidence. I have mounds of personal evidence that God exists. On the other hand I have to take other people's word for it that men walked on the moon. The two are not mutually exclusive. I am just pointing out that much of what we are told by science are things that the vast majority of us have to take on faith as we don't have the time or means to prove it ourselves. It isn't so different from people believing in various religious concepts. Just something to think about before you bash the other side. I don't even see where there has to be two sides. It isn't hard to embrace both.
The difference between the two types of evidence is falsifiability. You could, in theory, check if men walked on the moon. No one can can check your personal evidence for God's existence. (I discuss this in reply to Nate's post above.) It isn't hard to embrace both sides because humans can live with a certain amount of cognitive dissonance, but that doesn't make it a good thing.
This is far from what I was originally saying that I didn't think it was such a stretch that their may be other manifestations of life out there besides the ones we are familiar with.
I agree that it's not a stretch. We can't possibly imagine all the forms life could take. That's not really why this discovery is noteworthy; it's because now we have proof of a new (or at least altered) form.
More Important Than Soccer: Completely new type of DNA discovered
02/12/2010 04:48:51 PM
- 1471 Views
that is TOTALLY inappropriate
02/12/2010 04:58:47 PM
- 684 Views
Crazy awesome.
02/12/2010 05:07:49 PM
- 769 Views
So the movie Evolution was real!
02/12/2010 05:24:16 PM
- 675 Views
Wow. *NM*
02/12/2010 05:32:08 PM
- 414 Views
Dang. I thought it was naturally occurring. Missed the part where it was grown in a lab.
03/12/2010 02:16:16 AM
- 732 Views
I won't pretend I know enough about biology to understand the impact of this
02/12/2010 06:26:24 PM
- 752 Views
It's like finding a type of rock that eats laughter
02/12/2010 06:51:15 PM
- 601 Views
... without coming down and dealing with the nasty stomach cramps.
02/12/2010 09:49:06 PM
- 811 Views
I think I had an ex once that was made of arsenic. *NM*
02/12/2010 07:10:57 PM
- 371 Views
So, is it an alien?
02/12/2010 07:19:49 PM
- 740 Views
They haven't mentioned anything saying it's not from Earth, I think
02/12/2010 08:03:44 PM
- 747 Views
The bacteria in question is part of a known lineage
02/12/2010 08:07:34 PM
- 959 Views
see my note below
02/12/2010 08:13:35 PM
- 752 Views
Maybe
02/12/2010 08:23:16 PM
- 677 Views
So, apparently, this bacteria doesn't use arsneic for its DNA in its natural state?
02/12/2010 08:06:02 PM
- 632 Views
While awesome, it's a bit of a problem.
02/12/2010 09:04:22 PM
- 650 Views
True, but I'm not "looking for" anything in particular, so I just like it *NM*
02/12/2010 11:09:21 PM
- 405 Views
Less cool a revelation than I was hoping, but certainly not a complete disappointment. *NM*
02/12/2010 10:35:33 PM
- 361 Views
I don't understand why this is such a big deal. It always seemed common sense to me that there are
02/12/2010 10:40:22 PM
- 785 Views
I think it just makes them happy that they can widen the parameters for life-sustaining planets. *NM*
02/12/2010 11:00:31 PM
- 346 Views
yah. it's one thing to theorize, another thing to find something to hold true.
02/12/2010 11:10:23 PM
- 665 Views
It's much more than an educated guess.
02/12/2010 11:59:18 PM
- 820 Views
You can't "know" from this distance.
03/12/2010 03:13:05 AM
- 617 Views
Why not?
03/12/2010 04:42:15 AM
- 809 Views
obviously you have not learned to look at the back label on the car *NM*
04/12/2010 07:04:42 PM
- 354 Views
Yes, we can.
04/12/2010 06:04:48 PM
- 980 Views
The problem probably is with me.
04/12/2010 08:00:56 PM
- 640 Views
No, they aren't.
04/12/2010 10:01:25 PM
- 659 Views
Are you baiting me to bait you?
05/12/2010 06:41:49 AM
- 812 Views
I'm just carrying on a conversation.
05/12/2010 07:26:39 AM
- 814 Views
Re: I'm just carrying on a conversation.
05/12/2010 07:08:04 PM
- 597 Views
Re: I'm just carrying on a conversation.
05/12/2010 07:56:43 PM
- 804 Views
Re: I'm just carrying on a conversation.
06/12/2010 03:15:37 AM
- 742 Views
I made my students watch the NASA channel for over two hours today
02/12/2010 11:11:40 PM
- 545 Views