Active Users:832 Time:24/11/2024 10:39:50 PM
That ain't not a lot simpler Isaac Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM
It's pretty messed up when one of the resident physicists can't follow the conversation when the matter at hand appears to be cosmic principles :P


That anthropomorphizing the universe does not represent an irrational cognitive error if you are assuming from the start that there is a Creator of some sort that is relatable on human terms, as you might assume from a religious viewpoint. So you're not misattributing human characteristics because they really do exist - given the assumptions of a particular metaphysical framework (i.e. religious beliefs).

Is that right? I think that's right.


So, if there's a God, who is kind of like people, other things might be too? Yes?
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1002 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 474 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 621 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 262 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 219 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 532 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 592 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 580 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 571 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 478 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 617 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 265 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 202 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 489 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 521 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 462 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 662 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 576 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 524 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 619 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 234 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 209 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 546 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 588 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 541 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 752 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 525 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 823 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 487 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 734 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 470 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 645 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 540 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 498 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 454 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 463 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 602 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 561 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 214 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 536 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 470 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 222 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 518 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 457 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 498 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 181 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 185 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 181 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 467 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 551 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 203 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 210 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 579 Views

Reply to Message