You mean the Denver teams that are famous for illegal cut blocks?
We didn't deliberately chop block (it's easy to do accidently if one blocker falls into the legs of a defender engaged on another blocker).
Everything I've seen so far says that cut blocks are illegal AWAY from the LoS, and even that's only been true since '05. Wikipedia says this:
"The linemen of some teams that use zone blocking schemes have been criticized for their penchant for cut blocking the knees of defenders, sometimes away from the play. Cut blocks are illegal in the open field and when a defensive player is engaged by another offensive player. Legal cut blocks should be aimed at the opposing player's waist or hip. Although some consider the technique unsportsmanlike because of the risk of serious injury, when taught and applied correctly it is a very effective tactic. In fact, some defensive players employ the technique to eliminate blockers so other defenders can make the tackle".
The other links I found were mostly newspaper articles discussing plans to change the rules (as has since been done) so that cut blocks AWAY from the play were illegal, in large part prompted by a cut block by Broncos RT George Foster (a lump and a bust) on Chargers DE Igor Olshansky. I'm not sure how anyone could say blocking in the pocket or at the point of a runners attack is "away from the play" and one of the articles discussing the impending change even cites the Falcons GM saying injuries from cut blocks between the tackles haven't been a big problem.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A43421-2005Mar17.html
I guess I can't blame people being confused though; I DID find a month old article from your own L.A. Times whose author argues that instead of worrying about helmet to helmet the League needs to get rid of "chop blocks", which he proceeds to use interchangeably with "cut block" througout the article, though all player and coach quotes reference "cut blocks". He even defines them the same at one point, and states that chop blocks are legal at the point of attack on runs, just not passes. With people peddling that kind of misinformation, and the rules on cut blocks restricted just a few years ago, it's no wonder a lot of fans are misinformed on the matter. I pretty much know what Southern Californian sportswriters have to say about cut blocking, since those teams are 25% of Denvers schedule, but it would be nice if he could be more factually accurate than this:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/oct/21/sports/la-sp-nfl-farmer-20101022
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Hopefully this will finally get McDaniels fired from the Broncos
27/11/2010 06:45:12 PM
- 787 Views
I think the evidence should be thrown out based on their sucking in that game. *NM*
27/11/2010 07:27:28 PM
- 173 Views
Was the session closed?
27/11/2010 08:06:28 PM
- 501 Views
The LEAGUE said no one could tape it, and virtually shouted it at the Cheatriots after Spygate.
28/11/2010 12:05:00 AM
- 447 Views
So they were allowed to watch but not tape?
28/11/2010 12:37:59 AM
- 443 Views
Well, I suppose they could spend all their time watching the '9ers practice if the skipped their own
28/11/2010 01:00:38 AM
- 436 Views
Or just send an extra guy there
28/11/2010 01:07:02 AM
- 439 Views
Probably would still be illegal, but I'm not sure it could be done so easily.
28/11/2010 02:22:52 AM
- 588 Views
Then why not practice behind closed doors?
28/11/2010 07:56:36 AM
- 495 Views
Normally they do, at least part of the time, but there were extenuating circumstances.
28/11/2010 12:13:23 PM
- 428 Views
My point is that all they'd have to do is tell the people running Wembley
29/11/2010 11:18:06 AM
- 410 Views
Closed practices are fairly common, but I'm not sure how it works when BOTH teams are "visitors".
29/11/2010 12:51:33 PM
- 425 Views
I presume they staggered the practices
29/11/2010 03:29:29 PM
- 402 Views
Logical, but there was a definite time crunch, which affected both teams.
29/11/2010 03:33:52 PM
- 480 Views
OMFG, someone must've dropped the boy genius on his head a few (dozen) times as a child.
28/11/2010 12:20:03 AM
- 463 Views
Well, John, here's hoping he doesn't get fired.
28/11/2010 05:13:06 PM
- 470 Views
Thanks for the invite
28/11/2010 07:19:08 PM
- 463 Views
Pretty sad when the Faders can tut tut Denver for poor sportsmanship though.
29/11/2010 01:01:08 PM
- 501 Views
Really?
29/11/2010 02:37:39 PM
- 493 Views
Cut blocks are legal, chop blocks aren't.
29/11/2010 03:29:33 PM
- 434 Views
cut blocks are illegal at the LOS and also sometimes in the open field depending on the play
30/11/2010 01:33:09 AM
- 458 Views
Have a source for that? 'Cos I can't find one.
30/11/2010 03:56:26 AM
- 520 Views
my mistake. cut blocking is only illegal if done below the knees
30/11/2010 05:09:11 AM
- 495 Views
No biggy; I only know 'cos Denver fans have to deal with these accusations a dozen times a year
30/11/2010 05:01:49 PM
- 551 Views