what I think has been lost in the debate is it looks like it will be a good movie
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 15/09/2009 08:14:04 PM
It was an f*ing filme review and the first post claimed it was an article supporting creationism. Instead of calling that idea silly we got a bunch of people apearing to agre. From what I can see the majority of those people know very little about the creationist thinking or the debate between creation an evolution. I find all of that highly ironic.
See, there's the problem. It wasn't a film review - it's an article about an upcoming movie, and the debate it has sparked. In fact, the title of the article is "Creation film sparks evolution arguments." And the author decides to take it upon his/herself to finish up with a terrible list of the "top 5 arguments for each side."
Maybe it's just me (though judging from this thread, I doubt it), but it also looked like the author spend a modicum more time on the "arguments for creation" column, which led me to believe that was his/her personal stance. Regardless, the general shoddiness of the article stands, no matter the author's personal feelings on the matter.
I can't even believe this.
13/09/2009 07:40:02 PM
- 1042 Views
Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
13/09/2009 07:43:15 PM
- 574 Views
Re: Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
13/09/2009 10:28:42 PM
- 671 Views
That is one amazingly stupid article...
13/09/2009 08:04:47 PM
- 614 Views
The author used the phrase "proven theories." Ergo, their argument is invalid. *NM*
14/09/2009 01:11:51 AM
- 316 Views
seriously. there's no such thing as a truly proven theory
14/09/2009 01:52:30 AM
- 583 Views
Re: definition of "theory"
14/09/2009 04:49:13 AM
- 639 Views
I can't really tell
14/09/2009 08:14:14 PM
- 621 Views
I think you are getting workedup over nothing
14/09/2009 09:57:22 PM
- 773 Views
That's... not exactly it.
14/09/2009 10:33:02 PM
- 534 Views
not that is exactly it
14/09/2009 11:10:52 PM
- 781 Views
No, Craig is quite right.
14/09/2009 11:21:11 PM
- 585 Views
No you just happen to wrong with him
15/09/2009 01:14:16 AM
- 574 Views
Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM
- 779 Views
Re: Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM
- 728 Views
'Fraid not.
14/09/2009 11:24:00 PM
- 586 Views
It's not, it's supposed to be relatively decent - mainstream conservative newspaper. *NM*
14/09/2009 11:28:44 PM
- 276 Views
Re: 'Fraid not.
15/09/2009 01:21:14 AM
- 580 Views
15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM
- 674 Views
completely aside from this argument you guys have here...
15/09/2009 05:02:21 AM
- 619 Views
Interrupter!
15/09/2009 06:11:40 AM
- 561 Views
Re: Interrupter!
15/09/2009 06:54:56 AM
- 667 Views
One brain C4, coming up...
15/09/2009 12:00:26 PM
- 614 Views
The age of the universe is an important point in the creationist argument
15/09/2009 05:53:41 PM
- 650 Views
Exactly. So it was in the wrong column.
15/09/2009 07:58:15 PM
- 599 Views
what I think has been lost in the debate is it looks like it will be a good movie
15/09/2009 08:14:04 PM
- 664 Views
Um.
14/09/2009 11:28:28 PM
- 723 Views
LOL
15/09/2009 09:29:16 PM
- 653 Views
Really? Because this was a rather atypical debate, honestly.
15/09/2009 09:43:13 PM
- 528 Views
Well, I can pretend if you want me to
15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM
- 1097 Views
I happen to find it all extremely interesting
15/09/2009 10:23:19 PM
- 579 Views
There are some places you can go that discuss the creationist ideas
15/09/2009 10:58:25 PM
- 740 Views