When I don't have to explain the Fourth Amendment to you, lecture me on your lectures.
Joel Send a noteboard - 25/11/2010 12:56:35 PM
I am well aware that in your eyes the only possible action China can pursue in any case is the most evil possible. However, those of us who prefer to reside in reality view their actions in a somewhat more rational light. I daresay that I'm just as familiar with Chinese policy as you are--perhaps significantly more, considering several of my grades depend on it.
It turns out that China doesn't have the strong religious motivations agains homosexuality that the vast majority of the signers do. I doubt their one-child policy is the reason. I wondered what their motivation was: whether it was political, cultural, or something else besides. Unfortunately, "BECAUSE THEY'RE EVIL" is not valid reasoning in the real world.
It turns out that China doesn't have the strong religious motivations agains homosexuality that the vast majority of the signers do. I doubt their one-child policy is the reason. I wondered what their motivation was: whether it was political, cultural, or something else besides. Unfortunately, "BECAUSE THEY'RE EVIL" is not valid reasoning in the real world.
chandra covered it well: In China, the different is the enemy of the people. This isn't about jingoism, currency valuation or whose flag flies over what territory. How often do I complain about Brazil or India? Chinas rulers are not nice, and while Western, even AMERICAN leaders are far from perfect, I'd still much rather they call the shots than China. I've been criticizing US foreign policy since before you were born, so please don't talk down to me about two years of studying. If that made you an expert you'd be conducting diplomacy instead of reading about people who do.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 25/11/2010 at 12:58:29 PM
UN votes to allow discrimination against sexual minorities (i.e. homosexuals)
24/11/2010 02:11:44 AM
- 1053 Views
Pretty appalling, but also rather unsurprising on who voted which way. *NM*
24/11/2010 02:32:37 AM
- 323 Views
Some surprises, though.
24/11/2010 02:52:17 AM
- 836 Views
I agree about South Africa - they have legal gay marriage!
24/11/2010 11:04:10 AM
- 716 Views
Yeah, but when they brought that in they didn't have Jacob Zuma for president. *NM*
24/11/2010 02:35:56 PM
- 318 Views
I was surprised to see China there. *NM*
24/11/2010 03:06:12 AM
- 298 Views
Why? Their exemplary record on Civil Rights?
24/11/2010 08:08:57 PM
- 729 Views
When you return from vacationing in the land of False Dichotomy, let me know.
24/11/2010 11:36:08 PM
- 600 Views
Re: Oh yeah.
25/11/2010 12:13:28 AM
- 636 Views
As noted, the difference is we don't execute people for it, nor condone those who do.
25/11/2010 01:01:47 PM
- 858 Views
When I don't have to explain the Fourth Amendment to you, lecture me on your lectures.
25/11/2010 12:56:35 PM
- 835 Views
Very sad if not a shock. Democracy doesn't work people!
24/11/2010 11:23:42 AM
- 739 Views
The Law and Justice isn't in power anymore on any level, remember?
24/11/2010 02:29:41 PM
- 772 Views
Very simplistic generalisation here, perhaps you should correct it *NM*
24/11/2010 07:08:54 PM
- 415 Views
He said "tend to", not "are". *NM*
24/11/2010 07:11:47 PM
- 435 Views
It was the inference at a continent level, that I felt was very simplistic.
24/11/2010 07:17:28 PM
- 667 Views
Generalizations are inherently simplified; that doesn't make them inaccurate.
24/11/2010 09:07:24 PM
- 737 Views
It is correct, thank you for your concern though *NM*
24/11/2010 07:58:46 PM
- 305 Views
I disagree
24/11/2010 08:10:11 PM
- 645 Views
Then you are wrong
24/11/2010 08:19:51 PM
- 637 Views
Am I wrong, or are you?
24/11/2010 08:28:26 PM
- 762 Views
You are
24/11/2010 08:41:35 PM
- 601 Views
You did not read my post completely
24/11/2010 08:47:07 PM
- 726 Views
I did
24/11/2010 08:56:39 PM
- 679 Views
Chiming in ONLY because I've gotten so much crap for generalizations over the years.
24/11/2010 09:07:12 PM
- 683 Views
How can such tiny stupid cow states have the same amount of votes we do? Disgusting. *NM*
24/11/2010 02:50:10 PM
- 325 Views
Suddenly "Political Correctness" isn't such a dirty word.
24/11/2010 06:50:06 PM
- 729 Views
I always thought that political correctness was where people used euphemisms
24/11/2010 07:15:16 PM
- 670 Views
In practice it usually means they use non-offensive meaningless euphemisms lest someone object.
24/11/2010 08:25:24 PM
- 760 Views
Implying that people are acceptable the way they seems to be politically correct.
24/11/2010 09:22:58 PM
- 759 Views
definitely. So many people are plain rude and try to justify it with being "more honest"
25/11/2010 03:00:42 AM
- 717 Views
Pretty sad, and surprising that so many nations abstained when they could've swung the vote.
24/11/2010 08:34:58 PM
- 757 Views
Do you ever get tired of your hyperbole?
24/11/2010 09:48:21 PM
- 739 Views
Of course not, it's a legitimate rhetorical device if not used (or taken) literally.
25/11/2010 12:38:55 PM
- 864 Views
Biggest surprise is Chavez. Going against Ahmadinejad, Hu, and Putin? Guess he didn't get the memo. *NM*
25/11/2010 03:36:04 AM
- 405 Views
it is? I didn't see it as a big suprise
25/11/2010 11:03:40 AM
- 825 Views
If you don't stop saying things with which I agree I'm going to think one of us is sick.
25/11/2010 01:10:27 PM
- 1063 Views