And as for the 8000 lightyears argument, I have to disagree with Craig, I do think astronomy is relevant in the discussion. But the way that argument is presented is idiotic. If creationists actually believed that there were objects 8000 lightyears away whose light is reaching the earth only now, they wouldn't be creationists to begin with.
I don't actually disagree that the point has some relevance in the context of the discussion. I was merely pointing out that, since the author didn't actually give any context whilst adding that as an "argument to support evolution," it was a worthless addition. Anyway it's not so much an "argument to support evolution" as it is an "argument to dispute creationism." Just another nitpick at the shitty writing.
I am made of poison.
I can't even believe this.
13/09/2009 07:40:02 PM
- 1042 Views
Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
13/09/2009 07:43:15 PM
- 573 Views
Re: Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
13/09/2009 10:28:42 PM
- 670 Views
That is one amazingly stupid article...
13/09/2009 08:04:47 PM
- 613 Views
The author used the phrase "proven theories." Ergo, their argument is invalid. *NM*
14/09/2009 01:11:51 AM
- 316 Views
seriously. there's no such thing as a truly proven theory
14/09/2009 01:52:30 AM
- 583 Views
Re: definition of "theory"
14/09/2009 04:49:13 AM
- 639 Views
I can't really tell
14/09/2009 08:14:14 PM
- 621 Views
I think you are getting workedup over nothing
14/09/2009 09:57:22 PM
- 773 Views
That's... not exactly it.
14/09/2009 10:33:02 PM
- 534 Views
not that is exactly it
14/09/2009 11:10:52 PM
- 780 Views
No, Craig is quite right.
14/09/2009 11:21:11 PM
- 584 Views
No you just happen to wrong with him
15/09/2009 01:14:16 AM
- 574 Views
Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM
- 778 Views
Re: Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM
- 728 Views
To butt in for a second...
15/09/2009 07:38:05 PM
- 602 Views
'Fraid not.
14/09/2009 11:24:00 PM
- 585 Views
It's not, it's supposed to be relatively decent - mainstream conservative newspaper. *NM*
14/09/2009 11:28:44 PM
- 276 Views
Re: 'Fraid not.
15/09/2009 01:21:14 AM
- 579 Views
15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM
- 674 Views
completely aside from this argument you guys have here...
15/09/2009 05:02:21 AM
- 618 Views
Interrupter!
15/09/2009 06:11:40 AM
- 561 Views
Re: Interrupter!
15/09/2009 06:54:56 AM
- 667 Views
One brain C4, coming up...
15/09/2009 12:00:26 PM
- 614 Views
The age of the universe is an important point in the creationist argument
15/09/2009 05:53:41 PM
- 650 Views
Exactly. So it was in the wrong column.
15/09/2009 07:58:15 PM
- 599 Views
what I think has been lost in the debate is it looks like it will be a good movie
15/09/2009 08:14:04 PM
- 663 Views
Um.
14/09/2009 11:28:28 PM
- 722 Views
LOL
15/09/2009 09:29:16 PM
- 653 Views
Really? Because this was a rather atypical debate, honestly.
15/09/2009 09:43:13 PM
- 528 Views
Well, I can pretend if you want me to
15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM
- 1097 Views
I happen to find it all extremely interesting
15/09/2009 10:23:19 PM
- 579 Views
There are some places you can go that discuss the creationist ideas
15/09/2009 10:58:25 PM
- 739 Views