Active Users:664 Time:25/11/2024 05:49:22 AM
*waves* Hi! *NM* Great Lord of Chaos Send a noteboard - 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM
It was the family friendly argument at WOT that brought the swear filter. We've been rather open about it here at RAFO so far, at least until someone takes it to ridiculous degrees. I don't get what the difference between f*ck and fuck's supposed to be anyway.
Ὦ ξεῖν', ἀγγέλλειν Λακεδαιμονίοις ὅτι τῇδε
κείμεθα, τοῖς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.
Reply to message
Can we swear at RAFO? - 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM 955 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear. - 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM 577 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk??? - 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM 611 Views
Delicate? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:06:19 AM 339 Views
Yes? - 22/11/2010 05:37:36 AM 461 Views
I don't know, can you? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:54:20 AM 358 Views
Why not try it an find out. *NM* - 22/11/2010 06:05:35 AM 318 Views
hell to the fuck yes! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:51:07 AM 309 Views
I can't think of underage users - 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM 661 Views
Well - 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM 671 Views
That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM 576 Views
Re: That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 12:11:25 PM 702 Views
THANK YOU! *hugs* - 22/11/2010 12:28:38 PM 520 Views
Back off! - 22/11/2010 12:31:13 PM 572 Views
'SOK: I hugged a man (in public)... - 22/11/2010 12:35:16 PM 452 Views
I never had that issue. - 22/11/2010 05:38:59 PM 593 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 05:53:24 PM 371 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches. - 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM 621 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles? - 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM 501 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient? - 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM 653 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb - 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM 582 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy. - 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM 691 Views
Subroutines such as what? - 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM 891 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now. - 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM 871 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless... - 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM 566 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none. - 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM 608 Views
well... - 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM 618 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM 585 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM 561 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people. - 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM 646 Views
new people is not the same as children. *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM 305 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college. - 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM 605 Views
Please. - 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM 614 Views
I resent that. - 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM 473 Views
Sadface. *NM* - 23/11/2010 10:12:31 PM 316 Views
... and later additions like Ghavrel? - 23/11/2010 10:24:28 PM 663 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles - 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM 588 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck - 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM 573 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. - 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM 728 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE. - 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM 612 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 09:36:20 PM 592 Views
Who said anything about regulation? - 23/11/2010 01:45:21 AM 626 Views
I love how you made Adam into a positive - 22/11/2010 05:40:33 PM 633 Views
For good or ill, Adam was very much a part of wotmania. - 22/11/2010 07:40:03 PM 626 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM 316 Views
Hey there! - 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM 754 Views
A few honest answers. - 22/11/2010 10:54:30 PM 511 Views
Thanks - 22/11/2010 11:07:00 PM 523 Views
Perfectly alright. *NM* - 22/11/2010 11:12:43 PM 195 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though. - 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM 652 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM 289 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth - 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM 550 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though. - 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM 600 Views
*sniggers* - 24/11/2010 02:27:22 PM 457 Views
Has anyone actually voiced that concern? - 24/11/2010 02:28:23 PM 570 Views
yes. - 22/11/2010 12:05:23 PM 505 Views
True. - 22/11/2010 06:45:58 PM 566 Views
I love how the original poster hasn't responded to any of this. - 23/11/2010 03:11:58 AM 582 Views
Probably still in shock. - 23/11/2010 01:52:01 PM 588 Views

Reply to Message