Re: *contemplates grave consequences for theoretical random newbies*
Legolas Send a noteboard - 14/11/2010 01:31:07 AM
How have I been? Good, bad, elated, defeated, renewed, beat down, tired, full of energy. It's been a super-duper-long time since I was around so it's difficult to answer that question.
Yeah, makes sense. I don't even know how long it's been - that you were around regularly, anyway - but a lot would have happened in that time.
I guess I could just say "fine".
Well, you know, the important part is how you are now, right?
Still alive? Bitter and angry? Optimistic? Yes to all.
... though that does sound like just "fine" doesn't cut it at the moment. Sorry to hear that.
I still have the same job that I did the last time I was around, which is a good thing since it isn't a terrible job and pays the bills.
I have a 3rd grader instead of an infant.
How time does fly...
I'm getting divorced from another former wotmaniac.
Oh, that sucks. Well, possibly not from where you're standing at the moment, but you know what I mean, sorry to hear it didn't work out between you guys.
I haven't read the new book yet. I know that makes me a loser, but I'm busy.
Nah. People here care a lot less about WoT than they once did. I'm fairly sure ironclad still hasn't read any of them, and he probably isn't the only one anymore.
I don't know if even half of the community board regulars nowadays still read new WoT books as they come out. How have you been?
Dated one wotmaniac, broke up, dated another (not sure how well you knew either, though), broke up as well, a lot does happen in however many years.
But pretty good on the whole. 
WTF? RAFO doesn't have a chat?
- 14/11/2010 12:55:00 AM
1050 Views
Wow, blast from the past there... assuming it's you? *NM*
- 14/11/2010 01:06:32 AM
374 Views
Who else would it be?
- 14/11/2010 01:10:26 AM
711 Views
I dunno, you never know if some random newbie reuses an old name? 
- 14/11/2010 01:14:23 AM
647 Views
- 14/11/2010 01:14:23 AM
647 Views
*contemplates grave consequences for theoretical random newbies*
- 14/11/2010 01:20:07 AM
664 Views
Re: *contemplates grave consequences for theoretical random newbies*
- 14/11/2010 01:31:07 AM
620 Views
Nope, but there are multiple Skype chats dedicated to RAFO.
- 14/11/2010 01:21:16 AM
621 Views
Because Skype is not made for permanent chatrooms and we get tired of waiting days for a message. *NM*
- 14/11/2010 02:30:09 AM
265 Views
No? I would say it kind of is, actually.
- 14/11/2010 06:01:25 AM
591 Views
IRC is better.
- 14/11/2010 06:38:02 AM
607 Views
- 14/11/2010 06:38:02 AM
607 Views
A whole lot has to do with how often you log in to Skype.
- 14/11/2010 02:59:45 PM
667 Views
Thank you for proving my point. Most people have no interest in logging in daily. *NM*
- 14/11/2010 10:25:49 PM
278 Views
Then I dare say there's no problem.
- 15/11/2010 01:16:40 AM
572 Views
So you only care about people who have the ability to log in every day?
- 15/11/2010 01:41:06 AM
742 Views
"Ability"?
- 15/11/2010 01:09:15 PM
711 Views
Just how hard is getting mIRC and setting up a channel? *NM*
- 15/11/2010 01:31:33 PM
320 Views
*NM*
- 15/11/2010 01:31:33 PM
320 Views
Sometimes it seems like the REAL complaint is that no one else makes it as effortless as Mike did
- 15/11/2010 02:07:52 PM
479 Views
- 15/11/2010 02:07:52 PM
479 Views
*sigh
- 14/11/2010 02:31:40 AM
680 Views
I feel shame for you. *NM*
- 14/11/2010 02:35:20 AM
318 Views
why? *NM*
- 16/11/2010 04:42:01 PM
327 Views
That you even went to Skype chat with them and found out. *shudders*
- 16/11/2010 05:39:41 PM
558 Views
RAFO also doesn't have a Huckleberry Finn, but it's still an okay distraction. *NM*
- 14/11/2010 03:12:01 PM
322 Views
*NM*
New decade, new priorities it seems, Jodi
- 15/11/2010 03:19:33 AM
566 Views
- 15/11/2010 03:19:33 AM
566 Views