Active Users:1149 Time:23/11/2024 12:28:40 AM
Ithat was meant to be an eidt. oh well random thoughts Send a noteboard - 15/09/2009 01:23:36 AM
It's a shittily written article.


The only thing I see shitty is the shallowness of the criticism.

* Space

Objects in space, which are more than 8,000 light years away, can be seen from earth.

This is under the category "Arguments to support evolution." What the bloody blue blazes does that have to do with anything?


See this is people who laugh at the other side but don't understand the issues themselves come in.

This is an important point against the argument that the universe is only 6,000 years old. How can that be when some of the light reaching the earth took more then 8,000 years to get here?

I wouldn't put it at the top of my list but it does have something to with the issue and it is easier for the layperson to understand then most dating methods.

Maybe this is a joke newspaper in the UK - I'm not familiar with it, I just recognize the name. But this is shoddy "journalism," about something that's already a hot-button topic.


Did you believe it was meant to settle the issue instead of just give some highlights?

Now if you really want me to "refute any of the claims made by creationist outside of [my] semantics issue," I could go to town. But really I thought the whole article was stupid, but didn't feel like spending too much time on it, so I made one pithy comment and moved on. ~shrug~


yet you are still in the discussion haven't shown any knowledge of the issue as of yet.

I can do a fine job refuting creationism myself and I can do it without simply pointing and laughing at people.
Reply to message
I can't even believe this. - 13/09/2009 07:40:02 PM 1042 Views
Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place. - 13/09/2009 07:43:15 PM 574 Views
Re: Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place. - 13/09/2009 10:28:42 PM 670 Views
That is one amazingly stupid article... - 13/09/2009 08:04:47 PM 613 Views
ditto *NM* - 13/09/2009 08:11:45 PM 304 Views
Re: ditto - 13/09/2009 10:01:54 PM 690 Views
wow why a witty and well thought out rebuttal. - 14/09/2009 10:02:14 PM 591 Views
Ugh. Interesting subject, awful article. - 13/09/2009 08:27:15 PM 640 Views
Re: I can't even believe this. - 13/09/2009 09:05:45 PM 593 Views
Re: I can't even believe this. - 13/09/2009 10:33:47 PM 528 Views
I'd agree with you, if... - 13/09/2009 10:36:07 PM 587 Views
*sigh* People bashing other people. - 13/09/2009 10:02:54 PM 660 Views
The author used the phrase "proven theories." Ergo, their argument is invalid. *NM* - 14/09/2009 01:11:51 AM 316 Views
seriously. there's no such thing as a truly proven theory - 14/09/2009 01:52:30 AM 583 Views
Re: definition of "theory" - 14/09/2009 04:49:13 AM 639 Views
Re: definition of "theory" - 14/09/2009 08:56:48 AM 734 Views
I can't really tell - 14/09/2009 08:14:14 PM 621 Views
Re: I think I was agreeing with you, yes *NM* - 15/09/2009 12:37:00 AM 291 Views
Oh, good. I'll let you live. *NM* - 15/09/2009 01:55:49 AM 344 Views
I think you are getting workedup over nothing - 14/09/2009 09:57:22 PM 773 Views
That's... not exactly it. - 14/09/2009 10:33:02 PM 534 Views
not that is exactly it - 14/09/2009 11:10:52 PM 780 Views
No, Craig is quite right. - 14/09/2009 11:21:11 PM 585 Views
Heh. You were much more diplomatic about it than I was. *NM* - 14/09/2009 11:24:41 PM 341 Views
No you just happen to wrong with him - 15/09/2009 01:14:16 AM 574 Views
Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press... - 15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM 778 Views
Re: Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press... - 15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM 728 Views
To butt in for a second... - 15/09/2009 07:38:05 PM 602 Views
'Fraid not. - 14/09/2009 11:24:00 PM 586 Views
Re: 'Fraid not. - 15/09/2009 01:21:14 AM 579 Views
Re: 'Fraid not. - 15/09/2009 01:22:59 AM 703 Views
Ithat was meant to be an eidt. oh well - 15/09/2009 01:23:36 AM 646 Views
- 15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM 674 Views
completely aside from this argument you guys have here... - 15/09/2009 05:02:21 AM 618 Views
Interrupter! - 15/09/2009 06:11:40 AM 561 Views
Re: Interrupter! - 15/09/2009 06:54:56 AM 667 Views
One brain C4, coming up... - 15/09/2009 12:00:26 PM 614 Views
Nicely put - 15/09/2009 03:48:42 PM 548 Views
Yes, I know. - 15/09/2009 04:55:22 PM 690 Views
PFt - 15/09/2009 04:56:19 PM 565 Views
Are you telling me I am getting predictable? - 15/09/2009 04:58:59 PM 651 Views
The age of the universe is an important point in the creationist argument - 15/09/2009 05:53:41 PM 650 Views
Exactly. So it was in the wrong column. - 15/09/2009 07:58:15 PM 599 Views
what I think has been lost in the debate is it looks like it will be a good movie - 15/09/2009 08:14:04 PM 663 Views
That, I can agree with. *NM* - 15/09/2009 08:22:44 PM 313 Views
Um. - 14/09/2009 11:28:28 PM 723 Views
LOL - 15/09/2009 09:29:16 PM 653 Views
Really? Because this was a rather atypical debate, honestly. - 15/09/2009 09:43:13 PM 528 Views
Heh. - 15/09/2009 09:54:00 PM 667 Views
Well, I can pretend if you want me to - 15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM 1097 Views
I happen to find it all extremely interesting - 15/09/2009 10:23:19 PM 579 Views
Re: I happen to find it all extremely interesting - 15/09/2009 10:36:14 PM 594 Views
There are some places you can go that discuss the creationist ideas - 15/09/2009 10:58:25 PM 740 Views
Having just been to the Creationist Museum last Monday - 16/09/2009 12:00:12 AM 870 Views
All hail the Flying Spaghetti Monster! - 16/09/2009 06:03:20 AM 576 Views

Reply to Message