Active Users:334 Time:09/04/2025 05:43:58 AM
i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 14/09/2009 07:50:27 PM
It's an empty placeholder for an explanation. Science at least provides a partial explanation of the unknown by describing the boundaries of what we know. If you say the soul is whatever human qualities haven't yet been discovered by science, then the soul theory is falsified every time a scientific discovery about humanity is made.


I'm just saying a soul is an explanation, if an unprovable one (as things stand). Think of it less as a "scientific theory" and more of a "philosophic idea"
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
Do you think there's some kind of spiritual substance in the universe? - 14/09/2009 02:42:22 PM 886 Views
no, it is mostly hydrogen *NM* - 14/09/2009 02:43:47 PM 273 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:01:32 PM 252 Views
not a chance *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:23:02 PM 253 Views
yes (in as much that we could choose to define it that way) - 14/09/2009 03:31:40 PM 683 Views
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness. - 14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM 619 Views
aaah but who says we can percieve all there is to percieve in relation to our persons? - 14/09/2009 04:14:08 PM 593 Views
But merely positing a soul (as a spiritual substance) doesn't actually explain anything. - 14/09/2009 07:46:35 PM 561 Views
i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 07:50:27 PM 620 Views
Re: i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 08:05:41 PM 622 Views
Carts and horses. - 18/09/2009 12:10:22 PM 752 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 05:14:33 PM 255 Views
Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 05:27:09 PM 621 Views
Re: Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 06:20:45 PM 606 Views
I think there is definitely a spiritual force that underlies the unity of all things - 14/09/2009 06:11:01 PM 644 Views
That sounds very like gnosticism in many ways. - 18/09/2009 12:17:51 PM 651 Views
No. *NM* - 14/09/2009 07:06:59 PM 247 Views
define "spiritual'. - 14/09/2009 07:36:18 PM 572 Views
Rum. - 14/09/2009 08:25:46 PM 632 Views
YES! *NM* - 16/09/2009 02:10:55 PM 280 Views
How are we not married? *NM* - 19/09/2009 04:10:13 AM 254 Views
Bigamy laws. *NM* - 19/09/2009 03:49:59 PM 239 Views
My Achilles heel! *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:30:06 PM 260 Views
Timing *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:51:37 PM 253 Views
My Achilles ankle! *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:14:42 PM 268 Views
Your Face. *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:21:44 PM 254 Views
My Achilles face! - 07/10/2009 09:40:36 PM 523 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:09:16 PM 240 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:31:14 PM 256 Views
Yes, vodka. *NM* - 14/09/2009 10:02:19 PM 239 Views
Substance? - 14/09/2009 10:08:04 PM 589 Views
Yeah, boobs. - 15/09/2009 01:51:44 AM 580 Views
Not the way I'd put it, as jh notes, but unquestionably. - 15/09/2009 03:17:22 PM 614 Views
Look, don't put words in my mouth. - 15/09/2009 04:50:13 PM 637 Views
Sorry. - 15/09/2009 05:14:10 PM 562 Views
Re: Sorry. - 17/09/2009 09:20:58 PM 545 Views
People over-complicate this, it's a sort of animal abuse - 15/09/2009 09:03:01 PM 603 Views
Nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 01:57:44 AM 236 Views
Very nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 06:57:57 PM 232 Views
A sublte nuance most modern materialists miss. - 18/09/2009 12:21:33 PM 824 Views
I think there may be platonic forms defining purpose - 16/09/2009 06:27:36 AM 529 Views
The material universe precludes a purely natural cause. - 18/09/2009 12:04:16 PM 710 Views
One little correction - 20/09/2009 12:34:13 AM 706 Views
Nay. - 20/09/2009 07:04:47 AM 534 Views
Re: Nay. - 07/10/2009 11:55:28 AM 641 Views

Reply to Message