Re: Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive?
Lordling Send a noteboard - 14/09/2009 06:20:45 PM
it generally is in debates...
My philosophy book tells that "substance" (substanssi) means the basic matter of reality; autonomously existing, the ultimate essence of a being. And other things that are hard to translate.
I don't see why you couldn't think that the ultimate essence of the world is spiritual. If some sort of God existed, he'd be spiritual.
Do you think there's some kind of spiritual substance in the universe?
14/09/2009 02:42:22 PM
- 812 Views
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness.
14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM
- 548 Views
aaah but who says we can percieve all there is to percieve in relation to our persons?
14/09/2009 04:14:08 PM
- 508 Views
But merely positing a soul (as a spiritual substance) doesn't actually explain anything.
14/09/2009 07:46:35 PM
- 486 Views
i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul"
14/09/2009 07:50:27 PM
- 544 Views
Re: i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul"
14/09/2009 08:05:41 PM
- 543 Views
Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive?
14/09/2009 05:27:09 PM
- 541 Views
Re: Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive?
14/09/2009 06:20:45 PM
- 522 Views
I think there is definitely a spiritual force that underlies the unity of all things
14/09/2009 06:11:01 PM
- 558 Views
Rum.
14/09/2009 08:25:46 PM
- 547 Views
YES! *NM*
16/09/2009 02:10:55 PM
- 252 Views
How are we not married? *NM*
19/09/2009 04:10:13 AM
- 226 Views
Not the way I'd put it, as jh notes, but unquestionably.
15/09/2009 03:17:22 PM
- 534 Views
The material universe precludes a purely natural cause.
18/09/2009 12:04:16 PM
- 613 Views
One little correction
20/09/2009 12:34:13 AM
- 622 Views
That makes it more complex, but I agree the same basic problem persists.
07/10/2009 12:11:07 PM
- 651 Views