Re: Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive?
Lordling Send a noteboard - 14/09/2009 06:20:45 PM
it generally is in debates...
My philosophy book tells that "substance" (substanssi) means the basic matter of reality; autonomously existing, the ultimate essence of a being. And other things that are hard to translate.
I don't see why you couldn't think that the ultimate essence of the world is spiritual. If some sort of God existed, he'd be spiritual.
Do you think there's some kind of spiritual substance in the universe?
14/09/2009 02:42:22 PM
- 886 Views
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness.
14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM
- 620 Views
aaah but who says we can percieve all there is to percieve in relation to our persons?
14/09/2009 04:14:08 PM
- 593 Views
But merely positing a soul (as a spiritual substance) doesn't actually explain anything.
14/09/2009 07:46:35 PM
- 561 Views
i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul"
14/09/2009 07:50:27 PM
- 620 Views
Re: i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul"
14/09/2009 08:05:41 PM
- 622 Views
Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive?
14/09/2009 05:27:09 PM
- 621 Views
Re: Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive?
14/09/2009 06:20:45 PM
- 607 Views
I think there is definitely a spiritual force that underlies the unity of all things
14/09/2009 06:11:01 PM
- 645 Views
Rum.
14/09/2009 08:25:46 PM
- 632 Views
YES! *NM*
16/09/2009 02:10:55 PM
- 280 Views
How are we not married?
*NM*
19/09/2009 04:10:13 AM
- 254 Views

Not the way I'd put it, as jh notes, but unquestionably.
15/09/2009 03:17:22 PM
- 614 Views
The material universe precludes a purely natural cause.
18/09/2009 12:04:16 PM
- 711 Views
One little correction
20/09/2009 12:34:13 AM
- 706 Views
That makes it more complex, but I agree the same basic problem persists.
07/10/2009 12:11:07 PM
- 747 Views