Active Users:832 Time:23/12/2024 02:45:18 AM
SSDs have a high failure rate when they are new or you try out new firmware Roland00 Send a noteboard - 23/10/2010 05:24:41 AM
And also the whole lack of recoverability bit.


Simple answer is don't buy an SSD that is brand new, and don't always try out new firmware. The Crucial SSD is now 7 months old, it has been tested, and is is now reliable (it had issues in the first month, these were fixed, this is why you don't want to be an early adopter.)

Also just because a drive has new firmware doesn't mean you should update it for the sake of it being new. If it isn't broke don't fix it.

If you do try out new firmware use this software. This is a free version of Acronis True Image you get for free if you have a western digital hard drive. You can always make an image/ghost of your hard drive and if something did happen you can load it back instantly.
http://support.wdc.com/product/downloaddetail.asp?swid=119

------------------------------------------------

Now SSD rarely fail if you aren't an early adopter or trying out a new firmware, they have a much higher MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) than traditional hard drives.
Reply to message
My computer died last night - 22/10/2010 04:04:46 AM 725 Views
My sympathies. 6 years is a good life though. You should be proud! *NM* - 22/10/2010 06:16:13 AM 273 Views
I would just get a new one - 22/10/2010 06:58:02 AM 588 Views
6 years old? Don't just replace the HD - build a new one, if you have the cash. - 22/10/2010 01:35:08 PM 569 Views
Re: 6 years old? Don't just replace the HD - build a new one, if you have the cash. - 22/10/2010 05:30:03 PM 662 Views
Huh? - 23/10/2010 04:24:24 AM 587 Views
My deepest condolences. - 22/10/2010 01:39:01 PM 569 Views
I'm with Morgawse - 22/10/2010 04:58:39 PM 529 Views
If it is 6 years old get a new one *NM* - 22/10/2010 05:23:39 PM 278 Views
OK, you guys are probably right - 22/10/2010 05:51:23 PM 560 Views
Re: OK, you guys are probably right - 22/10/2010 06:38:49 PM 717 Views
Re: OK, you guys are probably right - 22/10/2010 06:53:56 PM 556 Views
One thing about that site, though - 22/10/2010 06:57:56 PM 539 Views
Re: One thing about that site, though - 22/10/2010 07:01:54 PM 576 Views
What he said. - 24/10/2010 09:01:49 AM 639 Views
There is no motherboard that can accept both socket types - 24/10/2010 01:47:39 PM 539 Views
If you're trying to conserve money, don't bother with the SSD. - 22/10/2010 06:40:14 PM 576 Views
Re: If you're trying to conserve money, don't bother with the SSD. - 22/10/2010 06:56:58 PM 547 Views
If you're impatient, you'll notice the impact of the extra ram a lot more than the ssd. *NM* - 22/10/2010 06:58:56 PM 272 Views
Well it would help with switching between programs - 22/10/2010 07:03:47 PM 587 Views
Bullshit, the SSD will make more of a difference than the extra memory - 23/10/2010 04:38:44 AM 636 Views
...not until you hit the reported astronomically high failure rate for SSDs, at least. - 23/10/2010 05:01:40 AM 547 Views
SSDs have a high failure rate when they are new or you try out new firmware - 23/10/2010 05:24:41 AM 618 Views
Go with an i5 750/760 or an i7 860/870 - 23/10/2010 04:26:03 AM 605 Views
Also don't worry about sata 6.0 Gbps *NM* - 23/10/2010 04:26:24 AM 294 Views
A power surge is likely to corrupt your RAM as well, and possibly motherboard components. *NM* - 22/10/2010 06:39:06 PM 276 Views
I tested the RAM, it's fine. - 22/10/2010 07:00:27 PM 599 Views

Reply to Message