Re: If you're trying to conserve money, don't bother with the SSD.
BlackAdder Send a noteboard - 22/10/2010 06:56:58 PM
It's nice, it's shiny, but really, you don't need it. If you want to spend that money spend it on double the ram instead.
Hmm, OK. Fox also suggested getting rid of the SSD so maybe you two are on to something. But like I said, I'm rather impatient, so I may just end up keeping it
My computer died last night
22/10/2010 04:04:46 AM
- 714 Views
My sympathies. 6 years is a good life though. You should be proud! *NM*
22/10/2010 06:16:13 AM
- 267 Views
6 years old? Don't just replace the HD - build a new one, if you have the cash.
22/10/2010 01:35:08 PM
- 559 Views
Re: 6 years old? Don't just replace the HD - build a new one, if you have the cash.
22/10/2010 05:30:03 PM
- 654 Views
OK, you guys are probably right
22/10/2010 05:51:23 PM
- 551 Views
Re: OK, you guys are probably right
22/10/2010 06:38:49 PM
- 704 Views
Re: OK, you guys are probably right
22/10/2010 06:53:56 PM
- 544 Views
If you're trying to conserve money, don't bother with the SSD.
22/10/2010 06:40:14 PM
- 564 Views
Re: If you're trying to conserve money, don't bother with the SSD.
22/10/2010 06:56:58 PM
- 539 Views
If you're impatient, you'll notice the impact of the extra ram a lot more than the ssd. *NM*
22/10/2010 06:58:56 PM
- 268 Views
Bullshit, the SSD will make more of a difference than the extra memory
23/10/2010 04:38:44 AM
- 631 Views
...not until you hit the reported astronomically high failure rate for SSDs, at least.
23/10/2010 05:01:40 AM
- 539 Views
SSDs have a high failure rate when they are new or you try out new firmware
23/10/2010 05:24:41 AM
- 606 Views
A power surge is likely to corrupt your RAM as well, and possibly motherboard components. *NM*
22/10/2010 06:39:06 PM
- 272 Views