Or something.
what your standing was on wotmania doesn't matter any more.
I disagree. I consider each person's perception as a RAFOnaut to be a continuation of their wotmania history. If you spent 8 to 10 years at wotmania and you've now been visiting RAFO for over a year, people will judge you for the 9 to 11 years of content you've contributed and relationships you've been a part of. Not just the previous one year. You can add onto your history from the previous site, but not erase it. RAFO didn't give everyone a fresh slate in which all preconceived notions about them were abandoned. Not to say people can't be forgiven for who they were, have their levels or respect rise or fall, but that could be true of a person's 8th year at wotmania compared to their 5th as much as it would their first year at RAFO compared to their last at wotmania.
So to say that who you were at wotmania doesn't matter or is invalidated by RAFO's existence is false. If someone who was a recognized veteran of wotmania were to post on RAFO for the first time tomorrow, we would all embrace them as who we knew them to be.
'Cos, well, I'm kind of a a lot of the time now. I'm not sure why, but I know I choose my words less carefully and am less inclined to give people the benefit. Maybe too much of the happy warrior, been in enough online arguments they've become an end in themselves. Maybe the stuff that went down the last year of wotmania pissed me off more than I'm willing to admit even to myself.
I know if it were as simple as just creating a chat I wouldn't be worried about it. There's a big part of me that wouldn't mind going back to '05; my uncle and four more of my dogs were still alive. That ain't how life works though, and it may be time we all came to terms with the fact that while we may have left the problems unique to wotmania, we brought those of our own making with us to RAFO.
For the record and what it's worth, I agree with both of you to some extent. RAFO allowed the opportunity to shake up the hierarchy a bit; old Admins left or became users, and new Admins took their place, so there was more give and take and a lot more chances to try new things since we were writing a new playbook. On the other hand, like you say, people aren't just going to forget years of personal interaction at wotmania, hence there were a few minor instances of people comparing length (of membership, geez! )
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Chat
10/10/2010 07:34:44 AM
- 980 Views
I've already had several days like that. Yet people keep insisting RAFO is better without chat. *NM*
10/10/2010 05:29:46 PM
- 346 Views
When chat used to be down for long stretches, everyone would just pile into AIM chat.
10/10/2010 06:54:33 PM
- 615 Views
Which they could easily do with Skype and get voice, yet no one does.
10/10/2010 10:56:55 PM
- 641 Views
The idea of voice chat creeps me out on so many levels *NM*
11/10/2010 12:34:22 AM
- 599 Views
Is that why the Edinburgh gathering pics are always nothing but sign language and dirty gestures? *NM*
11/10/2010 10:36:00 PM
- 335 Views
The group that is popularized as being a part of that is not enticing to long standing wotmaniacs. *NM*
11/10/2010 03:29:57 AM
- 357 Views
Then that, again, seems a problem that coding can't solve.
11/10/2010 07:33:32 AM
- 634 Views
I don't think most want to download another program when they had it so easy before.
11/10/2010 10:39:55 PM
- 654 Views
Honestly, I think the "one time event" is the biggest problem.
12/10/2010 04:20:04 AM
- 651 Views
I disagree. I don't think enough people think it worth the effort to deal with Skype.
12/10/2010 04:28:21 AM
- 562 Views
What effort?
12/10/2010 04:38:42 AM
- 539 Views
Re:
12/10/2010 11:00:56 PM
- 433 Views
Then where are they?
13/10/2010 04:00:46 AM
- 509 Views
You have a faulty memory. Chat was incredibly active as late as 2007.
13/10/2010 04:24:25 AM
- 569 Views
Again, that's people, and not/having Chat won't change that.
13/10/2010 04:45:40 AM
- 572 Views
Incorrect
13/10/2010 04:58:30 AM
- 585 Views
Initially only the person who started it can boot.
13/10/2010 05:12:27 AM
- 650 Views
Re: Initially only the person who started it can boot.
13/10/2010 02:45:50 PM
- 532 Views
Sounds right; don't really know much about The Tavern except that's all in character.
14/10/2010 04:54:06 AM
- 582 Views
What do you mean where are they? There isn't a chat linked to the site.
13/10/2010 10:44:10 PM
- 626 Views
So?
14/10/2010 04:52:37 AM
- 588 Views
I have to admit that I highly doubt I would ever participate if a revived chat were installed
13/10/2010 05:08:38 AM
- 571 Views
Most of the group consists of long-standing Wotmaniacs, so. *NM*
12/10/2010 05:25:39 AM
- 321 Views
I probably didn't phrase that right. Maybe an -er after long and an "in good" before standing.
12/10/2010 11:02:30 PM
- 604 Views
Plenty of people who've been around as long as you, and plenty in good standing. *NM*
13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM
- 305 Views
I see that my comments are being interpeted as a blanket insult to all parties involved...
13/10/2010 11:09:09 PM
- 623 Views
Also "as long as me" doesn't really factor, because I wasn't using myself to set the bar.
13/10/2010 11:26:29 PM
- 633 Views
Also, what qualifies as "good standing"? Who's the judge? *NM*
13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM
- 366 Views
Jonte is right. The judges are numerous. Each with their own motivations and interests. *NM*
13/10/2010 11:10:04 PM
- 297 Views
I'd fuck myself to death with a spike of frozen cat piss before I'd chat with that skype crowd.
13/10/2010 11:42:16 PM
- 630 Views
we are Rafonauts now.
13/10/2010 03:16:32 PM
- 466 Views
Yeah, I know, I came up with the term. Many still consider the "old gang" as "wotmaniacs" though.
13/10/2010 11:01:58 PM
- 648 Views
I sure hope you're right.
14/10/2010 05:04:26 AM
- 645 Views
There's a Chat if you want one.
10/10/2010 11:01:57 PM
- 626 Views
i wouldn't say mutely
10/10/2010 11:40:13 PM
- 586 Views
Well, like I said, talk about something else.
11/10/2010 01:32:15 AM
- 566 Views
do you know how hard it is stopping sports fanatics talking about sports?
11/10/2010 09:59:56 AM
- 613 Views