Honestly, I think the "one time event" is the biggest problem.
Joel Send a noteboard - 12/10/2010 04:20:04 AM
The issue is it would take about five or six respected, well-liked and entertaining rafonauts, with enough motivation to initiate the communication method and then appeal to their cohorts to join in. And do it regularly enough that it isn't a one-time event.
There have been spates of Skype activity periodically since wotmania went down and took it Chat with it, but it's like pulling teeth to get more than two or three people to try it at the same TIME. A few people come in for a couple days, see it's not this sprawling free for all with dozens of people, get bored and move on; a few weeks later a couple other people come in and do the same thing. It's like NASA sent out SETI probes, got bored when they didn't hear anything after a week, and everyone was off playing video games by the time ET phoned home.
Which is how I came to settle into just hanging out with the people who do visit regularly, or at least semi-regularly. It was never my goal to create a substitute for wotmania Chat, though Skype chats and conference calls generally my desire for that. In terms of architecture, I think it could fill that void for most people, but this conceit that there's some vast legion of unserviced chatters doesn't square with my observations, however limited my perspective. There are a couple dozen people who like some chat sometimes, depending on who's in there. That doesn't seem to really justify creating an entire new section of the site, when something's already filling that need without giving Ben any more to do (unless you count removing himself from a Skype convo when I create a new one and pull in every wotmaniac on my contact list. )
Just providing a place to have a Chat isn't going to bring back all the old wotmania Chat regulars though. If that's the problem, I suggest someone start sending emails, 'cos it ain't as easy as "if you build it he will come. " Trust me. Skype provides every electronic requirement. In fact, it has several things Chat lacked; boots stick and anyone who doesn't like it can just try and start another call/chat (of course, as was learned early on, that doesn't mean anyone will answer. ) People depend on who shows up at any given time, which is why I try to encourage as many people as possible to do so as often as possible. If all the things that made Chat desirable are absent though, giving them one more venue in which to be absent isn't going to make anything better, and doing it on RAFO WOULD make a lot more work for Ben.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Chat
10/10/2010 07:34:44 AM
- 981 Views
I've already had several days like that. Yet people keep insisting RAFO is better without chat. *NM*
10/10/2010 05:29:46 PM
- 347 Views
When chat used to be down for long stretches, everyone would just pile into AIM chat.
10/10/2010 06:54:33 PM
- 615 Views
Which they could easily do with Skype and get voice, yet no one does.
10/10/2010 10:56:55 PM
- 641 Views
The idea of voice chat creeps me out on so many levels *NM*
11/10/2010 12:34:22 AM
- 599 Views
Is that why the Edinburgh gathering pics are always nothing but sign language and dirty gestures? *NM*
11/10/2010 10:36:00 PM
- 335 Views
The group that is popularized as being a part of that is not enticing to long standing wotmaniacs. *NM*
11/10/2010 03:29:57 AM
- 358 Views
Then that, again, seems a problem that coding can't solve.
11/10/2010 07:33:32 AM
- 634 Views
I don't think most want to download another program when they had it so easy before.
11/10/2010 10:39:55 PM
- 655 Views
Honestly, I think the "one time event" is the biggest problem.
12/10/2010 04:20:04 AM
- 652 Views
I disagree. I don't think enough people think it worth the effort to deal with Skype.
12/10/2010 04:28:21 AM
- 563 Views
What effort?
12/10/2010 04:38:42 AM
- 540 Views
Re:
12/10/2010 11:00:56 PM
- 434 Views
Then where are they?
13/10/2010 04:00:46 AM
- 510 Views
You have a faulty memory. Chat was incredibly active as late as 2007.
13/10/2010 04:24:25 AM
- 570 Views
Again, that's people, and not/having Chat won't change that.
13/10/2010 04:45:40 AM
- 573 Views
Incorrect
13/10/2010 04:58:30 AM
- 585 Views
Initially only the person who started it can boot.
13/10/2010 05:12:27 AM
- 650 Views
Re: Initially only the person who started it can boot.
13/10/2010 02:45:50 PM
- 533 Views
Sounds right; don't really know much about The Tavern except that's all in character.
14/10/2010 04:54:06 AM
- 583 Views
What do you mean where are they? There isn't a chat linked to the site.
13/10/2010 10:44:10 PM
- 627 Views
So?
14/10/2010 04:52:37 AM
- 589 Views
I have to admit that I highly doubt I would ever participate if a revived chat were installed
13/10/2010 05:08:38 AM
- 571 Views
Most of the group consists of long-standing Wotmaniacs, so. *NM*
12/10/2010 05:25:39 AM
- 322 Views
I probably didn't phrase that right. Maybe an -er after long and an "in good" before standing.
12/10/2010 11:02:30 PM
- 605 Views
Plenty of people who've been around as long as you, and plenty in good standing. *NM*
13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM
- 306 Views
I see that my comments are being interpeted as a blanket insult to all parties involved...
13/10/2010 11:09:09 PM
- 623 Views
Also "as long as me" doesn't really factor, because I wasn't using myself to set the bar.
13/10/2010 11:26:29 PM
- 634 Views
Also, what qualifies as "good standing"? Who's the judge? *NM*
13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM
- 367 Views
Jonte is right. The judges are numerous. Each with their own motivations and interests. *NM*
13/10/2010 11:10:04 PM
- 298 Views
I'd fuck myself to death with a spike of frozen cat piss before I'd chat with that skype crowd.
13/10/2010 11:42:16 PM
- 631 Views
we are Rafonauts now.
13/10/2010 03:16:32 PM
- 466 Views
Yeah, I know, I came up with the term. Many still consider the "old gang" as "wotmaniacs" though.
13/10/2010 11:01:58 PM
- 648 Views
There's a Chat if you want one.
10/10/2010 11:01:57 PM
- 627 Views
i wouldn't say mutely
10/10/2010 11:40:13 PM
- 587 Views
Well, like I said, talk about something else.
11/10/2010 01:32:15 AM
- 567 Views
do you know how hard it is stopping sports fanatics talking about sports?
11/10/2010 09:59:56 AM
- 614 Views