Active Users:732 Time:13/12/2025 01:30:42 PM
Well, like I said, talk about something else. Joel Send a noteboard - 11/10/2010 01:32:15 AM
Would have totally gone there tonight if it existed. Oh well.

Several, in fact. With optional voice. I could have someone to argue with when I say, "Heh, Chefs suck" instead of Lucy and Stephen just staring at me mutely wondering what's up with the Yank.

i'm being vocally bored.

Not like I'm running both keyboards.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Chat - 10/10/2010 07:34:44 AM 1131 Views
Yes - 10/10/2010 11:10:18 AM 658 Views
Hey you - 10/10/2010 04:14:47 PM 731 Views
Hey Missa - 13/10/2010 04:35:46 AM 621 Views
I've already had several days like that. Yet people keep insisting RAFO is better without chat. *NM* - 10/10/2010 05:29:46 PM 396 Views
it depends which chat we get. - 10/10/2010 05:44:58 PM 696 Views
You're in the Skype Chat now, btw. - 10/10/2010 10:59:24 PM 632 Views
When chat used to be down for long stretches, everyone would just pile into AIM chat. - 10/10/2010 06:54:33 PM 771 Views
Which they could easily do with Skype and get voice, yet no one does. - 10/10/2010 10:56:55 PM 799 Views
The idea of voice chat creeps me out on so many levels *NM* - 11/10/2010 12:34:22 AM 741 Views
So don't do voice; we rarely do. - 11/10/2010 07:35:33 AM 736 Views
Same *NM* - 11/10/2010 09:40:29 AM 306 Views
Is that why the Edinburgh gathering pics are always nothing but sign language and dirty gestures? *NM* - 11/10/2010 10:36:00 PM 392 Views
Come and find out *NM* - 11/10/2010 10:48:56 PM 284 Views
The group that is popularized as being a part of that is not enticing to long standing wotmaniacs. *NM* - 11/10/2010 03:29:57 AM 411 Views
This. *NM* - 11/10/2010 04:43:52 AM 262 Views
Then that, again, seems a problem that coding can't solve. - 11/10/2010 07:33:32 AM 776 Views
I don't think most want to download another program when they had it so easy before. - 11/10/2010 10:39:55 PM 797 Views
Honestly, I think the "one time event" is the biggest problem. - 12/10/2010 04:20:04 AM 814 Views
I disagree. I don't think enough people think it worth the effort to deal with Skype. - 12/10/2010 04:28:21 AM 702 Views
What effort? - 12/10/2010 04:38:42 AM 691 Views
The effort beyond clicking two buttons. - 13/10/2010 04:25:57 AM 577 Views
Install, make a SN and search for people you email. - 13/10/2010 04:43:09 AM 740 Views
Re: - 12/10/2010 11:00:56 PM 573 Views
Then where are they? - 13/10/2010 04:00:46 AM 642 Views
You have a faulty memory. Chat was incredibly active as late as 2007. - 13/10/2010 04:24:25 AM 721 Views
Again, that's people, and not/having Chat won't change that. - 13/10/2010 04:45:40 AM 714 Views
Incorrect - 13/10/2010 04:58:30 AM 740 Views
Initially only the person who started it can boot. - 13/10/2010 05:12:27 AM 802 Views
Re: Initially only the person who started it can boot. - 13/10/2010 02:45:50 PM 662 Views
And me! - 13/10/2010 03:27:15 PM 662 Views
oops, sorry about that. *NM* - 13/10/2010 03:42:33 PM 616 Views
What do you mean where are they? There isn't a chat linked to the site. - 13/10/2010 10:44:10 PM 760 Views
So? - 14/10/2010 04:52:37 AM 742 Views
Are you deliberately trying to not understand? - 14/10/2010 05:54:16 AM 857 Views
Not deliberately. - 14/10/2010 06:21:09 AM 743 Views
I doubt that as well, frankly. *NM* - 13/10/2010 03:32:33 PM 318 Views
Things aren't what they used to be... - 13/10/2010 10:46:04 PM 670 Views
No - 13/10/2010 04:45:29 AM 645 Views
"Unmoderated" would be going too far. - 13/10/2010 04:53:19 AM 790 Views
Most of the group consists of long-standing Wotmaniacs, so. *NM* - 12/10/2010 05:25:39 AM 385 Views
I probably didn't phrase that right. Maybe an -er after long and an "in good" before standing. - 12/10/2010 11:02:30 PM 754 Views
Also, what qualifies as "good standing"? Who's the judge? *NM* - 13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM 421 Views
The one who wants to chat, of course? *NM* - 13/10/2010 07:23:15 AM 380 Views
Jonte is right. The judges are numerous. Each with their own motivations and interests. *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:10:04 PM 354 Views
I'd fuck myself to death with a spike of frozen cat piss before I'd chat with that skype crowd. - 13/10/2010 11:42:16 PM 759 Views
Colorful. You big, gay elitist. *NM* - 14/10/2010 12:06:14 AM 387 Views
See - 14/10/2010 05:42:21 AM 650 Views
we are Rafonauts now. - 13/10/2010 03:16:32 PM 606 Views
Yeah, I know, I came up with the term. Many still consider the "old gang" as "wotmaniacs" though. - 13/10/2010 11:01:58 PM 785 Views
I sure hope you're right. - 14/10/2010 05:04:26 AM 828 Views
I am RAFOlk. - 14/10/2010 06:22:25 AM 637 Views
When I got facebook I stopped logging in to aim. - 11/10/2010 01:24:26 AM 653 Views
There's a Chat if you want one. - 10/10/2010 11:01:57 PM 765 Views
i wouldn't say mutely - 10/10/2010 11:40:13 PM 736 Views
Ditto. - 10/10/2010 11:53:32 PM 677 Views
Well, like I said, talk about something else. - 11/10/2010 01:32:15 AM 692 Views
do you know how hard it is stopping sports fanatics talking about sports? - 11/10/2010 09:59:56 AM 775 Views
I'll usually shut up if someone carries another topic. - 12/10/2010 04:25:19 AM 712 Views
I'd deign to chat with you, m'friend. *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:43:13 PM 342 Views
- 14/10/2010 05:45:26 AM 679 Views
Re: - 14/10/2010 05:47:07 AM 705 Views
While I'm passing through, "Hi wooly and Kit. Long time." *NM* - 14/10/2010 10:14:49 PM 389 Views

Reply to Message