A LOT of people (including me) are angry that the redirect isn't more prominent, especially right now. RAFO is pretty much the primary heir of wotmania since Mike and Pento aren't doing it, Larry still posts here in addition to BotF, and there's still plenty of WoT content even without the TP and the FAQ, so it seems like we should be the primary alternate. Of course, not being privy to the decision making there I can't comment on the rationale. That, too, makes people more inclined to cry foul when an accident happens, if no more justified.
The OF Blog (its official name now, I should note) is my main priority, along with several projects that will come to light shortly that will draw more attention than this entire site typically does from outside; I view this as a place to be silly in ways I choose not to on the blog and little else. But for what it's worth, the Blog and The Thirteenth Depository are the only active sites that actually preserve wotmania content right now; RAFO might in the future, but not at the present.
We will. It is just a matter of the code being written. Everyone has full time jobs, after all. Coding takes time (especially since Wotmania's coding was apparently ... erratic? and translation it to this format therefore becomes a hassle). I have a lot of stuff stored on my computer and a backup disk; I know Tor has a lot more. It'll show.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
>: [ So apparently none of us were good enough for wotmania....
09/10/2010 08:33:46 PM
- 2102 Views
I want to know more about this!
09/10/2010 08:36:02 PM
- 1147 Views
I know! I don't understand why they're using the wotmania domain name for this...
09/10/2010 09:45:26 PM
- 1192 Views
I guess Jason offered a lot of money then? *NM*
09/10/2010 08:41:09 PM
- 623 Views
We were told it was about the "trust" that the wotmania members had put in Mike by signing up. *NM*
09/10/2010 08:46:11 PM
- 463 Views
Indeed. Imagine this has quashed any vestiges of good feeling towards the man. *NM*
09/10/2010 08:47:12 PM
- 655 Views
Yeah, I wasn't overly angry with Mike before, but that's changed *NM*
09/10/2010 08:58:51 PM
- 617 Views
Someone had already pointed this out in the other thread from a while back. It's bullshit.
09/10/2010 08:48:27 PM
- 1073 Views
Huh. I completely missed that.
09/10/2010 08:49:52 PM
- 1250 Views
I bet you say that a lot, Beks. *NM*
09/10/2010 09:01:22 PM
- 661 Views
nonsense. I will indulge in my internet RIGHT to nerdrage!!! *NM*
09/10/2010 08:50:46 PM
- 631 Views
Oh, I'm not saying don't be mad over it and don't talk about it.
09/10/2010 08:58:47 PM
- 1212 Views
I don't know; pretty sure a redirect page isn't terribly rough on the servers. *NM*
09/10/2010 09:13:58 PM
- 544 Views
Of course it isn't, but he didn't have to do it.
09/10/2010 09:21:14 PM
- 1113 Views
The dragonmount wotmania landing page with the redirect is still accesible if you google wotmania *NM*
09/10/2010 09:37:16 PM
- 3571 Views
Truthfully (and I'm sure I've expressed some of this before at one point or another)...
11/10/2010 10:40:44 PM
- 977 Views
That's a little bit bum!
09/10/2010 09:01:21 PM
- 973 Views
For what it's worth, after A Memory of Light comes out Dragonmount will go down like a rock.
09/10/2010 09:44:27 PM
- 1198 Views
good point, but that doesn't make me feel better about Mike being an ass *NM*
09/10/2010 09:46:18 PM
- 535 Views
Oddly it makes me feel better. He has a point. "Read and Find Out" is a timeless name.
10/10/2010 12:14:29 AM
- 994 Views
Right, like Planet Tolkien did after the Silmarillion.
10/10/2010 02:28:01 AM
- 1105 Views
I essentially totally disagree with everything you said and its underlying premises. *NM*
10/10/2010 05:36:01 AM
- 604 Views
I just messaged dragonmount on twitter!
10/10/2010 12:02:56 AM
- 1002 Views
Why would he name his movie site wotmania? *NM*
10/10/2010 12:12:09 AM
- 593 Views
He might have picked it as it has some recognition in the area he is making films
10/10/2010 12:25:52 AM
- 1011 Views
He didn't, it just redirects there. And judging by the Twitter comment that wasn't on purpose. *NM*
10/10/2010 12:57:04 AM
- 636 Views
I'm not angry at anyone. Wotmania died aug 2009.
10/10/2010 02:04:57 AM
- 959 Views
It doesn't matter *why* it was wrong, it just was
10/10/2010 02:54:07 AM
- 1027 Views
Point taken. And I am sorry for the loss of Wotmania, the way it used to be.
10/10/2010 08:15:59 AM
- 1030 Views
*throws chocolate fudge at you*
10/10/2010 11:34:42 AM
- 994 Views
*returns fire w/ Marshmallow shooter!!*
10/10/2010 01:32:10 PM
- 1095 Views
Re: >: [ So apparently none of us were good enough for wotmania....
10/10/2010 05:33:00 AM
- 1190 Views
Too much bitterness yet.
10/10/2010 06:11:42 AM
- 1063 Views
Well...
10/10/2010 06:47:49 AM
- 1168 Views
I guess maybe that's fair.
10/10/2010 06:55:07 AM
- 1077 Views
Insularity has been a problem for years now
10/10/2010 07:23:10 AM
- 1060 Views
Re: Insularity has been a problem for years now
10/10/2010 05:44:27 PM
- 1082 Views
I don't think most are well-versed, unfortunately
10/10/2010 06:52:49 PM
- 867 Views
Dear Jason:
10/10/2010 08:44:47 AM
- 1024 Views
This.
10/10/2010 11:27:36 AM
- 1435 Views
I don't agree.
10/10/2010 11:40:25 AM
- 1123 Views
Re: I don't agree.
10/10/2010 11:44:05 AM
- 1134 Views
There is email... Or the Dragonmount forums...
10/10/2010 11:53:42 AM
- 954 Views
Agreed.
16/10/2010 01:21:50 PM
- 1095 Views
I agree.
10/10/2010 01:52:27 PM
- 905 Views
And now Jason is free to make his own choices with the domain... *NM*
12/10/2010 11:30:54 AM
- 584 Views
Yes.
13/10/2010 12:14:07 AM
- 1094 Views
Hi
10/10/2010 11:38:13 AM
- 1201 Views
Re: Hi
10/10/2010 01:29:48 PM
- 1261 Views
Unless someone is willing to buy the domain or he's willing to sell it, it's his.
10/10/2010 03:35:23 PM
- 950 Views
Stupid browser cache!
11/10/2010 03:01:09 PM
- 1175 Views
Frankly, I agree, but having heard the arguments the other way, I can see that side.
16/10/2010 02:08:08 PM
- 1316 Views
Classy response, Jason. Thank you for taking the time to let us know what was happening.
10/10/2010 06:46:32 PM
- 983 Views