Active Users:840 Time:23/12/2024 02:15:14 AM
Shedding a little light on the "Law" in question. Tashmere Send a noteboard - 01/10/2010 12:40:00 AM
I will comment more later. Right now I have to go do something.
fact check.
Reply to message
Scuzziest politcal ad of the season... so far - 29/09/2010 08:06:19 PM 1061 Views
You think that's worse than Renee Elmer's one in North Carolina? - 29/09/2010 08:38:30 PM 1053 Views
you may not like her position but it isn't a blatant lie - 29/09/2010 08:47:44 PM 708 Views
Yes, much - 29/09/2010 08:55:38 PM 711 Views
The ad didn't make me cringe, but the interview afterward certainly did - 29/09/2010 09:07:06 PM 687 Views
Yeah... oh dear, this is painful. - 29/09/2010 09:37:26 PM 675 Views
I'm with the other people responding. - 29/09/2010 09:18:50 PM 730 Views
The bad news he will lose in November - 29/09/2010 08:42:22 PM 661 Views
His name is Daniel Webster. That is awesome *NM* - 29/09/2010 09:02:15 PM 335 Views
To be fair... - 29/09/2010 11:59:33 PM 770 Views
What little I found in the time I had... - 30/09/2010 04:02:51 AM 794 Views
Why should a woman get alimony for cheating on her husband? - 30/09/2010 05:23:03 AM 686 Views
Because the law in question only eliminated it for women. - 30/09/2010 05:27:12 AM 944 Views
What law? - 30/09/2010 07:49:59 PM 772 Views
Shedding a little light on the "Law" in question. - 01/10/2010 12:40:00 AM 811 Views
You can argue almost any position but that doesn’t make it right - 30/09/2010 08:17:03 PM 794 Views
Poor life choices? - 30/09/2010 09:46:14 PM 762 Views
I did say in rare case they deserve limited alimony - 30/09/2010 10:47:39 PM 779 Views
I'm not saying that alimony should be very high, of course. - 30/09/2010 11:27:08 PM 690 Views
This is why I hate politics. *NM* - 30/09/2010 12:11:08 AM 326 Views
Pathetic. *NM* - 30/09/2010 12:25:52 AM 335 Views
I like how he disabled comments for the video. Pussy. *NM* - 30/09/2010 06:40:57 AM 335 Views

Reply to Message