The only reason I could see to fire him would be based on a couple of grounds...
The fact that his public actions have demonstrated his lack of judgment. He is a prosecuting attorney, so any case he works on will be under extra scrutiny and could be up for appeal. If he works on a case that convicts someone, they could appeal it based on his demonstrated poor judgment and obvious bias that leads him to extreme actions. Imagine if he worked on a case that was to convict a gay person of some crime. His actions open the office, and the state, up to more expense and a greater burden, and even if he is assigned to cases where his expressed bias won't have an affect, that means he is permanently limiting the work he can do.
But, if they fire him for any other reason, then it would be wrong. Very wrong.
The fact that his public actions have demonstrated his lack of judgment. He is a prosecuting attorney, so any case he works on will be under extra scrutiny and could be up for appeal. If he works on a case that convicts someone, they could appeal it based on his demonstrated poor judgment and obvious bias that leads him to extreme actions. Imagine if he worked on a case that was to convict a gay person of some crime. His actions open the office, and the state, up to more expense and a greater burden, and even if he is assigned to cases where his expressed bias won't have an affect, that means he is permanently limiting the work he can do.
But, if they fire him for any other reason, then it would be wrong. Very wrong.
I was Phelix on wotmania, I will always be Phelix in the "real" world, and now I am Phelix on RAFO.
You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill
*MySmiley*
You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill
*MySmiley*
Michigan attorney general defends employee's right to blog
30/09/2010 02:20:41 PM
- 810 Views
he has a right to blog, but that's slander.
30/09/2010 05:14:09 PM
- 578 Views
I don't see why he shouldn't be able to keep his job
30/09/2010 07:20:16 PM
- 551 Views
For the most part, I agree...
30/09/2010 10:41:44 PM
- 691 Views
yah...if he was working another profession that'd be one thing...
01/10/2010 01:54:45 AM
- 552 Views
If the guy did something criminal, he should be terminated; if not, not.
30/09/2010 09:54:51 PM
- 529 Views
well, when you start getting into the nitty gritty, it's really not legal.
01/10/2010 01:56:44 AM
- 516 Views
I do tend to think people should be free to do what they like out of work
30/09/2010 11:19:35 PM
- 540 Views