Because the law in question only eliminated it for women.
Phelix Send a noteboard - 30/09/2010 05:27:12 AM
They need to do away with it all together except in extreme cases. It is 2010, women can support themselves even it may not be in the style they had grown accustomed to. In most the case I have seen the guy sure isn't living the same life style he was before the divorce. Family courts should not be used for extortion.
If the law was even handed and eliminated alimony all together, or in all cases of infidelity, sure that would be fine, but it didn't do that. It specifically called out women.
That said, if you're divorcing and suing for half of your joint possessions, you could make a strong argument that the years of support you gave your spouse entitles you to a portion of their income until you marry again because without you and your support they would not have been able to achieve as much, especially if you became a stay-at-home spouse or parent to allow them to work.
I was Phelix on wotmania, I will always be Phelix in the "real" world, and now I am Phelix on RAFO.
You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill
*MySmiley*
You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill
*MySmiley*
Scuzziest politcal ad of the season... so far
29/09/2010 08:06:19 PM
- 1061 Views
Wow...that reminds me of Homer Simpson looking for that "sweet, sweet can".
29/09/2010 08:31:35 PM
- 727 Views
You think that's worse than Renee Elmer's one in North Carolina?
29/09/2010 08:38:30 PM
- 1052 Views
The ad didn't make me cringe, but the interview afterward certainly did
29/09/2010 09:07:06 PM
- 686 Views
I despise them both. In their own way they are both disgusting, manipulative, ignorant tools.
30/09/2010 03:46:36 AM
- 608 Views
To be fair...
29/09/2010 11:59:33 PM
- 769 Views
Why should a woman get alimony for cheating on her husband?
30/09/2010 05:23:03 AM
- 686 Views
Because the law in question only eliminated it for women.
30/09/2010 05:27:12 AM
- 944 Views
You can argue almost any position but that doesn’t make it right
30/09/2010 08:17:03 PM
- 793 Views
Poor life choices?
30/09/2010 09:46:14 PM
- 761 Views