I'm aware people are held accountable at their jobs. I was mocking the people who would say that your employers shouldn't be forbidden to use your facebook page against you, instead of simply behaving better or keeping their facebook private.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 13/09/2010 at 11:12:01 PM
HR looks at facebook.
13/09/2010 07:07:35 PM
- 964 Views
my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
13/09/2010 07:53:03 PM
- 701 Views
Re: my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
13/09/2010 10:17:41 PM
- 613 Views
Was it supposed to be a HIPAA violation or something?
14/09/2010 10:41:44 PM
- 600 Views
I would say it was because she was letting unauthorized people handle babies under intensive care.
14/09/2010 10:55:45 PM
- 549 Views
I wish they would've fired my coworker.
14/09/2010 10:54:48 PM
- 533 Views
Public is public is public.
13/09/2010 08:28:19 PM
- 557 Views
no one should have to be accountable for their stupidity!!!
13/09/2010 09:07:01 PM
- 605 Views
You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
- 527 Views
*turns on your sarcasm detection*
13/09/2010 11:10:29 PM
- 536 Views
Who? *NM*
13/09/2010 08:53:00 PM
- 288 Views
Human resources. *NM*
13/09/2010 09:04:14 PM
- 259 Views
Thanks. Why not write that, April? *NM*
13/09/2010 10:34:02 PM
- 301 Views
Because HR is a very widely used abbreviation in the English-speaking world. *NM*
13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
- 298 Views
It's really a word in itself by now. *NM*
13/09/2010 11:29:04 PM
- 253 Views
Hmpf *NM*
14/09/2010 08:15:33 AM
- 306 Views
What does that stand for? Something with ridiculously too many letters and in German, no doubt. *NM*
15/09/2010 12:43:40 AM
- 266 Views
Hot Redheads. *NM*
13/09/2010 10:23:12 PM
- 270 Views
Eh, no biggie.
14/09/2010 02:16:37 AM
- 506 Views
Where it might be justified would be if the employee had just called into work
14/09/2010 02:55:00 AM
- 532 Views
That's the stupidity clause.
14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
- 503 Views
maybe it should or it shouldn't...but it does
14/09/2010 04:26:50 AM
- 542 Views
lol, I guess we have different ideas of "simply living."
14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
- 463 Views
I'd say in that specific case...
14/09/2010 06:11:48 AM
- 523 Views
Huh, it's all the rage here
14/09/2010 02:01:11 PM
- 594 Views
I don't think HR should be looking at what people do outside of work, it seems unethical
14/09/2010 10:42:37 AM
- 483 Views
They shouldn't, but I would expect them to.
14/09/2010 02:08:07 PM
- 542 Views
I agree.
14/09/2010 10:46:12 PM
- 503 Views