By definition, that's the information you want to make public to the world, and is every bit the same as posting pictures of your vacation on your office door. I think employers have every right to content you make publicly available, and have no problem at all with the idea. Of course, I've heard of employers who require that employees friend them or whatever, and I vehemently disagree with that.
HR looks at facebook.
13/09/2010 07:07:35 PM
- 963 Views
Your public profile is exactly that.
13/09/2010 07:34:17 PM
- 622 Views
my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
13/09/2010 07:53:03 PM
- 701 Views
Re: my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
13/09/2010 10:17:41 PM
- 613 Views
Was it supposed to be a HIPAA violation or something?
14/09/2010 10:41:44 PM
- 600 Views
I would say it was because she was letting unauthorized people handle babies under intensive care.
14/09/2010 10:55:45 PM
- 549 Views
I wish they would've fired my coworker.
14/09/2010 10:54:48 PM
- 533 Views
Public is public is public.
13/09/2010 08:28:19 PM
- 557 Views
no one should have to be accountable for their stupidity!!!
13/09/2010 09:07:01 PM
- 605 Views
You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
- 526 Views
Who? *NM*
13/09/2010 08:53:00 PM
- 288 Views
Human resources. *NM*
13/09/2010 09:04:14 PM
- 258 Views
Thanks. Why not write that, April? *NM*
13/09/2010 10:34:02 PM
- 301 Views
Because HR is a very widely used abbreviation in the English-speaking world. *NM*
13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
- 298 Views
It's really a word in itself by now. *NM*
13/09/2010 11:29:04 PM
- 253 Views
Hmpf *NM*
14/09/2010 08:15:33 AM
- 305 Views
What does that stand for? Something with ridiculously too many letters and in German, no doubt. *NM*
15/09/2010 12:43:40 AM
- 266 Views
Hot Redheads. *NM*
13/09/2010 10:23:12 PM
- 269 Views
Eh, no biggie.
14/09/2010 02:16:37 AM
- 506 Views
Where it might be justified would be if the employee had just called into work
14/09/2010 02:55:00 AM
- 532 Views
That's the stupidity clause.
14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
- 503 Views
maybe it should or it shouldn't...but it does
14/09/2010 04:26:50 AM
- 542 Views
lol, I guess we have different ideas of "simply living."
14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
- 463 Views
I'd say in that specific case...
14/09/2010 06:11:48 AM
- 521 Views
Huh, it's all the rage here
14/09/2010 02:01:11 PM
- 593 Views
I don't think HR should be looking at what people do outside of work, it seems unethical
14/09/2010 10:42:37 AM
- 483 Views
They shouldn't, but I would expect them to.
14/09/2010 02:08:07 PM
- 541 Views
I agree.
14/09/2010 10:46:12 PM
- 502 Views