Active Users:934 Time:16/09/2025 02:49:53 AM
That's the crux of it. Joel Send a noteboard - 07/09/2010 11:24:44 AM
but in this case they really couldn't afford to ignore them. I don't like how religion is stacked against homosexuality, but that's not really the discussion here.

The woman committed what is, in the eyes of the Catholic Church, a grave sin, publicly, and against her employment contract. I really don't think they COULD have ignored it.

As you note, no idea how consistent and comprehensive they are about it, but this is why we need to distinguish marriage as a legal institution from marriage as a Christian sacrament: However one feels about the Churchs views of an issue, they can't just disregard those views and still claim to be the Church. Which is one of many reasons we have the First Amendment: So that religious institutions aren't forced to condone practices they officially condemn, and so THAT right doesn't preclude the right of others to engage in those practices regardless of what the Church or anyone thinks.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Gay Marriage and Religious Institutions - 04/09/2010 11:36:14 PM 1510 Views
Religion 100% aside, it's"okay" because she breached her contract - 05/09/2010 12:18:36 AM 1086 Views
Well, my tripes with it are a little in line with that - 05/09/2010 01:26:56 AM 1110 Views
Re: Well, my tripes with it are a little in line with that - 05/09/2010 01:41:34 AM 1062 Views
goodness knows that the military sign their rights away ALL THE TIME - 05/09/2010 02:44:58 AM 909 Views
While I understand that view - 05/09/2010 04:05:29 AM 1024 Views
There is a difference in the degree of the transgressions and the public nature of them as well. - 05/09/2010 02:30:06 AM 999 Views
agreed. There may be some hypocrisy in the church employment practices... - 05/09/2010 02:49:44 AM 970 Views
That's the crux of it. - 07/09/2010 11:24:44 AM 1112 Views
Re: There is a difference in the degree of the transgressions and the public nature of them as well. - 09/09/2010 06:43:23 AM 1289 Views
I could not believe this post was serious. - 10/09/2010 02:04:10 AM 1095 Views
Good god... - 10/09/2010 10:52:03 AM 1078 Views
To recieve federal funds you can't discriminate - 05/09/2010 04:02:13 AM 1107 Views
She chose to work for a Catholic institution. - 05/09/2010 05:54:23 PM 909 Views
what a stupid thing to say - 05/09/2010 07:38:16 PM 1045 Views
Um... no? One can be excommunicated for any number of things. *NM* - 05/09/2010 08:22:29 PM 370 Views
yeah back in the time when there was no electricity *NM* - 05/09/2010 08:25:17 PM 411 Views
...um, no. I'm not sure where you're getting that from, but it's completely wrong. - 06/09/2010 01:06:49 AM 956 Views
You can't be excommunicated for being gay - 06/09/2010 02:51:21 AM 1035 Views
No one here said you could. - 06/09/2010 03:00:07 AM 980 Views
I am not disagreeing with that, excommunications do happen - 06/09/2010 03:07:57 AM 1054 Views
Wow! What an underwhelming argument. - 06/09/2010 04:24:32 AM 1013 Views
Actually, the Pope has the right to say "sorry, you're not a Catholic anymore". - 05/09/2010 08:43:34 PM 1170 Views
See above post - 06/09/2010 02:52:25 AM 901 Views
What? - 06/09/2010 02:56:59 AM 902 Views
Nope - 06/09/2010 03:03:48 AM 950 Views
Inaction, like, for example, not saving lives where you could have is also grounds for expulsion. - 06/09/2010 06:35:31 PM 814 Views
Hmm, but I think that's a different type of inaction than the kind he's discussing - 06/09/2010 08:02:50 PM 1126 Views
I never infered that that was the case. - 06/09/2010 08:24:30 PM 831 Views
mmm, but your example isn't inaction ALONE - 06/09/2010 08:46:56 PM 933 Views
Hmm interesting question. - 06/09/2010 10:35:19 PM 1019 Views
is excommunication about "use" though? - 06/09/2010 10:36:55 PM 1051 Views
I don't know. - 07/09/2010 05:47:42 AM 895 Views
yah, I'd agree with that - 07/09/2010 11:59:01 AM 1051 Views
Well thank god you aren't the pope - 07/09/2010 03:29:00 AM 1012 Views
I would say the same for you. - 07/09/2010 05:50:55 AM 959 Views
Dismas is a Saint? - 07/09/2010 12:08:45 PM 1048 Views
It's pretty hard to argue with that one. *NM* - 08/09/2010 04:18:41 AM 355 Views
Yeah, was just surprised they'd made it official is all. - 08/09/2010 04:36:28 AM 999 Views
You are purposefully trying to split hairs - 07/09/2010 03:15:08 AM 938 Views
Calling me an idiot... - 07/09/2010 05:52:39 AM 943 Views
My turn to split hairs: - 07/09/2010 12:10:33 PM 948 Views
does excommunication mean you are no longer Catholic? - 06/09/2010 08:52:58 PM 835 Views
i'm pretty sure we have this conversation on a weekly basis. *NM* - 06/09/2010 09:05:33 PM 393 Views
Yeah. - 06/09/2010 10:34:10 PM 821 Views
is being Catholic a belief system or a club? - 06/09/2010 11:03:00 PM 922 Views
Depends on who you ask - 07/09/2010 03:12:23 AM 1074 Views
It's both. - 07/09/2010 05:54:13 AM 1029 Views
I'm unsure about that. It doesn't invalidate baptism. - 07/09/2010 08:23:33 AM 899 Views
I thought conformation is what made you a member of the church *NM* - 07/09/2010 06:42:36 PM 360 Views
You're correct. - 08/09/2010 02:33:45 AM 943 Views
Hey I haven't brought up the last two times - 07/09/2010 03:30:18 AM 928 Views
My god people that cheat or divorce shouldn't be Catholic - 06/09/2010 02:26:23 AM 836 Views
I'm inclined to agree. - 07/09/2010 11:31:59 AM 895 Views
Re: I'm inclined to agree. - 10/09/2010 02:36:05 AM 1021 Views

Reply to Message