Active Users:482 Time:25/02/2025 04:36:39 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* random thoughts Send a noteboard - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM
anyone with GPS on their mobile can be tracked as long as they don't remove the SIM card and they are carrying it, obviously. Or with GPS in their car. Or boat. The chips the government agent sticks under your bumper just work better.
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1455 Views
what a stupid decision... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 856 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1014 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 888 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 840 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 885 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 860 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 945 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 822 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho moondog - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 959 Views
and how is it different from police hiding a GPS tracker in my coat? Or is that OK too? *NM* Aeryn - 26/08/2010 05:12:30 AM 414 Views
It does seem wrong snoopcester - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 888 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1030 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 916 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 819 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 916 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 929 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 408 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 397 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 869 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 919 Views
but effective random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 794 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 924 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer random thoughts - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 783 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 905 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 919 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. LadyLorraine - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 834 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1071 Views
all the more reason to listen to a police officer if they point a taser at you *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:43:46 PM 387 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* Floffe - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 423 Views
It was Franklin. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 925 Views
i do love that quote LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 816 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 767 Views
it's a lovely musical LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 746 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Macharius - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 830 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 969 Views
The law is not always just or correct. Legislators make mistakes and can be corrupt. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly - 25/08/2010 09:06:55 PM 399 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 980 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 918 Views
I don't think that's true. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 833 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign random thoughts - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 910 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 926 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized Ryan - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 988 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1028 Views
I think... Hezzah - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 891 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. Gher - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 777 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 818 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* Dan - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 396 Views
ummmm.... damookster - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 867 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 339 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though Floffe - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 803 Views
I have 3 words for you... Bramhodoulos - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1088 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* random thoughts - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 396 Views
right damookster - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 905 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. Joel - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 865 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes