It is cheaper so it might become more common but from a privacy point of it really isn't that much different. I think the gated property thing is a bit over rated as well since all they would need to do follow you until you stop at a public place and attach it there. Yes people with privacy fences have a greater expectation of privacy behind the fence then people do not have on just like people who park in their garage would have a greater expectation of privacy then people who don’t. Arguing that people can not expect privacy behind a privacy fence because everyone does not have one is like arguing that people should not expect privacy in their home because there are homeless people.
Part of the problem is people see this as being simply a case for the courts. If you oppose then get laws passed to make it illegal.
Part of the problem is people see this as being simply a case for the courts. If you oppose then get laws passed to make it illegal.
you have a right to privacy *IN YOUR CAR* but you don't have the right to expect that your car is private property? on 4th amendment grounds, this sounds like a classic illegal search. and on 5th amendment grounds, it seems like there's a lot of self-incrimination going on, not to mention private property being used for public surveillance. this is a terrible, awful, horrible decision by the court. hopefully the supreme court strikes it down.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
1984 at last...Very Disturbing
25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM
- 1430 Views
what a stupid decision...
25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM
- 833 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway
25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM
- 858 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures.
25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM
- 813 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter?
25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM
- 920 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho
26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM
- 933 Views
and how is it different from police hiding a GPS tracker in my coat? Or is that OK too? *NM*
26/08/2010 05:12:30 AM
- 401 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing
25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM
- 886 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law?
25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM
- 791 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer
25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM
- 886 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent?
25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM
- 900 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM*
25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM
- 398 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM*
25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM
- 387 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting
25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM
- 845 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean.
25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM
- 890 Views
but effective
25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM
- 767 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE
25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM
- 895 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer
25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM
- 753 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though.
25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM
- 883 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered
26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM
- 889 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon..
26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM
- 809 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted?
26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM
- 1027 Views
all the more reason to listen to a police officer if they point a taser at you *NM*
26/08/2010 02:43:46 PM
- 376 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM*
25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM
- 415 Views
It was Franklin.
25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM
- 895 Views
i do love that quote
25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM
- 788 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed.
25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM
- 739 Views
The law is not always just or correct. Legislators make mistakes and can be corrupt. *NM*
25/08/2010 09:06:55 PM
- 388 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me.
25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM
- 957 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property
25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM
- 887 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign
25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM
- 886 Views
I think...
25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM
- 859 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house.
25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM
- 746 Views