A police officer does not have to be endanger to use a taser. He or she can use a taser to keep from being put in a dangerous situation. That means if you are ordered by a police officer to comply and refuse he has the choice between fighting you and tasing you. Fighting you can be dangerous so you get tased. Your choice. He doesn't have to just stand there and keep telling you over and over.
Now there are a few cases we it looks like someone was tased when they shouldn't have been but it isn't different then when they would use a nightstick when they didn't need to. Most of the case I see people getting upset over the person who got tasered was at fault.
Now there are a few cases we it looks like someone was tased when they shouldn't have been but it isn't different then when they would use a nightstick when they didn't need to. Most of the case I see people getting upset over the person who got tasered was at fault.
1984 at last...Very Disturbing
25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM
- 1482 Views
what a stupid decision...
25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM
- 883 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway
25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM
- 912 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures.
25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM
- 866 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter?
25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM
- 967 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho
26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM
- 986 Views
and how is it different from police hiding a GPS tracker in my coat? Or is that OK too? *NM*
26/08/2010 05:12:30 AM
- 426 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing
25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM
- 941 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law?
25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM
- 844 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer
25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM
- 941 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent?
25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM
- 954 Views

most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM*
25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM
- 419 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM*
25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM
- 409 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting
25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM
- 893 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean.
25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM
- 944 Views
but effective
25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM
- 821 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE
25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM
- 953 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer
25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM
- 808 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though.
25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM
- 930 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered
26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM
- 946 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon..
26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM
- 859 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted?
26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM
- 1104 Views
all the more reason to listen to a police officer if they point a taser at you *NM*
26/08/2010 02:43:46 PM
- 400 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM*
25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM
- 435 Views
It was Franklin.
25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM
- 952 Views

i do love that quote
25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM
- 838 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed.
25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM
- 791 Views
The law is not always just or correct. Legislators make mistakes and can be corrupt. *NM*
25/08/2010 09:06:55 PM
- 408 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me.
25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM
- 1003 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property
25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM
- 942 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign
25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM
- 933 Views
I think...
25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM
- 913 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house.
25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM
- 803 Views