if you just tell a student "to create a possessive, add 's" it's much more simple.
In which case you add just a "'"
I'm just guessing on why it changed but the usual reason for thigns like this from what I've seen are that teachers try to keep rules simple.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Grammar Nazis should really enjoy this!
- 25/08/2010 06:55:22 PM
811 Views
Re: Grammar Nazis should really enjoy this!
- 25/08/2010 07:44:41 PM
656 Views
I'd like it more if it wasn't archaic. 
- 25/08/2010 07:57:28 PM
517 Views
- 25/08/2010 07:57:28 PM
517 Views
Isn't that covered with the "then do this" suggestion?
- 25/08/2010 08:17:38 PM
494 Views
The 90's one?
- 25/08/2010 09:00:48 PM
431 Views
I just didn't know if you meant the one in 90's (see commentary) or the one in '90s.
- 25/08/2010 09:08:27 PM
510 Views
You're right. Reading that again, I did find it confusing.
- 25/08/2010 09:14:36 PM
492 Views
Wait a minute, "s's" is acceptable? Charles's really?
- 25/08/2010 08:24:20 PM
495 Views
... of course? *NM*
- 25/08/2010 08:55:00 PM
195 Views
Yes.
- 25/08/2010 09:03:09 PM
518 Views
It seems...wrong to me. Tacky. I will slap anyone that uses it 
*NM*
- 25/08/2010 09:05:31 PM
224 Views
*NM*
- 25/08/2010 09:05:31 PM
224 Views
it's acceptable
- 25/08/2010 09:09:02 PM
505 Views
Re: it's acceptable
- 25/08/2010 09:18:50 PM
494 Views
? but teaching NO s's is an extra detail
- 25/08/2010 09:23:12 PM
475 Views
Except when it is a plural
- 25/08/2010 09:35:46 PM
458 Views