It seems...wrong to me. Tacky. I will slap anyone that uses it 
*NM*
Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 09:05:31 PM
*NM*
Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 09:05:31 PM
It's the older version, but equally valid.
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Grammar Nazis should really enjoy this!
- 25/08/2010 06:55:22 PM
734 Views
Re: Grammar Nazis should really enjoy this!
- 25/08/2010 07:44:41 PM
573 Views
I'd like it more if it wasn't archaic. 
- 25/08/2010 07:57:28 PM
437 Views
- 25/08/2010 07:57:28 PM
437 Views
Isn't that covered with the "then do this" suggestion?
- 25/08/2010 08:17:38 PM
425 Views
The 90's one?
- 25/08/2010 09:00:48 PM
368 Views
I just didn't know if you meant the one in 90's (see commentary) or the one in '90s.
- 25/08/2010 09:08:27 PM
427 Views
You're right. Reading that again, I did find it confusing.
- 25/08/2010 09:14:36 PM
427 Views
Wait a minute, "s's" is acceptable? Charles's really?
- 25/08/2010 08:24:20 PM
415 Views
... of course? *NM*
- 25/08/2010 08:55:00 PM
172 Views
Yes.
- 25/08/2010 09:03:09 PM
443 Views
It seems...wrong to me. Tacky. I will slap anyone that uses it *NM*
- 25/08/2010 09:05:31 PM
196 Views
*NM*
- 25/08/2010 09:05:31 PM
196 Views
it's acceptable
- 25/08/2010 09:09:02 PM
432 Views
Re: it's acceptable
- 25/08/2010 09:18:50 PM
429 Views