Active Users:818 Time:24/12/2024 12:17:21 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM
However, you wouldn't expect that individual to walk up and start messing with your lawn.

I believe a "no solicitors" sign works as well? After all, most non-guests are soliciting :P
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1406 Views
what a stupid decision... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 817 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 972 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 829 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 793 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 839 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 812 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 892 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 772 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho moondog - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 914 Views
and how is it different from police hiding a GPS tracker in my coat? Or is that OK too? *NM* Aeryn - 26/08/2010 05:12:30 AM 392 Views
It does seem wrong snoopcester - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 842 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 981 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 852 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 767 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 860 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 877 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 388 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 378 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 826 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 866 Views
but effective random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 743 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 876 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer random thoughts - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 729 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 865 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 867 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. LadyLorraine - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 781 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1009 Views
all the more reason to listen to a police officer if they point a taser at you *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:43:46 PM 369 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* Floffe - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 406 Views
It was Franklin. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 876 Views
i do love that quote LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 765 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 715 Views
it's a lovely musical LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 698 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Macharius - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 784 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 915 Views
The law is not always just or correct. Legislators make mistakes and can be corrupt. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly - 25/08/2010 09:06:55 PM 378 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 935 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 861 Views
I don't think that's true. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 784 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign random thoughts - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 868 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 881 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized Ryan - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 941 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 972 Views
I think... Hezzah - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 834 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. Gher - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 723 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 765 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* Dan - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 374 Views
ummmm.... damookster - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 818 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 320 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though Floffe - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 756 Views
I have 3 words for you... Bramhodoulos - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1037 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* random thoughts - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 375 Views
right damookster - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 849 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. Joel - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 817 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes