Active Users:436 Time:28/04/2025 06:54:26 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Should a person without a garage be penalized Ryan Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM
For parking their car in the driveway? What about parking lots for apartment complexes? You should be able to park your vehicle without it being tampered with.

Where is the line?
The past is just that, the past. You can only truly live by looking to the future!
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1482 Views
what a stupid decision... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 883 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1038 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 912 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 866 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 907 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 884 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 967 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 846 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho moondog - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 986 Views
and how is it different from police hiding a GPS tracker in my coat? Or is that OK too? *NM* Aeryn - 26/08/2010 05:12:30 AM 426 Views
It does seem wrong snoopcester - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 913 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1054 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 941 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 844 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 941 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 954 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 419 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 409 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 893 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 944 Views
but effective random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 820 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 953 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer random thoughts - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 808 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 930 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 946 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. LadyLorraine - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 859 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1104 Views
all the more reason to listen to a police officer if they point a taser at you *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:43:46 PM 400 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* Floffe - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 435 Views
It was Franklin. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 952 Views
i do love that quote LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 838 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 791 Views
it's a lovely musical LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 770 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Macharius - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 854 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 993 Views
The law is not always just or correct. Legislators make mistakes and can be corrupt. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly - 25/08/2010 09:06:55 PM 408 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 1003 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 942 Views
I don't think that's true. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 855 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign random thoughts - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 933 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 950 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized Ryan - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 1011 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1054 Views
I think... Hezzah - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 913 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. Gher - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 803 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 840 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* Dan - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 406 Views
ummmm.... damookster - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 894 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 350 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though Floffe - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 830 Views
I have 3 words for you... Bramhodoulos - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1114 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* random thoughts - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 405 Views
right damookster - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 930 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. Joel - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 888 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes