Active Users:641 Time:14/11/2024 04:47:16 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
yah, i know there are instances like that LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM
I was just giving an example of when I wouldn't EXPECT to have visual privacy. I may be legally endowed it, but I wouldn't expect people to not be able/allowed to see me.

I'm pretty sure if he'd just seen them and complained, he wouldn't have been given peeping tom charges. Probably just told to shove off.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1390 Views
what a stupid decision... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 799 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 954 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 810 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 773 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 824 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 795 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 873 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 754 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho moondog - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 892 Views
and how is it different from police hiding a GPS tracker in my coat? Or is that OK too? *NM* Aeryn - 26/08/2010 05:12:30 AM 387 Views
It does seem wrong snoopcester - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 824 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 969 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 834 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 751 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 837 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 860 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 382 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 370 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 810 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 846 Views
but effective random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 721 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 853 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer random thoughts - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 715 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 843 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 848 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. LadyLorraine - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 762 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 992 Views
all the more reason to listen to a police officer if they point a taser at you *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:43:46 PM 361 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* Floffe - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 400 Views
It was Franklin. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 858 Views
i do love that quote LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 744 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 699 Views
it's a lovely musical LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 685 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Macharius - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 762 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 898 Views
The law is not always just or correct. Legislators make mistakes and can be corrupt. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly - 25/08/2010 09:06:55 PM 370 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 919 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 839 Views
I don't think that's true. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 768 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign random thoughts - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 847 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 864 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized Ryan - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 920 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 953 Views
I think... Hezzah - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 812 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. Gher - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 706 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 747 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* Dan - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 365 Views
ummmm.... damookster - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 800 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 315 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though Floffe - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 740 Views
I have 3 words for you... Bramhodoulos - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1021 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* random thoughts - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 366 Views
right damookster - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 834 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. Joel - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 799 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes