Active Users:1072 Time:22/11/2024 09:55:51 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
yah, i know there are instances like that LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM
I was just giving an example of when I wouldn't EXPECT to have visual privacy. I may be legally endowed it, but I wouldn't expect people to not be able/allowed to see me.

I'm pretty sure if he'd just seen them and complained, he wouldn't have been given peeping tom charges. Probably just told to shove off.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1391 Views
what a stupid decision... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 800 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 956 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 812 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 775 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 826 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 796 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 875 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 755 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho moondog - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 892 Views
and how is it different from police hiding a GPS tracker in my coat? Or is that OK too? *NM* Aeryn - 26/08/2010 05:12:30 AM 388 Views
It does seem wrong snoopcester - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 828 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 970 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 835 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 753 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 839 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 863 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 384 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 372 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 811 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 850 Views
but effective random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 725 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 856 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer random thoughts - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 717 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 848 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 848 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. LadyLorraine - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 764 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 995 Views
all the more reason to listen to a police officer if they point a taser at you *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:43:46 PM 362 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* Floffe - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 402 Views
It was Franklin. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 859 Views
i do love that quote LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 746 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 700 Views
it's a lovely musical LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 685 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Macharius - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 766 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 902 Views
The law is not always just or correct. Legislators make mistakes and can be corrupt. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly - 25/08/2010 09:06:55 PM 373 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 922 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 844 Views
I don't think that's true. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 771 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign random thoughts - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 849 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 866 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized Ryan - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 923 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 955 Views
I think... Hezzah - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 815 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. Gher - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 707 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 748 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* Dan - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 369 Views
ummmm.... damookster - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 801 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 316 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though Floffe - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 741 Views
I have 3 words for you... Bramhodoulos - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1022 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* random thoughts - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 367 Views
right damookster - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 835 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. Joel - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 800 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes