Active Users:809 Time:24/12/2024 12:02:12 PM
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM
and more that people should expect privacy despite the lack of fence. If you make the distinction that someone with a fence can't have their home invaded by the police, but if they magically didn't have a fence it would be okay, how is that right? A driveway is RIGHT BY a person's home and sleeping quarters. Would the courts also rule against someone who thought someone was trying to rob the and assaulted the individual...only to find out it was an officer?

A driveway is private or it is not. Even if you have to cross a fence to get TO the driveway, there is not typically a fence between the house and the drive. Once you're to the drive, the "privacy" is typically the same.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1406 Views
what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 817 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 972 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 829 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 793 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 839 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 812 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 892 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 772 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 914 Views
It does seem wrong - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 842 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 981 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 851 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 767 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 860 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 877 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 388 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 377 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 826 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 866 Views
but effective - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 743 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 876 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 729 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 865 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 867 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 781 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1009 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 406 Views
It was Franklin. - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 876 Views
i do love that quote - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 765 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 715 Views
it's a lovely musical - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 698 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 784 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 915 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 935 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 861 Views
I don't think that's true. - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 784 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 868 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 880 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 941 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 972 Views
I think... - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 834 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 374 Views
ummmm.... - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 818 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 320 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 755 Views
I have 3 words for you... - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1037 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 375 Views
right - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 849 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 817 Views

Reply to Message