Active Users:530 Time:25/02/2025 05:07:37 AM
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? random thoughts Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM
It is cheaper so it might become more common but from a privacy point of it really isn't that much different. I think the gated property thing is a bit over rated as well since all they would need to do follow you until you stop at a public place and attach it there. Yes people with privacy fences have a greater expectation of privacy behind the fence then people do not have on just like people who park in their garage would have a greater expectation of privacy then people who don’t. Arguing that people can not expect privacy behind a privacy fence because everyone does not have one is like arguing that people should not expect privacy in their home because there are homeless people.

Part of the problem is people see this as being simply a case for the courts. If you oppose then get laws passed to make it illegal.

Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1456 Views
what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 856 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1015 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 888 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 841 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 886 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 861 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 946 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 822 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 959 Views
It does seem wrong - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 888 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1030 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 917 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 820 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 916 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 929 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 409 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 398 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 870 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 919 Views
but effective - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 794 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 925 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 783 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 905 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 920 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 835 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1072 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 424 Views
It was Franklin. - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 926 Views
i do love that quote - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 817 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 768 Views
it's a lovely musical - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 746 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 831 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 969 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 981 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 918 Views
I don't think that's true. - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 833 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 910 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 927 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 988 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1029 Views
I think... - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 891 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 396 Views
ummmm.... - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 867 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 339 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 803 Views
I have 3 words for you... - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1089 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 396 Views
right - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 905 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 865 Views

Reply to Message