Active Users:602 Time:06/05/2026 01:16:08 AM
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? random thoughts Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM
It is cheaper so it might become more common but from a privacy point of it really isn't that much different. I think the gated property thing is a bit over rated as well since all they would need to do follow you until you stop at a public place and attach it there. Yes people with privacy fences have a greater expectation of privacy behind the fence then people do not have on just like people who park in their garage would have a greater expectation of privacy then people who don’t. Arguing that people can not expect privacy behind a privacy fence because everyone does not have one is like arguing that people should not expect privacy in their home because there are homeless people.

Part of the problem is people see this as being simply a case for the courts. If you oppose then get laws passed to make it illegal.

Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1751 Views
what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 1090 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1301 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 1115 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 1051 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 1133 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 1124 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 1135 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 1036 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 1171 Views
It does seem wrong - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 1103 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1255 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 1139 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 1015 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 1134 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 1161 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 510 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 567 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 1097 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 1138 Views
but effective - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 998 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 1150 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 1003 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 1155 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 1129 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 1055 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1370 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 566 Views
It was Franklin. - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 1164 Views
i do love that quote - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 1057 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 985 Views
it's a lovely musical - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 986 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 1038 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 1271 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 1191 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 1145 Views
I don't think that's true. - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 1068 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 1156 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 1198 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 1273 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1253 Views
I think... - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 1117 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 989 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 1052 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 532 Views
ummmm.... - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 1073 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 442 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 1010 Views
I have 3 words for you... - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1317 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 511 Views
right - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 1124 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 1076 Views

Reply to Message