Active Users:894 Time:06/03/2026 11:09:02 PM
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? random thoughts Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM
It is cheaper so it might become more common but from a privacy point of it really isn't that much different. I think the gated property thing is a bit over rated as well since all they would need to do follow you until you stop at a public place and attach it there. Yes people with privacy fences have a greater expectation of privacy behind the fence then people do not have on just like people who park in their garage would have a greater expectation of privacy then people who don’t. Arguing that people can not expect privacy behind a privacy fence because everyone does not have one is like arguing that people should not expect privacy in their home because there are homeless people.

Part of the problem is people see this as being simply a case for the courts. If you oppose then get laws passed to make it illegal.

Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1712 Views
what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 1055 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1263 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 1079 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 1014 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 1098 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 1082 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 1106 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 1004 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 1136 Views
It does seem wrong - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 1067 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1216 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 1107 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 980 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 1092 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 1130 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 495 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 548 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 1067 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 1100 Views
but effective - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 967 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 1114 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 956 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 1116 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 1094 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 1023 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1338 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 550 Views
It was Franklin. - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 1136 Views
i do love that quote - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 1017 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 954 Views
it's a lovely musical - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 947 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 999 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 1239 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 1155 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 1109 Views
I don't think that's true. - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 1032 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 1115 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 1156 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 1240 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1217 Views
I think... - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 1074 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 955 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 1017 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 509 Views
ummmm.... - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 1039 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 425 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 977 Views
I have 3 words for you... - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1285 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 495 Views
right - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 1091 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 1046 Views

Reply to Message