Active Users:986 Time:02/11/2026 03:03:50 AM
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? random thoughts Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM
It is cheaper so it might become more common but from a privacy point of it really isn't that much different. I think the gated property thing is a bit over rated as well since all they would need to do follow you until you stop at a public place and attach it there. Yes people with privacy fences have a greater expectation of privacy behind the fence then people do not have on just like people who park in their garage would have a greater expectation of privacy then people who don’t. Arguing that people can not expect privacy behind a privacy fence because everyone does not have one is like arguing that people should not expect privacy in their home because there are homeless people.

Part of the problem is people see this as being simply a case for the courts. If you oppose then get laws passed to make it illegal.

Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1858 Views
what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 1188 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1409 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 1211 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 1152 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 1235 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 1222 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 1249 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 1135 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 1280 Views
It does seem wrong - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 1208 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1351 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 1236 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 1114 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 1238 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 1262 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 579 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 624 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 1210 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 1229 Views
but effective - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 1105 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 1259 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 1122 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 1268 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 1242 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 1159 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1475 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 623 Views
It was Franklin. - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 1278 Views
i do love that quote - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 1157 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 1090 Views
it's a lovely musical - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 1098 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 1146 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 1374 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 1295 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 1253 Views
I don't think that's true. - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 1169 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 1290 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 1305 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 1374 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1357 Views
I think... - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 1230 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 1095 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 1142 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 587 Views
ummmm.... - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 1173 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 496 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 1112 Views
I have 3 words for you... - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1411 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 570 Views
right - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 1219 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 1204 Views

Reply to Message