well, and considering the radius of the radiation...
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 04:11:31 PM
I'm not sure exactly how far that would be, but even if they'd built up more, it could be argued that it's still mostly "ground zero"
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
With all this "Ground Zero Mosque" blather, I wonder if any ever stopped and asked...
24/08/2010 10:57:04 PM
- 717 Views
Why would this be offensive?
25/08/2010 02:39:26 AM
- 444 Views
they've placed a temple to american consumerism in hiroshima? *NM*
25/08/2010 06:53:49 AM
- 174 Views
The only thing offensive about it is that they're eating the food at McDonald's.
25/08/2010 04:01:56 AM
- 477 Views
Already answered it
25/08/2010 07:40:55 AM
- 470 Views
Not sure what you mean. *NM*
25/08/2010 04:18:39 AM
- 178 Views
Considering the overblown rhetoric about the "hallowedness" of Ground Zero...
25/08/2010 07:37:50 AM
- 408 Views
Er... what? (brief summary for the Youtube-phobic)
25/08/2010 06:20:20 AM
- 492 Views
Hiroshima...McDonald's. Ground Zero...community center....
25/08/2010 07:39:48 AM
- 456 Views
I... guess.
25/08/2010 07:58:28 AM
- 470 Views
And most of it would be "ground zero" for the atomic bomb. *NM*
25/08/2010 09:14:26 AM
- 187 Views
I'd imagine all of it is when you factor in the debris rule thats ome want to apply to Ground Zero *NM*
25/08/2010 10:21:52 AM
- 171 Views
That's what I meant, although the city undoubtedly has expanded beyond its 1945 borders. *NM*
25/08/2010 10:34:15 AM
- 173 Views
Ah, my bad
25/08/2010 11:27:12 AM
- 457 Views
well, and considering the radius of the radiation...
25/08/2010 04:11:31 PM
- 463 Views