...if this might be more offensive?
If they had any sense they'd be eating okonomiyaki.
Care to take up Dan's request/challenge?
The point was there's nothing "offensive" at all about either one. I'm just noting the silliness of the xenophobic arguments about "disrespecting hallowed ground".
I thought you might have actually had something to say on the matter, complete with a Thompsonian Marxist slant!
I once spent a long weekend in Hiroshima to see and catch up a friend. The Atom Bomb Dome, Peace Park and Peace Museum were the first places I had her show me around. They all made a mark on me, especially the cenotaph in the park. The museum, though, pissed me off more than a little with its account of "history".
南無阿弥陀仏!
With all this "Ground Zero Mosque" blather, I wonder if any ever stopped and asked...
24/08/2010 10:57:04 PM
- 717 Views
Why would this be offensive?
25/08/2010 02:39:26 AM
- 443 Views
they've placed a temple to american consumerism in hiroshima? *NM*
25/08/2010 06:53:49 AM
- 174 Views
The only thing offensive about it is that they're eating the food at McDonald's.
25/08/2010 04:01:56 AM
- 477 Views
Already answered it
25/08/2010 07:40:55 AM
- 469 Views
Oh. How disappointing.
25/08/2010 08:20:02 AM
- 466 Views
Not sure what you mean. *NM*
25/08/2010 04:18:39 AM
- 178 Views
Considering the overblown rhetoric about the "hallowedness" of Ground Zero...
25/08/2010 07:37:50 AM
- 408 Views
Er... what? (brief summary for the Youtube-phobic)
25/08/2010 06:20:20 AM
- 492 Views
Hiroshima...McDonald's. Ground Zero...community center....
25/08/2010 07:39:48 AM
- 456 Views
I... guess.
25/08/2010 07:58:28 AM
- 470 Views
And most of it would be "ground zero" for the atomic bomb. *NM*
25/08/2010 09:14:26 AM
- 187 Views
I'd imagine all of it is when you factor in the debris rule thats ome want to apply to Ground Zero *NM*
25/08/2010 10:21:52 AM
- 171 Views
That's what I meant, although the city undoubtedly has expanded beyond its 1945 borders. *NM*
25/08/2010 10:34:15 AM
- 173 Views