The Gadsden Purchase was a pittance and an afterthought, as I'm sure you're aware.
Joel Send a noteboard - 18/08/2010 12:36:24 PM
I would agree that we didn't outright "take" the land, but it wasn't a friendly business transaction either.
I said purchased, I didn't say 'cheerful friendly deal' But let's be honest, Mexico controlled the Southwest as 'ink on a map' from 1821 on for a couple decades of almost non-stop civil war with the official president changing on a yearly (and often more often) basis. The Mexicans are certainly free to blame Santa Anna if they want, but by any reasonable standard the land is ours fair and square and more than fair, the natives might have gotten screwed, but not by us.
Frankly, I'm not even entirely sure why we made it. According to Wikipedia it was about the Union-Pacific and Jefferson Davis' dreams of territorial acquisition while Secy. of War. To this day about all we have to show for $10 million is Tuscon.
As a Texan, I know full well why the US went to war with Mexico, and while Santa Anna is much to blame (had he upheld the 1824 Constitution as he was sworn to do TX might still be part of Mexico, and the terms of OUR treaty required him to forever renounce the Presidency. ) What's a lot more hazy is why that war, its casus belli or its outcome justify the Mexican Cession. What that boils down to is the US Army occupying all of Mexico, and allowing Mexico proper to regain its independence after extracting a hefty pound of flesh (probably more than anything because our territory was expanding TOO quickly at the time, forcing a showdown between "traditionalists" who wanted, on one hand, to restrict slavery to its historical limits and, on the other hand, to preserve the historic balance of power between agricultural slave and industrial free states. ) We screwed the natives more than adequately after we took control though; where's Geronimos skull? Don't tell the Comanche, Apache or Navajo that the US was blameless in the Mexican Cession (to be fair, troubles with the first two date back to the acquisition of TX, but most of TX is outside the easternmost range for the Comanches during their dominance. )
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
At what point does it become ok to take over a country?
16/08/2010 04:25:09 PM
- 1229 Views
why would we want to make Mexico our problem? *NM*
16/08/2010 04:30:48 PM
- 330 Views
Yeah that's why i don't want us to take over. I think the US is already too big as is *NM*
16/08/2010 04:37:41 PM
- 303 Views
One might argue it already is. The other way around too, though. *NM*
16/08/2010 04:44:19 PM
- 289 Views
I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride.
16/08/2010 04:51:38 PM
- 772 Views
Re: I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride.
16/08/2010 05:11:49 PM
- 635 Views
Actually, make that number 120 to 150. *NM*
16/08/2010 05:14:15 PM
- 301 Views
We don't invade countries we can't locate on the map...
16/08/2010 06:01:43 PM
- 847 Views
So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself?
16/08/2010 06:11:43 PM
- 593 Views
Re: So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself?
16/08/2010 06:30:56 PM
- 817 Views
When they get on your nerves or have something you want, preferably both
16/08/2010 05:04:10 PM
- 761 Views
I agree we should attack Canada instead
16/08/2010 05:19:48 PM
- 755 Views
Yeah, but they don't gouge us for the oil, cost the same as anyone else *NM*
16/08/2010 05:49:38 PM
- 311 Views
I would legalize drugs ten times over before I would annex Mexico.
16/08/2010 05:36:37 PM
- 831 Views
"I would stop doing a bad thing 10 times over before I did a worse thing"? WTF? *NM*
16/08/2010 06:04:48 PM
- 384 Views
Read the original post. He proposes annexing Mexico due to the drug problem.
16/08/2010 06:28:54 PM
- 799 Views
He's just nitpicking on your phrasing in the subject line. I think. *NM*
16/08/2010 06:37:17 PM
- 293 Views
that sounds like a much better immigration solution idea than "let's build a GIGANTIC FENCE!!!" *NM*
16/08/2010 06:33:46 PM
- 313 Views
Work Visas might help, but...
16/08/2010 06:51:11 PM
- 948 Views
Oh i know it's not a complete solution and i have no problem with a fence
16/08/2010 07:43:26 PM
- 694 Views
Just so long as we're both on the 'multi-front solution' page
16/08/2010 08:35:06 PM
- 608 Views
it's also worth noting that no one is proposing throwing out the Cubans
16/08/2010 08:54:46 PM
- 756 Views
When the US says so. We are the bosses of the World, are we not? *NM*
16/08/2010 08:06:08 PM
- 310 Views
Not even Hitler's Germany? (if he never went to war but just stayed put) Reply to Yuna *NM*
16/08/2010 09:24:41 PM
- 401 Views
If he had never gone to war, that would also have meant no Holocaust... *NM*
16/08/2010 09:28:16 PM
- 304 Views
Really? Why is that? I'm not too terribly familiar with Hitler's reasons for mass genocide *NM*
16/08/2010 09:30:48 PM
- 307 Views
Dachau opened in '33, Nuremburg Laws were '35
16/08/2010 09:36:59 PM
- 687 Views
Ok that's what I was thinking
16/08/2010 09:45:51 PM
- 695 Views
Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating".
16/08/2010 09:52:37 PM
- 732 Views
Re: Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating".
16/08/2010 09:54:29 PM
- 662 Views
I don't know if there's really anything to specifically compare it to...
16/08/2010 10:00:59 PM
- 830 Views
Also, perhaps someone should just invoke the (variation of the) Godwin Law and stop this whole thing
16/08/2010 10:02:23 PM
- 738 Views
Ah,
16/08/2010 10:04:39 PM
- 643 Views
Nah, more like, I know I shouldn't have done this, but I couldn't resist. *NM*
16/08/2010 10:07:35 PM
- 326 Views
Well, you'll note I didn't make that causal relation you attribute to me.
16/08/2010 09:55:39 PM
- 773 Views
The Dachau follow up was bookkeeping
16/08/2010 10:05:35 PM
- 722 Views
I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue.
16/08/2010 10:09:16 PM
- 784 Views
Re: I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue.
16/08/2010 10:19:19 PM
- 700 Views
The US already took half of Mexico, so why not the other half?
16/08/2010 09:57:56 PM
- 771 Views
"Took" is an unfriendly word, we purchased it *NM*
16/08/2010 10:21:58 PM
- 311 Views
yes after a messy political and physical "conflict"
16/08/2010 10:53:22 PM
- 742 Views
There was also the Gasdsen Purchase
17/08/2010 12:30:21 AM
- 685 Views
The Gadsden Purchase was a pittance and an afterthought, as I'm sure you're aware.
18/08/2010 12:36:24 PM
- 606 Views
and why did it belong to Mexico to begin with? *NM*
17/08/2010 01:28:28 AM
- 343 Views
same way it seems to be the way most people who own the Americas came to own it.
17/08/2010 01:46:49 AM
- 561 Views
my best friend is an illegal and is going back to mexico in a few months
16/08/2010 11:28:11 PM
- 737 Views
every issue is simpler when you don't have faces to represent it for you. *NM*
16/08/2010 11:29:38 PM
- 313 Views
We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 12:58:37 AM
- 584 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 02:39:11 AM
- 654 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 03:34:59 AM
- 816 Views
I think maybe we've had enough of nation building for a while *NM*
17/08/2010 02:45:22 AM
- 293 Views