At what point does it become ok to take over a country?
Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 16/08/2010 04:25:09 PM
I'm starting to think it's about time for the US to "annex" Mexico. I live in South Texas and I was recently talking to one of my Hispanic friends about the illegal immigration/drug problem with our neighbors to the south. We had an intelligent debate about the issue and we both agreed that nobody is paying attention the real problem with illegal immigration: Mexico.
Mexico is such a God-awful country that people are fleeing in droves (no offense to anybody from Mexico or who has family there. I have many, many Hispanic friends who agree that Mexico is a dangerous place. It sucks because some areas are really beautiful). So I told my friend, tongue-in-cheek, that we should just take Mexico over. We laughed about it and discussed other things.
However, the thought has stuck with me ever since. I started thinking about the history of this world and how countries have come into being. So my philosophical question for the day is, once a country is established, does it have the right to always exist as is? At what point does a country deserve to have better leadership?
By the way, I don't think we should really take over Mexico. It's just frustration with the immigration debate and the drug violence. A lot of people here in South Texas are affected by it. I just wish Mexico could get its act together. I wonder, though, how the Mexican people would feel about being a part of the US. Do a majority of them have national pride? Hmmm food for thought
Mexico is such a God-awful country that people are fleeing in droves (no offense to anybody from Mexico or who has family there. I have many, many Hispanic friends who agree that Mexico is a dangerous place. It sucks because some areas are really beautiful). So I told my friend, tongue-in-cheek, that we should just take Mexico over. We laughed about it and discussed other things.
However, the thought has stuck with me ever since. I started thinking about the history of this world and how countries have come into being. So my philosophical question for the day is, once a country is established, does it have the right to always exist as is? At what point does a country deserve to have better leadership?
By the way, I don't think we should really take over Mexico. It's just frustration with the immigration debate and the drug violence. A lot of people here in South Texas are affected by it. I just wish Mexico could get its act together. I wonder, though, how the Mexican people would feel about being a part of the US. Do a majority of them have national pride? Hmmm food for thought
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
This message last edited by Dark Knight on 16/08/2010 at 04:26:41 PM
At what point does it become ok to take over a country?
16/08/2010 04:25:09 PM
- 1230 Views
why would we want to make Mexico our problem? *NM*
16/08/2010 04:30:48 PM
- 330 Views
Yeah that's why i don't want us to take over. I think the US is already too big as is *NM*
16/08/2010 04:37:41 PM
- 303 Views
One might argue it already is. The other way around too, though. *NM*
16/08/2010 04:44:19 PM
- 289 Views
I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride.
16/08/2010 04:51:38 PM
- 772 Views
Re: I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride.
16/08/2010 05:11:49 PM
- 635 Views
Actually, make that number 120 to 150. *NM*
16/08/2010 05:14:15 PM
- 301 Views
We don't invade countries we can't locate on the map...
16/08/2010 06:01:43 PM
- 847 Views
So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself?
16/08/2010 06:11:43 PM
- 593 Views
Re: So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself?
16/08/2010 06:30:56 PM
- 817 Views
When they get on your nerves or have something you want, preferably both
16/08/2010 05:04:10 PM
- 761 Views
I agree we should attack Canada instead
16/08/2010 05:19:48 PM
- 755 Views
Yeah, but they don't gouge us for the oil, cost the same as anyone else *NM*
16/08/2010 05:49:38 PM
- 311 Views
I would legalize drugs ten times over before I would annex Mexico.
16/08/2010 05:36:37 PM
- 831 Views
"I would stop doing a bad thing 10 times over before I did a worse thing"? WTF? *NM*
16/08/2010 06:04:48 PM
- 384 Views
Read the original post. He proposes annexing Mexico due to the drug problem.
16/08/2010 06:28:54 PM
- 799 Views
He's just nitpicking on your phrasing in the subject line. I think. *NM*
16/08/2010 06:37:17 PM
- 293 Views
that sounds like a much better immigration solution idea than "let's build a GIGANTIC FENCE!!!" *NM*
16/08/2010 06:33:46 PM
- 313 Views
Work Visas might help, but...
16/08/2010 06:51:11 PM
- 949 Views
Oh i know it's not a complete solution and i have no problem with a fence
16/08/2010 07:43:26 PM
- 694 Views
Just so long as we're both on the 'multi-front solution' page
16/08/2010 08:35:06 PM
- 608 Views
it's also worth noting that no one is proposing throwing out the Cubans
16/08/2010 08:54:46 PM
- 756 Views
When the US says so. We are the bosses of the World, are we not? *NM*
16/08/2010 08:06:08 PM
- 311 Views
Not even Hitler's Germany? (if he never went to war but just stayed put) Reply to Yuna *NM*
16/08/2010 09:24:41 PM
- 401 Views
If he had never gone to war, that would also have meant no Holocaust... *NM*
16/08/2010 09:28:16 PM
- 304 Views
Really? Why is that? I'm not too terribly familiar with Hitler's reasons for mass genocide *NM*
16/08/2010 09:30:48 PM
- 307 Views
Dachau opened in '33, Nuremburg Laws were '35
16/08/2010 09:36:59 PM
- 687 Views
Ok that's what I was thinking
16/08/2010 09:45:51 PM
- 695 Views
Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating".
16/08/2010 09:52:37 PM
- 733 Views
Re: Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating".
16/08/2010 09:54:29 PM
- 662 Views
I don't know if there's really anything to specifically compare it to...
16/08/2010 10:00:59 PM
- 830 Views
Also, perhaps someone should just invoke the (variation of the) Godwin Law and stop this whole thing
16/08/2010 10:02:23 PM
- 738 Views
Ah,
16/08/2010 10:04:39 PM
- 643 Views
Nah, more like, I know I shouldn't have done this, but I couldn't resist. *NM*
16/08/2010 10:07:35 PM
- 326 Views
Well, you'll note I didn't make that causal relation you attribute to me.
16/08/2010 09:55:39 PM
- 773 Views
The Dachau follow up was bookkeeping
16/08/2010 10:05:35 PM
- 723 Views
I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue.
16/08/2010 10:09:16 PM
- 784 Views
Re: I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue.
16/08/2010 10:19:19 PM
- 700 Views
The US already took half of Mexico, so why not the other half?
16/08/2010 09:57:56 PM
- 771 Views
"Took" is an unfriendly word, we purchased it *NM*
16/08/2010 10:21:58 PM
- 311 Views
yes after a messy political and physical "conflict"
16/08/2010 10:53:22 PM
- 742 Views
There was also the Gasdsen Purchase
17/08/2010 12:30:21 AM
- 685 Views
The Gadsden Purchase was a pittance and an afterthought, as I'm sure you're aware.
18/08/2010 12:36:24 PM
- 606 Views
and why did it belong to Mexico to begin with? *NM*
17/08/2010 01:28:28 AM
- 343 Views
same way it seems to be the way most people who own the Americas came to own it.
17/08/2010 01:46:49 AM
- 561 Views
my best friend is an illegal and is going back to mexico in a few months
16/08/2010 11:28:11 PM
- 737 Views
every issue is simpler when you don't have faces to represent it for you. *NM*
16/08/2010 11:29:38 PM
- 313 Views
We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 12:58:37 AM
- 584 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 02:39:11 AM
- 654 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 03:34:59 AM
- 817 Views
I think maybe we've had enough of nation building for a while *NM*
17/08/2010 02:45:22 AM
- 293 Views