Because you're denying them something that every person wants - a way to validate their relationship with their life partner. You're so proud of yourself that you don't throw rocks at gay people but you're more than willing to aid in their emotional obliteration and to deny them spiritual fulfilment.
I'm denying them a way to validate their relationship with their life partner....ok. So now having external validation of a personal relationship is that important? That validation is considered a right? Affording that validation to someone while imposing their opinions on me is ok?
When it comes to validating a relationship, things may begin to get tricy. Are we going to validate a relationship between any two individuals? Are we going to validate a relationship between any group of individuals?
And on a side note, do not ever presume to dictate to me my emotional state (as you did in noting pride). And it is a weak person indeed who is searching for spiritual fulfilment from a relationship with a flawed individual. But as I said...a side note.
This is my boyfriend of 26 years... if I die he's not entitled to anything. WTF? My teenage sister has a boyfriend. Can you seriously not see the difference in gravity between a husband and a boyfriend, wife and girlfriend?
Who's to say that your boyfriend of 26 years isn't entled to anything. Write a will. As for the gravity difference...well now we are definately treading into an area which is far removed from the secular world. Yes....I do see a vast difference between the two. And that is a *very* big point in all of this. That difference is that the a marriage commitment is intended to be life long and is blessed by God. Do some marriages end in divorce? Yes...and the Bible even gives reasons why this is acceptable.
Interestingly enough, the original post had a strong conversational element of forcing churches to perform homosexual marriage. A big point that I wanted to originally point out that there is a big difference between two murderers (Bonnie & Clyde) getting married and two men. That difference is that going into the marriage everyone has sin...if you had to be sinless to get married, only Jesus would have been eligable (with no woman to marry). However with two men getting married, that would be entering into a habitual lifestyle of sin, without repentance or shame. Unrepentant sin is a big deal with God...and as such, it couldn't stand at the center of relationship that people are then asking God to bless.
At least bigots in posts lower down on the board admit that they are homophobic and find the practice intolerable. It's shocking that you actually consider yourself to NOT be a bigot. You claim to have gay friends, but I cannot imagine a gay person who would put up with any of these opinions.
Say what you will, but I'm not a bigot. And do you know how I know that? Because I know my flaws...I know them well, and that's not one of them. Ask the people here who have met me. Ask them if I come across as being a bigot. I may not agree with a chosen lifestyle, but that doesn't mean that I get all preachy or whatever around people. I'm not anti-gay...since I approved of that law that was overturned regarding gay sex being illegal. What I'm against is you telling me that my thoughts and beliefs are invalid. What I'm against is you dictating to me that this is the way it is, and you better deal with it. What I'm against is you telling me that my say in the matter is worthless (which it clearly is since that judge went against what the people voted for). What I'm agasint is the entitlement mentality that everything is a right....marriage, health care, home/property ownership, a job. This isn't some look at me, martyrdom, attention whoring post or emotional outburst on my part. Believe me...its certainly not. Long have the days been when I would get worked up over what was said about me here.
~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Gay Marriage
12/08/2010 10:23:19 AM
- 1834 Views
I disagree on the latter part
12/08/2010 12:04:15 PM
- 1209 Views
I follow your point...
12/08/2010 12:14:17 PM
- 1192 Views
Suspect you would find plenty of denominations that would argue with you rather strenuously.
12/08/2010 12:24:55 PM
- 1187 Views
See, that's what I'm saying...
12/08/2010 07:37:26 PM
- 1152 Views
You didn't read my post.
12/08/2010 09:10:21 PM
- 1064 Views
Actually, you didn't read my post
12/08/2010 09:23:54 PM
- 1105 Views
Um, you're wrong.
12/08/2010 09:37:13 PM
- 1114 Views
Re: Um, you're wrong.
12/08/2010 09:44:17 PM
- 1072 Views
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale. And no, he described it accurately. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:53:31 PM
- 563 Views
You're still wrong.
12/08/2010 09:54:55 PM
- 1209 Views
Re: You're still wrong.
12/08/2010 09:58:26 PM
- 1065 Views
Again, you are still wrong.
12/08/2010 10:04:42 PM
- 1113 Views
Re: Again, you are still wrong.
12/08/2010 10:17:13 PM
- 961 Views
Wrong definition of "club"
12/08/2010 10:30:52 PM
- 1210 Views
Re: Wrong definition of "club"
12/08/2010 10:40:55 PM
- 1116 Views
Also
12/08/2010 10:02:44 PM
- 1159 Views
And wrong again.
12/08/2010 10:08:24 PM
- 1183 Views
Not so quick!
12/08/2010 10:21:31 PM
- 1019 Views
Yes, so quick!
12/08/2010 10:32:13 PM
- 966 Views
Let's be reasonable here
12/08/2010 10:41:53 PM
- 1076 Views
Why do you get to judge?
12/08/2010 10:48:57 PM
- 1103 Views
I don't
12/08/2010 10:53:21 PM
- 998 Views
OK.
12/08/2010 10:58:22 PM
- 1109 Views
Re: OK.
12/08/2010 11:03:50 PM
- 1041 Views
Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith.
12/08/2010 11:14:03 PM
- 1004 Views
Re: Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith.
12/08/2010 11:23:35 PM
- 1121 Views
Then please stop.
12/08/2010 11:01:05 PM
- 1078 Views
What's wrong with discussion?
12/08/2010 11:05:48 PM
- 1018 Views
Discussion? Nothing. Your assertions about other people's views, something.
12/08/2010 11:09:48 PM
- 1046 Views
What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
12/08/2010 10:12:54 PM
- 918 Views
Re: What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
12/08/2010 10:23:36 PM
- 1064 Views
Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer.
12/08/2010 10:36:48 PM
- 1022 Views
Re: Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer.
12/08/2010 10:46:22 PM
- 1135 Views
Not entirely true either... or, well, true as far as Brown goes.
12/08/2010 10:08:42 PM
- 1030 Views
Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need
12/08/2010 09:38:33 PM
- 1104 Views
Re: Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need
12/08/2010 09:55:05 PM
- 1037 Views
Gah.
12/08/2010 09:59:45 PM
- 989 Views
What a mature response.
12/08/2010 10:11:00 PM
- 1171 Views
I can't speak for Rebekah, but I don't think the issue is that your points are invalid per se.
12/08/2010 10:22:30 PM
- 1010 Views
Um
12/08/2010 09:46:43 PM
- 1136 Views
That's a very good question. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:49:05 PM
- 532 Views
It makes no sense
12/08/2010 04:29:24 PM
- 974 Views
Re: It makes no sense
12/08/2010 07:39:25 PM
- 1054 Views
Re: It makes no sense
12/08/2010 07:41:02 PM
- 1127 Views
Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder...
12/08/2010 09:08:53 PM
- 967 Views
Re: Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder...
12/08/2010 09:42:21 PM
- 1080 Views
What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin?
12/08/2010 09:45:33 PM
- 1136 Views
Re: What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin?
13/08/2010 11:04:02 AM
- 1072 Views
Wow, it's almost like an entire denomination believes that! *NM*
13/08/2010 03:41:07 PM
- 516 Views
13/08/2010 03:43:26 PM
- 877 Views
Yeah, that's the Roman Catholic basis against masturbation and contraception. *NM*
13/08/2010 04:12:00 PM
- 515 Views
Yes
13/08/2010 04:22:58 PM
- 924 Views
Dude....please at least have a working knowledge of the Bible before you spout off.
12/08/2010 10:47:13 PM
- 957 Views
secular marriage is decoupled from religious marriage
12/08/2010 02:50:43 PM
- 1148 Views
Simple, require the legal and religious marriage to be performed separately.
12/08/2010 02:58:43 PM
- 985 Views
And they are, in fact, separate right now in the US. They're just called the same thing.
12/08/2010 03:29:26 PM
- 1033 Views
It's not the same name that's confusing so much as the single ceremony. Or so it seems to me.
12/08/2010 03:37:20 PM
- 1041 Views
I disagree. I think giving the legal institution the same name as the sacrament is the problem.
12/08/2010 03:59:43 PM
- 1055 Views
What in the world would that accomplish?
12/08/2010 03:44:32 PM
- 1069 Views
Provide some much-needed clarity, evidently.
12/08/2010 03:49:33 PM
- 919 Views
the problem is it would be changing a centuries old tradition..
12/08/2010 04:26:47 PM
- 930 Views
heheheheheheheHAHAHAHEHEHehehehehahheeh*cough*
12/08/2010 04:55:09 PM
- 938 Views
thats OK I am sure you will get over it
12/08/2010 05:22:08 PM
- 975 Views
Just guessing, but I think it was the "centuries old tradition" that set off the giggle fit.
12/08/2010 07:25:38 PM
- 1098 Views
Really? I was hoping for something better
12/08/2010 10:06:00 PM
- 1028 Views
So government recognition makes your religion meaningful?
12/08/2010 10:11:54 PM
- 1114 Views
not my religion I'm agnostic
12/08/2010 10:34:40 PM
- 978 Views
I'm not far left, thank you very much. *NM*
12/08/2010 10:20:31 PM
- 587 Views
no but your are European and that slants your views *NM*
12/08/2010 10:36:01 PM
- 578 Views
Simples
12/08/2010 09:30:31 PM
- 1059 Views
there are about 140 post ranging from boyscouts to infant babtism
12/08/2010 10:57:46 PM
- 1057 Views
So.
14/08/2010 01:27:59 AM
- 896 Views
sorry I responded I forgot what a tool you are. my bad
14/08/2010 02:48:57 AM
- 1415 Views
You spout some utter gibberish then dish out insults when called on it? Very funny
15/08/2010 12:47:04 PM
- 1240 Views
Agreed *NM*
12/08/2010 03:45:04 PM
- 465 Views
I love you, Camilla
12/08/2010 04:02:15 PM
- 857 Views
Re: I love you, Camilla
12/08/2010 04:04:10 PM
- 1047 Views
A couple of things
12/08/2010 12:58:09 PM
- 1028 Views
there is major flaw in your argument
12/08/2010 03:31:45 PM
- 1164 Views
Re: there is major flaw in your argument
12/08/2010 04:01:32 PM
- 1048 Views
I should clarify that I support gay marriage
12/08/2010 05:20:36 PM
- 984 Views
One point about Prop. 8
12/08/2010 07:38:55 PM
- 1027 Views
I know that is the commonl;y held belief but I thinkit is wrong
12/08/2010 10:32:58 PM
- 949 Views
Religious institutions, though, pushed hard to pass it.
12/08/2010 10:42:33 PM
- 1035 Views
that doesn’t translate into people voting for religious reasons
12/08/2010 11:19:48 PM
- 855 Views
Bigotry and Fear that are supported and encouraged by religious institutions.
12/08/2010 11:32:30 PM
- 1015 Views
there are major flaws in your argument
12/08/2010 07:51:52 PM
- 1126 Views
Women can't be priests in the Catholic church.
12/08/2010 08:00:24 PM
- 806 Views
Forcing religious institutions to marry gay couples is hideously unconstitutional.
12/08/2010 04:18:59 PM
- 1075 Views
You are absolutely wrong
12/08/2010 07:57:19 PM
- 1069 Views
Your arguments are so specious and stupid I don't know where to begin.
13/08/2010 05:04:17 AM
- 989 Views
Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 07:11:15 PM
- 985 Views
Because "homophobic", like "xenophobic", has shifted a bit in meaning...
12/08/2010 07:33:56 PM
- 1065 Views
Because your reasons for being against gay marriage are so specious *NM*
12/08/2010 07:59:42 PM
- 595 Views
I particularly enjoy the implied assumption that your a good enough judge of my motivations. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:24:14 PM
- 562 Views
Re: Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 08:04:24 PM
- 1137 Views
+1
12/08/2010 08:06:19 PM
- 1175 Views
Stop with the pile on Camilla.
12/08/2010 09:22:35 PM
- 1102 Views
You would have said nothing if I had just said "agreed"
12/08/2010 09:27:33 PM
- 924 Views
Which speaks highly of you....
12/08/2010 09:36:30 PM
- 1103 Views
This is being very petty. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:41:26 PM
- 550 Views
As opposed to a snarky +1 comment? *NM*
12/08/2010 09:45:02 PM
- 570 Views
It's not snarky.
12/08/2010 09:47:47 PM
- 1040 Views
Its a +1 shorthand comment...
12/08/2010 09:52:04 PM
- 1330 Views
Wow. Those two characters allowed you to read Camilla's motivations?
12/08/2010 09:54:25 PM
- 958 Views
Re: Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 09:13:07 PM
- 1137 Views
you are exactly why the state needs to make a clear seperation between the secular and religious
12/08/2010 09:33:22 PM
- 1017 Views
Ok, so if the state does then...
12/08/2010 09:44:31 PM
- 955 Views
No, marriage started because of property.
12/08/2010 09:59:14 PM
- 1051 Views
So then two things come to mind...
12/08/2010 10:04:39 PM
- 1028 Views
Only two?
12/08/2010 10:27:08 PM
- 1025 Views
That's a little difficult to do
13/08/2010 03:19:32 PM
- 1186 Views
Re: That's a little difficult to do
13/08/2010 03:30:14 PM
- 1054 Views
yes but about half of the old testament deals with protecting those rights
13/08/2010 05:16:09 PM
- 1014 Views
The relationship between religion and rain go even farther back...
13/08/2010 06:15:32 PM
- 1000 Views
Actually, I agree with that
12/08/2010 10:01:37 PM
- 902 Views
See, what I don't get is why gay people care about
12/08/2010 08:18:45 PM
- 1011 Views
It's mostly about getting married in the eyes of the state.
12/08/2010 08:42:52 PM
- 1128 Views
I'm fairly sure Jonte was referring only to the "churches have to accept gay marriages" bit. *NM*
12/08/2010 08:44:52 PM
- 599 Views
Starting again
12/08/2010 08:23:08 PM
- 1098 Views
Not at all
12/08/2010 10:58:45 PM
- 1039 Views
Re: Not at all
13/08/2010 09:14:48 AM
- 834 Views
Agreed *NM*
13/08/2010 10:21:06 AM
- 435 Views
Oh dear
13/08/2010 10:30:45 AM
- 949 Views
I suppose you also think that religious Pacifists should be eligible for the draft?
12/08/2010 08:42:21 PM
- 1107 Views