You are treating marriage simply as a religious function when it clearly is not. Atheists are married everyday and a lot of people simply get married by the JP. There is no reason to challenge churches on their teachers and a lot of reasons not to, the constitution being the top of the list. The Catholic church would not marry me because I am not a Catholic and have gone through their sacraments. That in no way impedes on my rights since I have a ton of other options that will get me a marriage just as valid in the eyes of society and in the eyes of the law.
It is the state not the church is who is stopping gay marriage. If the state allowed it some churches would refuse to sanction them but that really means nothing outside of that church and would in no way impede on the rights of gays to marry. It would not even stop them from getting married in a church since there are churches who would be thrilled to marry them.
The opposition to gay marriage goes much deeper than just religion. It is true that many fundamentalist use that as the basis for their opposition but their numbers are too small to stop gay marriage alone. To repeatedly block ballot initiatives all over the country there has to be staunch opposition that extends well beyond the religious right.
It is the state not the church is who is stopping gay marriage. If the state allowed it some churches would refuse to sanction them but that really means nothing outside of that church and would in no way impede on the rights of gays to marry. It would not even stop them from getting married in a church since there are churches who would be thrilled to marry them.
The opposition to gay marriage goes much deeper than just religion. It is true that many fundamentalist use that as the basis for their opposition but their numbers are too small to stop gay marriage alone. To repeatedly block ballot initiatives all over the country there has to be staunch opposition that extends well beyond the religious right.
Gay Marriage
12/08/2010 10:23:19 AM
- 1921 Views
I disagree on the latter part
12/08/2010 12:04:15 PM
- 1286 Views
I follow your point...
12/08/2010 12:14:17 PM
- 1267 Views
Suspect you would find plenty of denominations that would argue with you rather strenuously.
12/08/2010 12:24:55 PM
- 1263 Views
See, that's what I'm saying...
12/08/2010 07:37:26 PM
- 1227 Views
You didn't read my post.
12/08/2010 09:10:21 PM
- 1139 Views
Actually, you didn't read my post
12/08/2010 09:23:54 PM
- 1183 Views
Um, you're wrong.
12/08/2010 09:37:13 PM
- 1178 Views

Re: Um, you're wrong.
12/08/2010 09:44:17 PM
- 1148 Views

Boy Scouts of America v. Dale. And no, he described it accurately. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:53:31 PM
- 595 Views
You're still wrong.
12/08/2010 09:54:55 PM
- 1280 Views

Re: You're still wrong.
12/08/2010 09:58:26 PM
- 1130 Views

Again, you are still wrong.
12/08/2010 10:04:42 PM
- 1183 Views

Re: Again, you are still wrong.
12/08/2010 10:17:13 PM
- 1029 Views

Wrong definition of "club"
12/08/2010 10:30:52 PM
- 1287 Views
Re: Wrong definition of "club"
12/08/2010 10:40:55 PM
- 1192 Views
Also
12/08/2010 10:02:44 PM
- 1238 Views
And wrong again.
12/08/2010 10:08:24 PM
- 1257 Views

Not so quick!
12/08/2010 10:21:31 PM
- 1093 Views

Yes, so quick!
12/08/2010 10:32:13 PM
- 1049 Views
Let's be reasonable here
12/08/2010 10:41:53 PM
- 1156 Views
Why do you get to judge?
12/08/2010 10:48:57 PM
- 1185 Views
I don't
12/08/2010 10:53:21 PM
- 1067 Views
OK.
12/08/2010 10:58:22 PM
- 1187 Views
Re: OK.
12/08/2010 11:03:50 PM
- 1125 Views
Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith.
12/08/2010 11:14:03 PM
- 1081 Views
Re: Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith.
12/08/2010 11:23:35 PM
- 1192 Views
Then please stop.
12/08/2010 11:01:05 PM
- 1154 Views

What's wrong with discussion?
12/08/2010 11:05:48 PM
- 1099 Views
Discussion? Nothing. Your assertions about other people's views, something.
12/08/2010 11:09:48 PM
- 1120 Views
What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
12/08/2010 10:12:54 PM
- 1002 Views
Re: What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
12/08/2010 10:23:36 PM
- 1137 Views
Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer.
12/08/2010 10:36:48 PM
- 1095 Views
Re: Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer.
12/08/2010 10:46:22 PM
- 1211 Views
Not entirely true either... or, well, true as far as Brown goes.
12/08/2010 10:08:42 PM
- 1110 Views
Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need
12/08/2010 09:38:33 PM
- 1180 Views
Re: Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need
12/08/2010 09:55:05 PM
- 1111 Views
Gah.
12/08/2010 09:59:45 PM
- 1052 Views
What a mature response.
12/08/2010 10:11:00 PM
- 1258 Views
I can't speak for Rebekah, but I don't think the issue is that your points are invalid per se.
12/08/2010 10:22:30 PM
- 1056 Views
Um
12/08/2010 09:46:43 PM
- 1208 Views
That's a very good question. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:49:05 PM
- 562 Views
It makes no sense
12/08/2010 04:29:24 PM
- 1051 Views
Re: It makes no sense
12/08/2010 07:39:25 PM
- 1131 Views
Re: It makes no sense
12/08/2010 07:41:02 PM
- 1204 Views
Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder...
12/08/2010 09:08:53 PM
- 1037 Views
Re: Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder...
12/08/2010 09:42:21 PM
- 1159 Views
What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin?
12/08/2010 09:45:33 PM
- 1215 Views
Re: What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin?
13/08/2010 11:04:02 AM
- 1147 Views
Wow, it's almost like an entire denomination believes that!
*NM*
13/08/2010 03:41:07 PM
- 550 Views
13/08/2010 03:43:26 PM
- 951 Views


Yeah, that's the Roman Catholic basis against masturbation and contraception. *NM*
13/08/2010 04:12:00 PM
- 532 Views
Yes
13/08/2010 04:22:58 PM
- 996 Views
Dude....please at least have a working knowledge of the Bible before you spout off.
12/08/2010 10:47:13 PM
- 1029 Views
secular marriage is decoupled from religious marriage
12/08/2010 02:50:43 PM
- 1228 Views
Simple, require the legal and religious marriage to be performed separately.
12/08/2010 02:58:43 PM
- 1060 Views
And they are, in fact, separate right now in the US. They're just called the same thing.
12/08/2010 03:29:26 PM
- 1105 Views
It's not the same name that's confusing so much as the single ceremony. Or so it seems to me.
12/08/2010 03:37:20 PM
- 1116 Views
I disagree. I think giving the legal institution the same name as the sacrament is the problem.
12/08/2010 03:59:43 PM
- 1098 Views
What in the world would that accomplish?
12/08/2010 03:44:32 PM
- 1151 Views
Provide some much-needed clarity, evidently.
12/08/2010 03:49:33 PM
- 989 Views
the problem is it would be changing a centuries old tradition..
12/08/2010 04:26:47 PM
- 1009 Views
heheheheheheheHAHAHAHEHEHehehehehahheeh*cough*
12/08/2010 04:55:09 PM
- 1019 Views
thats OK I am sure you will get over it
12/08/2010 05:22:08 PM
- 1044 Views
Just guessing, but I think it was the "centuries old tradition" that set off the giggle fit.
12/08/2010 07:25:38 PM
- 1173 Views
Really? I was hoping for something better
12/08/2010 10:06:00 PM
- 1108 Views
So government recognition makes your religion meaningful?
12/08/2010 10:11:54 PM
- 1190 Views
not my religion I'm agnostic
12/08/2010 10:34:40 PM
- 1056 Views
I'm not far left, thank you very much. *NM*
12/08/2010 10:20:31 PM
- 615 Views
no but your are European and that slants your views
*NM*
12/08/2010 10:36:01 PM
- 607 Views

Simples
12/08/2010 09:30:31 PM
- 1125 Views
there are about 140 post ranging from boyscouts to infant babtism
12/08/2010 10:57:46 PM
- 1099 Views
So.
14/08/2010 01:27:59 AM
- 980 Views
sorry I responded I forgot what a tool you are. my bad
14/08/2010 02:48:57 AM
- 1486 Views
You spout some utter gibberish then dish out insults when called on it? Very funny
15/08/2010 12:47:04 PM
- 1319 Views

Agreed *NM*
12/08/2010 03:45:04 PM
- 490 Views
I love you, Camilla
12/08/2010 04:02:15 PM
- 924 Views
Re: I love you, Camilla
12/08/2010 04:04:10 PM
- 1122 Views
A couple of things
12/08/2010 12:58:09 PM
- 1108 Views
there is major flaw in your argument
12/08/2010 03:31:45 PM
- 1234 Views
Re: there is major flaw in your argument
12/08/2010 04:01:32 PM
- 1122 Views
I should clarify that I support gay marriage
12/08/2010 05:20:36 PM
- 1058 Views
One point about Prop. 8
12/08/2010 07:38:55 PM
- 1068 Views
I know that is the commonl;y held belief but I thinkit is wrong
12/08/2010 10:32:58 PM
- 1020 Views
Religious institutions, though, pushed hard to pass it.
12/08/2010 10:42:33 PM
- 1108 Views
that doesn’t translate into people voting for religious reasons
12/08/2010 11:19:48 PM
- 925 Views
Bigotry and Fear that are supported and encouraged by religious institutions.
12/08/2010 11:32:30 PM
- 1093 Views
there are major flaws in your argument
12/08/2010 07:51:52 PM
- 1195 Views
Women can't be priests in the Catholic church.
12/08/2010 08:00:24 PM
- 882 Views
Forcing religious institutions to marry gay couples is hideously unconstitutional.
12/08/2010 04:18:59 PM
- 1196 Views
You are absolutely wrong
12/08/2010 07:57:19 PM
- 1139 Views
Your arguments are so specious and stupid I don't know where to begin.
13/08/2010 05:04:17 AM
- 1072 Views
Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 07:11:15 PM
- 1069 Views
Because "homophobic", like "xenophobic", has shifted a bit in meaning...
12/08/2010 07:33:56 PM
- 1142 Views
Because your reasons for being against gay marriage are so specious *NM*
12/08/2010 07:59:42 PM
- 625 Views
I particularly enjoy the implied assumption that your a good enough judge of my motivations. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:24:14 PM
- 593 Views
Re: Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 08:04:24 PM
- 1209 Views
+1
12/08/2010 08:06:19 PM
- 1248 Views
Stop with the pile on Camilla.
12/08/2010 09:22:35 PM
- 1172 Views
You would have said nothing if I had just said "agreed"
12/08/2010 09:27:33 PM
- 1000 Views
Which speaks highly of you....
12/08/2010 09:36:30 PM
- 1180 Views
This is being very petty. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:41:26 PM
- 576 Views
As opposed to a snarky +1 comment? *NM*
12/08/2010 09:45:02 PM
- 591 Views
It's not snarky.
12/08/2010 09:47:47 PM
- 1114 Views
Its a +1 shorthand comment...
12/08/2010 09:52:04 PM
- 1397 Views
Wow. Those two characters allowed you to read Camilla's motivations?
12/08/2010 09:54:25 PM
- 1027 Views
Re: Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 09:13:07 PM
- 1215 Views
you are exactly why the state needs to make a clear seperation between the secular and religious
12/08/2010 09:33:22 PM
- 1086 Views
Ok, so if the state does then...
12/08/2010 09:44:31 PM
- 1024 Views
No, marriage started because of property.
12/08/2010 09:59:14 PM
- 1118 Views
So then two things come to mind...
12/08/2010 10:04:39 PM
- 1098 Views
Only two?
12/08/2010 10:27:08 PM
- 1094 Views

That's a little difficult to do
13/08/2010 03:19:32 PM
- 1261 Views
Re: That's a little difficult to do
13/08/2010 03:30:14 PM
- 1131 Views
yes but about half of the old testament deals with protecting those rights
13/08/2010 05:16:09 PM
- 1093 Views
The relationship between religion and rain go even farther back...
13/08/2010 06:15:32 PM
- 1080 Views
Actually, I agree with that
12/08/2010 10:01:37 PM
- 986 Views
See, what I don't get is why gay people care about
12/08/2010 08:18:45 PM
- 1085 Views
It's mostly about getting married in the eyes of the state.
12/08/2010 08:42:52 PM
- 1203 Views
I'm fairly sure Jonte was referring only to the "churches have to accept gay marriages" bit. *NM*
12/08/2010 08:44:52 PM
- 627 Views
Starting again
12/08/2010 08:23:08 PM
- 1187 Views
Not at all
12/08/2010 10:58:45 PM
- 1116 Views
Re: Not at all
13/08/2010 09:14:48 AM
- 902 Views
Agreed *NM*
13/08/2010 10:21:06 AM
- 465 Views
Oh dear
13/08/2010 10:30:45 AM
- 1013 Views
I suppose you also think that religious Pacifists should be eligible for the draft?
12/08/2010 08:42:21 PM
- 1162 Views