Active Users:1111 Time:23/11/2024 01:07:02 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Spoken like someone who does not have to insure an employee's six wives. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 11/08/2010 03:11:57 PM
It's probably worth noting people are horribly abusing the facts with a lot of citations of 'rights' going on here, however, for the sake of argument, can anyone justify gay marriage without justifying polygamy or incest and without mentioning procreation or two?


This is a tangent, but what are forums for if not tangents.

There is nothing inherently evil in polygamy, or indeed polyandry. As long as it is an open and honest arrangement, I don't see a problem with it. In fact, it is much more acceptable to me than people cheating on their spouses.

Incest is a whole other ball game.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Let's ban all Christian Marriage. Dannymac - 07/08/2010 06:36:13 AM 1533 Views
Nice satire, but it raises another point for me. Helene - 07/08/2010 07:20:49 AM 962 Views
One small problem... Phelix - 07/08/2010 08:02:34 AM 981 Views
Re tax. Rebekah - 07/08/2010 08:47:22 AM 1014 Views
That seems sensible to me. SilverWarder - 09/08/2010 08:13:26 PM 857 Views
Not sure what you mean by "demoted." Dannymac - 07/08/2010 03:50:02 PM 1016 Views
Nice. *NM* Camilla - 07/08/2010 08:58:20 AM 584 Views
That would only be appropriate if Christians wanted to ban secular unions of normal people. Cannoli - 07/08/2010 11:51:29 AM 1185 Views
Hey, look! There was a point over there! Dannymac - 07/08/2010 03:46:41 PM 995 Views
Who else should make those decisions? Cannoli - 07/08/2010 08:00:39 PM 945 Views
I'd totally... Ectheledhel - 08/08/2010 04:14:15 AM 911 Views
I'd totally... ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:17:30 AM 1056 Views
You'd defend this idiot? *NM* Ectheledhel - 08/08/2010 06:40:34 AM 474 Views
Indeed ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:43:53 AM 994 Views
I used to think Joel was the biggest rambler on this site. I am seriously reconsidering. everynametaken - 08/08/2010 05:24:56 AM 981 Views
And my assessment of one poster as the most content-poor, non-contributing slug is unchanged Cannoli - 08/08/2010 07:17:02 PM 894 Views
Um, ok. *NM* everynametaken - 10/08/2010 12:48:19 AM 475 Views
*Shakes Head* Dannymac - 08/08/2010 06:23:47 AM 864 Views
I highly doubt Cannoli is "scared" of homosexuals *NM* ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:29:54 AM 504 Views
Perhaps not in the physical sense. Great Lord of Chaos - 08/08/2010 06:35:53 AM 958 Views
Re: Perhaps not in the physical sense. ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:46:56 AM 919 Views
Gah! You did that on purpose! Vodalus - 09/08/2010 01:05:13 AM 873 Views
whoops *NM* ßelals Girl - 09/08/2010 02:22:49 AM 439 Views
Re: *Shakes Head* Cannoli - 08/08/2010 07:43:11 PM 909 Views
I still do not see how you think marriage is a "pointless" institution LadyLorraine - 08/08/2010 08:05:45 PM 1010 Views
No, I was referring to same-sex marriage. Real marriage hardly counts as a novelty. *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 02:28:43 PM 417 Views
This must be the "thought out reaction" I've heard so much about. Dannymac - 08/08/2010 10:45:59 PM 854 Views
You cannot be that stupid. Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:10:55 PM 1140 Views
There's a lot of ridiculous arguments here, but I'll focus on just one of them... Legolas - 11/08/2010 03:38:05 PM 1017 Views
Incorrect. Genders are not treated equally. Dreaded Anomaly - 11/08/2010 07:53:00 PM 1228 Views
all you need is enough support to pass an amendment random thoughts - 08/08/2010 02:46:08 PM 849 Views
A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too Isaac - 08/08/2010 11:51:24 PM 884 Views
And what is wrong with polygamy? *NM* Ectheledhel - 09/08/2010 10:36:53 AM 476 Views
Did I say there was anything? Isaac - 09/08/2010 11:03:10 AM 1001 Views
Plolygamy and incest are not on the same level of bad. Camilla - 09/08/2010 11:00:07 AM 923 Views
Is that assumption valid? Isaac - 09/08/2010 11:36:26 AM 875 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid? Camilla - 09/08/2010 11:46:42 AM 858 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid? Isaac - 09/08/2010 12:07:22 PM 968 Views
Not really snoopcester - 09/08/2010 01:20:46 PM 827 Views
Re: Not really Isaac - 09/08/2010 01:27:04 PM 957 Views
Re: Not really snoopcester - 09/08/2010 02:14:43 PM 839 Views
Re: Not really Isaac - 09/08/2010 03:06:31 PM 983 Views
Spoken like someone who does not have to insure an employee's six wives. Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:11:57 PM 999 Views
... Camilla - 11/08/2010 03:22:50 PM 878 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too snoopcester - 09/08/2010 11:25:39 AM 886 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too Isaac - 09/08/2010 11:51:50 AM 849 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too snoopcester - 09/08/2010 01:18:35 PM 943 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too Isaac - 09/08/2010 02:54:19 PM 963 Views
Mmm, but when you're strictly discussing marriage LadyLorraine - 09/08/2010 06:13:30 PM 1014 Views
Re: Mmm, but when you're strictly discussing marriage Isaac - 10/08/2010 01:24:06 AM 824 Views
Now I think about it, I'm not sure. Dannymac - 10/08/2010 04:09:43 PM 938 Views
Re: Now I think about it, I'm not sure. Isaac - 10/08/2010 06:12:39 PM 827 Views
Great post Danny SilverWarder - 09/08/2010 08:22:27 PM 694 Views
It should be noted again... Jeordam - 09/08/2010 08:59:32 PM 989 Views
and how is it not a right? LadyLorraine - 09/08/2010 09:19:12 PM 863 Views
My definition of rights... Jeordam - 09/08/2010 10:47:16 PM 988 Views
mmm, but the UN has legally stated marriage as a right. LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 02:52:03 AM 753 Views
+1 Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 03:11:22 AM 1040 Views
Article 16 probably not a great example Isaac - 10/08/2010 03:44:04 AM 852 Views
You could just as easily move the emphasis... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 04:08:46 AM 976 Views
If we need a more specific resolution... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 04:22:12 AM 1160 Views
No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context Isaac - 10/08/2010 05:25:57 AM 848 Views
Re: No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 03:04:39 PM 1162 Views
That's really a ridiculous stance, you do realize. Legolas - 10/08/2010 03:23:02 PM 814 Views
The point is that marriage IS a right, one which cannot be denied based upon sexual orientation *NM* Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 07:04:16 PM 678 Views
Re: No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context Isaac - 10/08/2010 03:46:56 PM 1039 Views
It doesn't say a man can only marry a woman or vice versa, though. Dreaded Anomaly - 10/08/2010 04:24:17 AM 851 Views
It also doesn't say they can Isaac - 10/08/2010 04:41:18 AM 855 Views
You're missing the point. It's not about gay marriage. Legolas - 10/08/2010 11:20:59 AM 844 Views
No, I got that, I'm pointing out how it does so Isaac - 10/08/2010 01:47:00 PM 869 Views
I know, and that's been brought up before. But that's not my point. LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 06:09:32 PM 843 Views
Re: I know, and that's been brought up before. But that's not my point. Isaac - 10/08/2010 06:33:56 PM 775 Views
It's mentioned as a right in some SC decision quoted in that Walker opinion. *NM* Legolas - 10/08/2010 06:51:13 PM 429 Views
To clarify for you SilverWarder - 10/08/2010 05:36:14 AM 777 Views
The UNSC is actually the UN's enforcement body... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 07:16:31 PM 1222 Views
I'm not sure that I would call the Security Council the 'Enforcement Body' SilverWarder - 10/08/2010 08:43:02 PM 825 Views
The fact that it is capable of authorizing the use of military force makes it an enforcement body Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 10:33:59 PM 1088 Views
Disagree - but it's most a matter of definition there SilverWarder - 11/08/2010 04:31:53 PM 992 Views
What the UN thinks is *completely* worthless.... Jeordam - 10/08/2010 06:43:15 PM 785 Views
and the Constitution dictates nothing about marriage. *NM* LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 11:46:24 PM 457 Views
That means it is up to the people. And they say "No." *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:13:12 PM 462 Views
No, but it does dictate things about rights and discrimination SilverWarder - 12/08/2010 03:48:02 PM 1031 Views
Why don't YOU back up your assertion that the right to marry exists? *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:16:02 PM 474 Views
The actual ruling on Prop 8 specifices marriage as a freedom, not a right. Dreaded Anomaly - 10/08/2010 12:02:17 AM 929 Views
Out of curiosity, what would you say to using the Ninth Amendment, possibly in conjunction... Vodalus - 10/08/2010 12:20:19 AM 1006 Views
I agree LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 06:11:19 PM 733 Views
Yeah but this can't be used to prove that it IS a right... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 07:30:57 PM 1084 Views
Note it all you want... Dannymac - 10/08/2010 06:43:53 AM 726 Views
No, they seek to expand the terms of the partnership. Homosexuals can & do get married normally *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:14:25 PM 480 Views
The best one yet. Camilla - 10/08/2010 07:59:17 PM 973 Views
Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane SilverWarder - 10/08/2010 08:49:24 PM 849 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane Camilla - 10/08/2010 09:03:11 PM 957 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane SilverWarder - 11/08/2010 04:35:03 PM 837 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane Camilla - 11/08/2010 04:41:23 PM 959 Views
Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel SilverWarder - 11/08/2010 05:06:47 PM 936 Views
Re: Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel Camilla - 11/08/2010 05:09:23 PM 924 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes