Active Users:1162 Time:23/11/2024 03:27:22 AM
Oh it's coming. Aemon Send a noteboard - 27/07/2010 08:36:22 PM
(See the link.)

I really love my nook. I didn't think I'd like it as much as I do.


This is the response of everyone I've ever known to buy a dedicated e-reader. Every time I've gotten in an argument with someone about these devices, I ask "do you have one?" And I always get back, "well, no, but I've tried one, and it couldn't possibly replace the smell of stale glue!"

They take some time to get used to, but readers are teh bestest.

Now, if they'd just publish EVERYTHING in eFormat on day one....


As I say, that's definitely coming. Amazon already sells about 20% more ebooks than hardcover books, and the Kindle is (supposedly) one of their bestselling products. ebooks are absolutely here to stay, and it's just a matter of time before publishing companies recognize and fully embrace them. They're just cranky because they don't want to stop charging eight dollars for a book.
Reply to message
I've worked out the one feature that will make an Ebook reader appealing. - 27/07/2010 11:34:52 AM 865 Views
Put it in two opposite facing zip-loc sandwich bags. - 27/07/2010 12:44:23 PM 486 Views
Not sure if I'd trust a $0.02 plastic bag.to protect a $199 (AUD) toy. - 27/07/2010 02:28:55 PM 542 Views
That's actually what I do with my iphone when I'm on the boat. - 27/07/2010 03:10:33 PM 574 Views
I can see your point, but there's very little risk. - 27/07/2010 08:27:40 PM 483 Views
Re: I've worked out the one feature that will make an Ebook reader appealing. - 27/07/2010 06:31:25 PM 590 Views
that does not mean it cannot be made waterproof. - 27/07/2010 07:52:33 PM 460 Views
Well, then have I got the link for YOU! - 27/07/2010 08:09:46 PM 705 Views
Oh it's coming. - 27/07/2010 08:36:22 PM 508 Views
Nice *NM* - 28/07/2010 12:20:12 AM 242 Views
For me it would be a "Convert to Movie" button. *NM* - 27/07/2010 10:35:22 PM 251 Views
Re: For me it would be a "Convert to Movie" button. - 28/07/2010 12:24:09 AM 595 Views
This is not technically correct... - 28/07/2010 09:06:58 PM 539 Views

Reply to Message